Aulonastus, Kethley, 1970

Skoracki, Maciej, Spicer, Greg S. & Oconnor, Barry M., 2016, A systematiC review of the subfamily Syringophilinae (ACari: Syringophilidae) of the NearCtiC region. Part 1: quill mites assoCiated with passerines (Aves: Passeriformes), Zootaxa 4084 (4), pp. 451-494 : 457-458

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4084.4.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AD929587-1481-4D29-A62D-1E445D1D0546

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5311269

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3F5D0116-FFA6-FFF1-FF47-FC12FA6DFEFB

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Aulonastus
status

 

Key to species of the genus Aulonastus View in CoL

(females)

* species occurring in the Nearctic region.

1. Setae f2 and h2 subequal in length.............................. A. sturnellus Skoracki, Hendricks and Spicer, 2010 View in CoL *

- Setae h2 3–8 times longer than f2 ......................................................................... 2

2. Setae c1 and se subequal in length........................................................................ 3

- Setae c1 1.2–1.5 longer than se ........................................................................... 5

3. Length ratio of setae f1: f2 1:2.8–3....................................................................... 4

- Length ratio of setae f1: f2 1:1.4–2................................................... A. lusciniae Skoracki, 2002 View in CoL

4. Setae h2 21 times longer than h1 and f1. Setae c1 and d2 subequal in length. Each medial branch of peritremes with 1 chamber, each lateral branch with 6 chambers.................................................... A. pipili Kethley, 1970 View in CoL *

- Setae h 2 11–12 times longer than h1 and f1. Setae c1 1.2 times longer than d2. Each medial branch of peritremes with 2 cham- bers, each lateral branch with 5 chambers........................... A. pirangus Skoracki, Hendricks and Spicer, 2010 View in CoL *

5. Setae f2 twice as long as f1 ............................................................................. 6

- Setae f2 2.8–4 times longer than f1 ....................................................................... 8

6. Propodonotal shield constricted posteriorly, bearing bases of setae ve, si and c1. Setae e2 1.5–2 times longer than d1 ................................................................ A. emberizicus Skoracki, Hendricks and Spicer, 2010 View in CoL *

- Propodonotal shield rectangular in shape, bearing bases of setae ve, si, se and c1. Setae e2 and d1 subequal in length...... 7

7. Length of agenital setae ag1 and ag2 55................................................ A. anthus Skoracki, 2011 View in CoL

- Length of agenital setae ag1 and ag2 80–95............................................ A. fringillus Skoracki, 2011 View in CoL

8. Length ratio of setae f1:f2 1:2.8–3.3...................................................................... 9

- Length ratio of setae f1:f2 1:4........................................................................... 12

9. Each medial branch of peritremes with 1 chamber.......................................................... 10

- Each medial branch of peritremes with 2 chambers......................................................... 11

10. Each lateral branch of peritremes with 6 chambers. Hysteronotal shield punctate in posterior part. Length ratio of setae ag1: ag2 2:1. Length of setae se 120–125....................... A. pteroptochos Sikora, Kaszewska and Skoracki, 2014 View in CoL

- Each lateral branch of peritremes with 4–5 chambers. Hysteronotal shield apunctate in posterior part. Length ratio of setae ag1: ag2 1.2–1.4:1. Length of setae se 140–145..................... A. euphagus Skoracki, Hendricks and Spicer, 2010 View in CoL *

11. Hysteronotal shield apunctate, setae d1 situated near anterior margin of this shield. Length of setae ag2 40–50. All coxal fields sparsely punctate.................................................... A. henicorhina Sikora and Skoracki, 2012 View in CoL

- Hysteronotal shield punctate in posterior part, setae d1 situated on anterior margin of this shield. Length of setae ag2 65–80. All coxal fields apunctate.............................................. A. prunellae Bochkov and Mironov, 1999 View in CoL

12. Propodonotal shield constricted posteriorly, bearing bases of setae ve, si and c1. Agenital setae ag1 and ag2 subequal in length

................................................................................. A. lanius Skoracki, 2011 View in CoL - Propodonotal shield rectangular in shape, bearing bases of setae ve, si, se and c1. Agenital setae ag1 1.2–1.5 times longer than ag2 ............................................................................................... 13 13. Lengths of setae se, d2, e2 and ag2 145–170, 130–145, 35–45 and 60–70, respectively............ A. loxius Skoracki, 2011 View in CoL

- Lengths of setae se, d2, e2 and ag2 125, 105–120, 20 and 50–55, respectively................... A. albus Skoracki, 2002 View in CoL

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF