Geomys Rafinesque, 1817
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7353077 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7282062 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/417587B5-C06C-FFF7-FF2C-FB6D4A0587D4 |
treatment provided by |
GgServerImporter |
scientific name |
Geomys Rafinesque, 1817 |
status |
|
Geomys Rafinesque, 1817 View in CoL . Am. Mon. Mag., 2(1):45.
TYPE SPECIES: Geomys pinetis Rafinesque, 1817 View in CoL .
SYNONYMS: Ascomys Lichtenstein, Diplostoma Rafinesque, Parageomys Hibbard, Pseudostoma Say, Saccophorus Kuhl.
COMMENTS: Revised by Merriam (1895a). Specific boundaries in this genus are poorly defined. Complex relationships have been described for several definable geographic units based on a variety of contact zone analyses that have employed morphological, karyological, allozyme, and/or mitochondrial and nuclear DNA biochemical analyses. These have indicated varying degrees of hybridization between geographically differentiated forms, and authors vary in their recognition of these entities at the specific or subspecific levels. While the rather traditional species ( arenarius , bursarius , personatus , pinetis , and tropicalis ; Hall, 1981) are clearly an inadequate representation of specific diversity in the genus (see Block and Zimmerman, 1991), this arrangement is followed here due to lack of a thorough geographic analysis throughout the range of the genus and a concensus among workers. Keys to the species of Geomys were published by Baker and Williams (1974) and Hall (1981).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.