Ochterus barberi Schell, 1943
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/aemnp.2020.003 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:085DDB9B-0127-4EF6-9B32-826C0FB1219E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4469379 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/43368780-FA58-1855-B995-FD84FB58F935 |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Ochterus barberi Schell, 1943 |
status |
|
Ochterus barberi Schell, 1943 View in CoL
Ochterus barberi Schell, 1943a: 32 View in CoL , 35 (key to species, illustration). LECTOTYPE (designated by SCHELL 1943b: 42, as holotype):, USA: Arizona: ‘ Colorado Canyon’ [= Grand Canyon of Colorado River] (USNM).
Ochterus barberi View in CoL : SCHELL (1943b): 41 –42 (original description, differential diagnosis); DRAKE (1952): 74 (checklist); MENKE (1979): 125 (distribution, illustration); POLHEMUS & POLHEMUS (1988a): 542 (catalogue); POLHEMUS (1992b): 442 (note on type labels); HECKMAN (2011): 287, 463 (key to species, illustration); POLHEMUS & POLHEMUS (2016): 17, 30–33 (key to species, redescription, illustrations).
Distribution. Nearctic Region: USA: Arizona ( SCHELL 1943b; DRAKE 1952; POLHEMUS 1973; POLHEMUS & POLHEMUS 1976, 1988a, 2016; STEVENS & POLHEMUS 2008), California ( MENKE 1979; POLHEMUS & POLHEMUS 1988a, 2016), Colorado ( POLHEMUS & POLHEMUS 2016), New Mexico ( DRAKE 1952; POLHEMUS 1973; POLHEMUS & POLHEMUS 1988a, 2016); Mexico: Sonora ( POLHEMUS & POLHEMUS 1988a, 2016).
Note. SCHELL (1943b) also listed paratypes [actually paralectotypes] from Orizaba, in the Mexican state of Veracruz, but these specimens have proven on closer examination to represent females of O. aeneifrons ( POLHEMUS & POLHEMUS 2016).
The revision of American Ochterus including the description of O. barberi was published divided in two parts, first published in January 1943 ( SCHELL 1943a) and second in April 1943 ( SCHELL 1943b). The species was first introduced in the key, which is sufficient to make it available ( ICZN 1999: Art. 13.1.1), without any mention of type specimens ( SCHELL 1943a: 32), while the original description including the holotype designation appeared in the second part ( SCHELL 1943b: 41). As a holotype is defined as ‘the single specimen upon which a new nominal species-group taxon is based in the original publication’ ( ICZN 1999: Art. 73.1), in this case, the subsequently designated ‘holotype’ must be considered the lectotype according to ICZN (1999: Art. 74.5).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ochterus barberi Schell, 1943
Kment, Petr, Carapezza, Attilio & Jindra, Zdeněk 2020 |
Ochterus barberi
SCHELL D. V. 1943: 32 |
SCHELL D. V. 1943: 42 |
Ochterus barberi
POLHEMUS D. A. & POLHEMUS J. T. 2016: 17 |
HECKMAN 2011: 287 |
POLHEMUS J. T. 1992: 442 |
POLHEMUS D. A. & POLHEMUS J. T. 1988: 542 |
MENKE A. S. 1979: 125 |
DRAKE C. J. 1952: 74 |
SCHELL D. V. 1943: 41 |