Thorasena, Macquart

Hauser, Martin, Woodley, Norman E. & Fachin, Diego A., 2017, Taxonomic changes in African Stratiomyidae (Diptera), Zootaxa 4263 (1) : -

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4263.1.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4DD4B6E9-DBBF-46AD-9A55-4325C0AD9586

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5999061

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4579C86C-AA7C-F37D-FF53-FBDFFA8C8FC4

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Thorasena
status

 

Genus THORASENA Macquart View in CoL

Thorasena Macquart, 1838: 177 View in CoL . Type species, Hermetia pectoralis Wiedemann, 1824 View in CoL , by original designation. Stat. rev. Dolichodema Kertész, 1916: 147 View in CoL . Type species, Dolichodema africana Kertész, 1916 View in CoL , by original designation, Syn. nov.

Thorasena pectoralis (Wiedemann) . Comb. nov.

Hermetia pectoralis Wiedemann, 1824: 19 View in CoL . ST 1 ♀ [ UZMC]: Guinea.

Dolichodema africana Kertész, 1916: 148 View in CoL . HT ♀ [ HNHM, destroyed]: Equatorial Guinea: Bioko. Syn. nov.

Thorasena fenestrata (James) . Comb. nov.

Dolichodema fenestrata James, 1949: 5 . HT ♀ [AMNH]: Liberia: Robertsport, Bendu. Nemodema nudibasis Lindner, 1958: 122 . HT ♀ [NMP]: Zimbabwe: Trelawney.

When Wiedemann described Hermetia pectoralis View in CoL he did not indicate the gender of the specimen and he only gave a brief description. Woodley (2001: 184) stated the gender as male, but it is a female. Later, Macquart (1838) erected the genus Thorasena View in CoL with H. pectoralis View in CoL as the type species. Macquart provided an illustration of the species, but it is very likely that he never saw the type specimen or any other specimen because of the several discrepancies between the drawing and the type specimen. In the drawing he depicted four M veins, instead of the three present in the type. Also, the illustration shows the pedicel being as long as broad, which is by far the most common condition in Stratiomyidae View in CoL , while the type specimen has the pedicel elongated, as long as the scape. There are more differences in the wing venation, thorax coloration, leg coloration, overall proportions etc., although Macquart’s illustrations often show a high degree of abstraction. All the characters mentioned in Wiedemann’s descriptions are illustrated correctly, while Macquart just substituted unknown features with typical Hermetia View in CoL -like ones. After studying photographs ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ) of the type specimen of H. pectoralis View in CoL (kindly supplied by T. Pape), it was clear that this species does not belong in the Hermetiinae View in CoL , but is a Pachygastrinae View in CoL . Although the type of Dolichodema africana View in CoL is destroyed, it is clear from the description that D. africana View in CoL and H. pectoralis View in CoL are conspecific. Therefore the two species have to be synonymized and Dolichodema View in CoL has to be placed as a synonym of Thorasena View in CoL .

UZMC

Universidad del Zulia

HNHM

Hungarian Natural History Museum (Termeszettudomanyi Muzeum)

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Stratiomyidae

Loc

Thorasena

Hauser, Martin, Woodley, Norman E. & Fachin, Diego A. 2017
2017
Loc

Dolichodema fenestrata

Lindner 1958: 122
James 1949: 5
1949
Loc

Dolichodema africana Kertész, 1916 : 148

Kertesz 1916: 148
1916
Loc

Thorasena

Kertesz 1916: 147
Macquart 1838: 177
1838
Loc

Hermetia pectoralis

Wiedemann 1824: 19
1824
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF