Heus Bishop & Williams, 2000
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3215.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B20CD4A6-D150-4CCF-931F-ED6D7EA54E8C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5250412 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4601C935-FFC2-F93E-5BB4-FC44F5C3FA4F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Heus Bishop & Williams, 2000 |
status |
|
Genus Heus Bishop & Williams, 2000 View in CoL
Heus Bishop & Williams, 2000: 290 View in CoL .
Type species. Heus foersteri Bishop & Williams, 2000 View in CoL .
Remarks. Only the carapace of Heus foersteri (see Bishop & Williams 2000: 290, fig. 4), from the upper Campanian of South Dakota and Colorado, U.S.A., is preserved. This reveals a unique set of characters: rostrum broad and narrow, strongly sulcate, with a keel that extending onto the carapace; oval swellings on epigastric and protogastric regions; cervical groove discernible; lateral margins with but a single, diminutive spine. These characters distinguish it easily from Bournelyreidus n. gen. Re-examination of the type series of B.? oaheensis (see above) is needed to decide if it might also be better accommodated in Heus .
The wide carapace, with clearly concave posterior (divergent) portions of the posterolateral margins, weakly armoured anterolateral margin, and swellings on the anterior carapace surface are somewhat similar to the configuration in Symethis Weber, 1795 (see below). The orbitofrontal construction, however, makes its placement in the Lyreidinae more likely.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Heus Bishop & Williams, 2000
Van Bakel, Barry W. M., Guinot, Danièle, Artal, Pedro, Fraaije, René H. B. & Jagt, John W. M. 2012 |
Heus
Bishop, G. A. & Williams, A. B. 2000: 290 |