Arcturina psittacus, Bamber, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930701850489 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/47486621-8A7C-FFBD-FE07-7046FE25A586 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Arcturina psittacus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Arcturina psittacus View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figures 10–12 View Figure 10 View Figure 11 View Figure 12 )
Material
One female, holotype (registration no. NHM.2003.354), four females, eight juveniles (NHM.2003.359–368), two subadult males (NHM.2003.355–356), two males (NHM.2003.357–358), paratypes, station Z, off the mouth of Conic Island Cave, Hong Kong, 22 ° 219540 N 114 ° 239220 E; sediment 1% gravel, 96% sand, 3% silt/clay, depth 13.7 m. Coll. N.J. Evans and P.F. Clark, 25 October 2002 .
Description of adult female
Body ( Figures 10E, G View Figure 10 ) 2.5 to 2.7 mm long (rostrum to tip of telson), exoskeleton smooth and strongly calcified, with irregular brown pigment. Cephalon with welldeveloped anterolateral lobes and small, rounded rostrum ( Figure 10A View Figure 10 ); eyes present, pigmented. Pereonite 1 fused to cephalon. Pereonites 5 to 7 distinct, without dorsal ridges. Pleonites 1 and 2 distinct dorsally and with raised dorsal ridges; pleotelson pentagonal.
Antennule peduncle naked; flagellum of single articles bearing two distal aesthetascs. Antenna ( Figures 10G View Figure 10 , 11B View Figure 11 ) peduncle third article twice as long as second and half length of subequal fourth and fifth articles; flagellum of three articles, distal two with ventral row of short spines resembling saw-teeth.
Mandible ( Figure 11C View Figure 11 ) with three spines in spine row and fine, comb-like lacinia mobilis; pars molaris peripherally serrate; inner surface with blunt apophysis. Lower lip with slender, setose lobes ( Figure 11D View Figure 11 ). First maxilla outer endite ( Figure 11E View Figure 11 ) with seven elongate distal spines and setose outer margin.
First pereopod ( Figure 12A View Figure 12 ) merus and carpus dorsally lobate, propodus with lateral rows of spines, single distal plumose spine; dactylus and claw robust.
Pereopod 2 ( Figure 12B View Figure 12 ) articles simply setose; basis twice as long as wide, of similar width throughout; ischium with ventrodistal lobe bearing two setae; merus and carpus 1.3 times as long as wide with ventrodistal setal groups; propodus reduced with pair of slender, finely plumose distal setae. Pereopod 3 ( Figure 12C View Figure 12 ) similar to pereopod 2, but basis expanding distally, ischium without ventrodistal lobe, merus with dorsal setae, carpus 1.6 times as long as wide with midventral setae. Pereopod 4 ( Figure 12D View Figure 12 ) cylindrical, simple; distal dactylar plumose setae shorter than those of pereopods 2 and 3. Pereopods 1 to 4 with oostegites, that of pereopod 4 largest by far ( Figure 12E View Figure 12 ).
Pereopods 5 to 7 (e.g. Figure 12F View Figure 12 ) similar to and progressively smaller than each other; small dorsal lobes on ischium and merus.
First pleopod exopod operculiform, with three sigmoid spines (‘‘retinaculae’’) on inner margin of basis ending in fine teeth. Uropod ( Figure 12G View Figure 12 ) with regularly setose outer margin; distal seta of inner ramus finely plumose.
Distinctions of other life stages
Juveniles ( Figure 10B View Figure 10 ): first pereonite distinct from cephalon; pereonites 1 to 4 parallel, continuous with rest of body and with dorsal ridges; pereonites 5 to 7 and pleonites similar to adult female. Pigmentation sparse or absent.
Subadult males ( Figure 10C View Figure 10 ) with parallel-sided body, as large as adult female; pereonites 1 to 3 fused to cephalon (single suture apparent dorsally); pleonites fused to pleotelson. Parallel dorsal ridges present on pereonite 4 and anterior pleon. Pigmentation as adult female, variable. Antennule ( Figure 11A View Figure 11 ) flagellar article more elongate than in female, with numerous aesthetascs. Pleopods as adult female.
Adult male ( Figures 10D, F View Figure 10 ) without pigmentation, pereonites 1 to 4 fused with cephalon, and bearing parallel dorsal ridges; pleon completely fused without dorsal ridges. Antennule as subadult male ( Figure 11A View Figure 11 ). Pleopod 1 rami subequal in length, longer than protopod, exopod with indentation just proximal of midlength bearing three plumose setae and tuft of fine setae. Pleopod 2 ( Figure 11F View Figure 11 ) rami subequal in length, longer than protopod, endopod bearing slender, distally-trifid appendix masculina (‘‘stylet’’) on outer margin longer than rami.
Etymology
From the Latin for a parrot (noun in apposition), the companion of the Expedition’s pirate (see under Cyathura peirates ).
Remarks
The present species shows the characteristic lozenge-shaped morphology of the cephalon and anterior four pereonites of the mature female, as well as the gross morphology of the mouthparts, pereopods, uropods and male pleopods all consistent with the described species of Arcturina .
The most recent and comprehensive treatment of the genus was that of Kensley (1975), who distinguished between four species of Arcturina , all from northwestern or southern Africa, but did not include A. cylindralis Pillai, 1963 , a species described from a subadult male from the southern tip of India ( Pillai 1963).
Pillai (loc. cit.) mistakenly distinguished Arcturina cylindralis on its cylindrical fourth pereonite, not realizing that it was not a female. It can be distinguished from the African species and the present species by the large inner ‘‘expansions’’ (lobes) on the carpus and propodus of pereopod 7.
All of the five described species have a widened carpus and propodus on pereopods 2 and 3, the propodus on pereopod 2 at least being as wide as long. Arcturina psittacus sp. nov. does not have this feature. In addition, the fusion of the pereonites and pleonites in the present species is distinct, notably in the complete fusion of the cephalon and pereonites 1 to 4 in the adult male. The present material has allowed the description of developmental stages for the first time, showing the retention of the juvenile body segmentation into the adult female, but its progressive reduction in the male.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.