Cacostola simplex ( Pascoe, 1859 ),
publication ID |
http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3676627 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0F4263E0-1CBC-4046-95C8-74FDBD6D4325 |
DOI |
http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3681505 |
persistent identifier |
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/4836E338-FFCD-B905-FF2D-FDE8FDA4FB1F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cacostola simplex ( Pascoe, 1859 ) |
status |
|
Cacostola simplex ( Pascoe, 1859)
( Fig. 44View Figures 38–44)
Pachypeza simplex Pascoe 1859: 55 ; Nearns et al. 2014: 265 (holotype).
Cacostola simplex ; Bates 1866: 31; Thomson 1868: 68; Lacordaire 1872: 687; Prudhomme 1906: 36 (distr.); Aurivillius 1923: 352 (cat.); Blackwelder 1946: 605 (checklist); Dillon and Dillon 1946: 262; Breuning 1949: 27 (syn.); Buck 1959: 601 (distr.); Marinoni and Martins 1982: 247 (reval.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 195 (checklist); Monné 1994: 36 (cat.); 2005: 538 (cat.); Monné and Hovore 2006: 275 (checklist); Monné et al. 2012: 43 (distr.); Morvan and Roguet 2013: 29 (distr.); Monné 2018: 730 (cat.).
Trestonia simplex ; Gemminger 1873: 3128 (cat.).
According to Marinoni and Martins (1982) (translated): “The holotype of C. simplex has features (especially those referring to pronotal pubescence) that allow identifying it as a distinct species from volvula and, accordingly must be revalidated.” We do not see significant differences in the pronotal pubescence of those two species. However, the distance between the upper eye lobes is distinctly greater in P. volvula (larger than three times width of one lobe ( Fig. 5View Figures 1–10)) than in C. simplex ( Fig. 44View Figures 38–44) (slightly narrower than twice width of one lobe) and the width of the upper eye lobes is wider in C. simplex ( Fig. 44View Figures 38–44) than in C. volvula ( Fig. 5View Figures 1–10) thus are character differences that do support the revalidation of C. simplex by Marinoni and Martins (1982).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cacostola simplex ( Pascoe, 1859 )
Wappes, James E. & Santos-Silva, Antonio 2019 |
Cacostola simplex
Monne, M. A. 2018: 730 |
Morvan, O. & J. - P. Roguet 2013: 29 |
Monne, M. A. & E. H. Nearns & S. H. Carbonel Carril & I. P. Swift & M. L. Monne 2012: 43 |
Monne, M. A. & F. T. Hovore 2006: 275 |
Monne, M. A. 2005: 538 |
Monne, M. A. & E. F. Giesbert 1994: 195 |
Monne, M. A. 1994: 36 |
Marinoni, R. C. & U. R. Martins 1982: 247 |
Buck, P. 1959: 601 |
Breuning, S. 1949: 27 |
Blackwelder, R. E. 1946: 605 |
Dillon, L. S. & E. S. Dillon 1946: 262 |
Aurivillius, C. 1923: 352 |
Prudhomme, F. 1906: 36 |
Lacordaire, J. T. 1872: 687 |
Thomson, J. 1868: 68 |
Bates, H. W. 1866: 31 |
Pachypeza simplex
Nearns, E. H. & M. V. L. Barclay & G. L. Tavakilian 2014: 265 |
Pascoe, F. P. 1859: 55 |
Trestonia simplex
Gemminger, M. 1873: 3128 |