Balcus Sharp, 1877
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5383.3.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E5C8FDF6-58FF-47A5-81C2-CA54994AA2FE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10392908 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4D5D8792-8827-4752-A2AD-8ED7FC0AECF5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Balcus Sharp |
status |
|
Genus Balcus Sharp
Balcus violaceus (Fabricius) : Schenkling’s (1906: 265) inclusion of Australia in the distribution of Balcus signatus Broun was followed by a question mark in parentheses, indicating doubt. Opitz (2013) synonymised B. signatus with B. violaceus , rendering the genus monotypic. It is possible that Schenkling had before him the Australian species, Orthrius sepulcralis (Westwood) , which bears strong superficial resemblance to maculate specimens of Balcus violaceus . This author has not encountered a single Australian-collected Balcus specimen.
Of relevance, and worth documenting here, is past confusion around the identity of Chalciclerus pantomelas Boisduval. While documenting Australian clerid types in MNHN, Paris, I found two possible syntype specimens of ‘ Chalciclerus pantomelas ’, a species described from Australia (Western Port in Victoria) and now assigned to the genus Eleale Newman : one labelled ‘ Chalciclerus pantomelas Boisduval , Australie, Port Western, D’Urville—1829 / TYPE’ ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 ), clearly an Eleale ; the other, labelled ‘N. Zealande, Pantomelas, Ex Museo Minisz (Coll. Oberthur) / SYNTYPE?’ ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–8 ), clearly a specimen of Balcus violaceus (Fabricius) . Though presently assigned to Eleale and considered an Australian species (supported by the labels on the first-mentioned syntype, and the illustration of a very Eleale -like C. pantomelas published by Boisduval 1835, see t. 6, f. 14), ‘ pantomelas ’ had, in the past, been referred to as a New Zealand species ( White 1846, Broun 1880, Hudson 1934, Corporaal 1950a). For the record, to prevent future confusion potentially resulting in erroneous synonymy of Eleale pantomelas with Balcus violaceus , I state clearly here that the second-mentioned, Ex Museo Minisz, type, potentially the reason White (1846) considered pantomelas a New Zealand species, is not a type specimen of Chalciclerus pantomelas Boisduval , Balcus violaceus Fabricius , either synonym of the latter (i.e., Balcus niger Sharp or Balcus signatus Broun ), or of any other species.
Distribution: New Zealand ( Opitz 2013).
Status: Balcus violaceus is non-native and absent in Australia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.