Sparianthis Simon, 1880
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5496.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0EE7F5B4-79D2-4B6A-95FD-C5697292F960 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13346833 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4D7187A3-FF90-C968-FF0A-F9973BECFBC4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sparianthis Simon, 1880 |
status |
|
Genus Sparianthis Simon, 1880 View in CoL
Diagnosis and description. See Rheims (2020).
Composition. Nineteen species: S. beebei Rheims, 2020 ; S. boraris Rheims, 2020 ; S. boibumba spec. nov.., S. caracarai Rheims, 2020 ; S. cascalheira spec. nov., S. chicaque spec. nov., S. chickeringi ( Gertsch, 1941) ; S. crulsi ( Mello-Leitão, 1930) ; S. granadensis ( Keyserling, 1880) ; S. humaita Rheims, 2020 ; S. iguaque spec. nov., S. juazeiro Rheims, 2020 ; S. juruti Rheims, 2020 ; S. matupiri spec. nov., S. medina spec. nov., S. megalopalpa ( Caporiacco, 1954) ; S. picta ( Simon, 1887) , S. ravida ( Simon, 1898) and S. tuparro spec. nov.
Distribution. Neotropical region: northern South America, Panama and the islands of St. Vincent and Trinidad.
Identification key for all species of Sparianthis (updated from Rheims 2020).
1 Males .............................................................................................. 2
- Females............................................................................................ 18
2(1) Palpal tibia with a medial-retrolateral, modified spine ( Figs 10E View FIGURES 10 , 11C View FIGURES 11 ; Rheims 2020: figs 99, 104, 121, 124)............. 3
- Palpal tibia without a medial-retrolateral, modified spine (e.g. Figs 5E View FIGURES 5 , 7C View FIGURES 7 , 19C View FIGURES 19 ; Rheims 2020: figs 13, 23, 50)........... 5
3(2) Embolus short, with ventral hyaline membrane; TBC with retrolateral part strongly protruding and distally rounded; MA elongate roughly three times longer than wide, with the same width throughout the entire length ( Figs 10D View FIGURES 10 , 11B View FIGURES 11 ; Rheims 2020: figs 123–124)........................................................................................ 4
- Embolus long, with subdistal pointed projection; TBC keel-like, not protruding distally; MA short, slightly longer than wide, apically widened with medially indented margin ( Rheims 2020: figs 98–99, 103–104)......................... S. juruti
4(3) Medial-retrolateral modified spine with slender, pointed tip; TBE roughly sub-squared, with apical projection widened and twisted ( Rheims 2020: figs 120–121; 123–124)........................................................ S. picta
- Medial retrolateral modified spine robust with truncated tip ( Figs 10E View FIGURES 10 , 11C View FIGURES 11 ); TBE with apical projection long and slender, more than four times longer than wide ( Figs 10D View FIGURES 10 , 11D View FIGURES 11 )........................................... S. matupiri spec. nov.
5(2) TBE with elongate apical projection accompanying embolus throughout most of its length (e.g. 1D, 2B, 2D, 5D, 7B, 7D; Rheims 2020: figs 112–113, 115–116)..................................................................... 6
- TBE with short apical projection, not accompanying embolus (e.g. Figs 17D View FIGURES 17 , 19B View FIGURES 19 ; Rheims 2020: figs 22, 27, 59, 64)..... 11
6(2) mRTA present (e.g. Figs 1E View FIGURES 1 , 2C View FIGURES 2 ; Rheims 2020: figs 113, 116).................................................. 7
- mRTA absent (e.g. Figs 5E View FIGURES 5 , 7C View FIGURES 7 , 12E View FIGURES 12 , 14C View FIGURES 14 )................................................................. 9
7(6) mRTA closer to vRTA than to dRTA; dRTA short, concave, barely reaching the margin of the alveolus ( Figs 3E View FIGURES 3 , 4C View FIGURES 4 ; Rheims 2020: figs 113, 116)................................................................................... 8
- mRTA distinctly separated from vRTA; dRTA long, finger-like and curved, tip ventrad, surpassing the margin of the alveolus ( Figs 1E View FIGURES 1 , 2C View FIGURES 2 )...................................................................... S. boibumba spec. nov.
8(7) mRTA single branched, half the size of vRTA ( Figs 3E View FIGURES 3 , 4C View FIGURES 4 ); TBE with apical projection tapering and pointed, slightly shorter than embolus ( Figs 3D View FIGURES 3 , 4B, 4D View FIGURES 4 )....................................................... S. cascalheira spec. nov.
- mRTA bifid (best seen in retrolateral view), as long as vRTA ( Rheims 2020: figs 113, 116); TBE with apical projection longer than embolus, cylindrical, widened at tip and with subapical prong ( Rheims 2020: figs 112–113, 115–116).. S. megalopalpa
9(6) Tibia without retrolateral spines; vRTA smaller than dRTA ( Figs 5E View FIGURES 5 , 7C View FIGURES 7 , 8E View FIGURES 8 , 9C View FIGURES 9 ).................................. 10
- Tibia armed with two prolateral long spines; vRTA and dRTA similar sized ( Figs 12E View FIGURES 12 , 14C View FIGURES 14 ).......... S. medina spec. nov.
10(9) Embolus shorter than apical projection, distally acute ( Figs 5E View FIGURES 5 , 7C–D View FIGURES 7 ); TBC long, keel-like, strongly projecting retrolaterally ( Figs 5D View FIGURES 5 , 7B View FIGURES 7 )....................................................................... S. chicaque spec. nov.
- Embolus as long as apical projection, laminar and distally wide with median pointed projection on anterior margin ( Figs 8E View FIGURES 8 , 9C–D View FIGURES 9 ); TBC short, keel-like, not projecting ( Figs 8D View FIGURES 8 , 9B View FIGURES 9 )..................................... S. iguaque spec. nov.
11(5) mRTA present (e.g. Figs 17E View FIGURES 17 , 19C View FIGURES 19 ; Rheims 2020: figs 60, 65, 134, 139); embolus slender, roughly the same width throughout its length, without abrupt narrowing (e.g. Figs 17D View FIGURES 17 , 19B View FIGURES 19 ; Rheims 2020: figs 12, 33)............................... 12
- mRTA absent ( Rheims 2020: figs 77, 82); embolus laminar, abruptly narrowing sub-apically ( Rheims 2020: figs 81, 82)................................................................................................ S. humaita
12(11) mRTA closer to vRTA than to dRTA (e.g. Rheims 2020: figs 34, 45, 50)......................................... 13
- mRTA closer to dRTA than to vRTA ( Figs 17E View FIGURES 17 , 19C View FIGURES 19 ; Rheims 2020: figs 60, 65)................................... 16
13(12) mRTA smaller than vRTA and dRTA, tubercle-like; vRTA single branched ( Rheims 2020: figs 34, 45, 50 134, 139)....... 14
- mRTA at least as large as dRTA; vRTA bifid in retrolateral view ( Rheims 2020: figs 23, 28)................... S. boraris
14(13) Embolus simple, slender, with no projections or small sub-apical tooth-like projection ( Rheims 2020: figs 44, 49, 133, 138). .................................................................................................. 15
- Embolus wider, with sub-apical keel-like projection ( Rheims 2020: figs 33, 35)........................... S. caracarai
15(14) TBE with apical projection short and laminar; TBC wide, keel-like, embolus with small sub-apical tooth-like projection ( Rheims 2020: figs 133, 138–139)......................................................................... S. ravida
- TBE with apical projection gutter-shaped; TBC reduced to small keel, embolus with no projections ( Rheims 2020: figs 44–45, 49–50).................................................................................... S. chickeringi
16(12) vRTA larger than mRTA ( Rheims 2020: figs 13, 60, 65); TBC keel-like, wide, more than two times wider than long ( Rheims 2020: figs 12, 59, 64)................................................................................. 17
- vRTA smaller than mRTA ( Figs 17E View FIGURES 17 , 19C View FIGURES 19 ); TBC short, roughly as long as wide ( Figs 17D View FIGURES 17 , 19B View FIGURES 19 )...... S. tuparro spec. nov.
17(16) TBE with apical projection short and laminar ( Rheims 2020, fig. 64)...................................... S. crulsi
- TBE with apical projection resembling a fishtail ( Rheims 2020: figs 12–13)................................. S. beebei
18(1) Anterior and lateral furrows discontinuous (e.g. Figs 18C View FIGURES 18 , 19D View FIGURES 19 ; Rheims 2020: figs 46, 51, 61, 66, 78,83)............... 19
- Anterior and lateral furrows continuous (e.g. Figs 6C View FIGURES 6 , 7E View FIGURES 7 ; Rheims 2020: figs 24, 29, 125)........................... 25
19(18) Lateral furrows widely separated from anterior furrow ( Rheims 2020: figs 46, 51, 100, 106)......................... 20
- Lateral furrows reaching anterior furrow ( Figs 18C View FIGURES 18 , 19D View FIGURES 19 ; Rheims 2020: figs 14, 90)............................... 23
20(19) Anterior furrow with lateral tips extending posteriorly, AA with transversal grooves ( Rheims 2020: figs 78, 83, 100, 106).. 21
- Anterior furrow with lateral tips gently curved, not extending posteriorly, AA smooth ( Rheims 2020: figs 61, 66)........ 22
21(20) Anterior furrow gently curved, almost straight ( Rheims 2020: figs 78, 83); IDS as wide as spermathecae; first winding laterad ( Rheims 2020: figs 79, 84–85)................................................................... S. humaita
- Anterior furrow more strongly curved ( Rheims 2020: figs 100, 106); IDS slender, half the width of spermathecae; first winding posteriad ( Rheims 2020: figs 110, 107–108).......................................................... S. juruti
22(20) Anterior furrow medially depressed; LL with secondary longitudinal furrows ( Rheims 2020: figs 46, 51); GP small, posteromediad ( Rheims 2020: figs 47, 52–53).......................................................... S. chickeringi
- Anterior furrow straight; LL smooth, without secondary furrows ( Rheims 2020: figs 61, 66); GP large, antero-laterad ( Rheims 2020: figs 62, 67–68)............................................................................ S. crulsi
23(19) MS wider than long or as wide as long ( Figs 18C View FIGURES 18 , 19D View FIGURES 19 ; Rheims 2020: fig. 14); first winding anteriad ( Figs 18D View FIGURES 18 , 19E–F View FIGURES 19 ; Rheims 2020: figs 15–16).................................................................................... 24
- MS longer than wide ( Rheims 2020: fig. 90); first winding mediad ( Rheims 2020: figs 91–92)................ S. juazeiro
24(23) MS wider than long; AA widest medially ( Rheims 2020: fig. 14); first winding reaching half the EF length; spermathecae round ( Rheims 2020: figs 15–16)........................................................................ S. beebei
- MS as long as wide; AA widest posteriorly ( Figs 18C View FIGURES 18 , 19D View FIGURES 19 ); first winding surpassing half the EF length; spermathecae oval ( Figs 18D View FIGURES 18 , 19E–F View FIGURES 19 ).................................................................... S. tuparro spec. nov.
25(18) MS light bulb-shaped ( Rheims 2020: figs 69–70, 125)....................................................... 26
- MS not light bulb-shaped (e.g. Figs 6C View FIGURES 6 , 7E View FIGURES 7 , 15A View FIGURES 15 , 16A View FIGURES 16 ; Rheims 2020: figs 36, 135, 140)............................ 27
26(25) AA oval; leg metatarsi I–II with three pairs of ventral spines ( Rheims 2020: fig. 125).......................... S. picta
- AA sub-rectangular ( Rheims 2020: figs 69–70); leg metatarsi I–II with two pairs of ventral spines.......... S. granadensis
27(25) AA distinctly larger than MS (e.g. Figs 15A View FIGURES 15 , 16A View FIGURES 16 ; Rheims 2020: figs 24, 29)..................................... 28
- AA roughly the same size or smaller than MS (e.g. Figs 13D View FIGURES 13 , 14F View FIGURES 14 ; Rheims 2020: fig. 36)........................... 30
28(27) AA roughly squared, as wide as long ( Rheims 2020: figs 29, 140); IDS reaching half AA length ( Rheims 2020: figs 30, 141). .................................................................................................. 29
- AA roughly bean-shaped, wider than long ( Figs 15A View FIGURES 15 , 16A View FIGURES 16 ); IDS reaching anterior margin of AA ( Figs 15B View FIGURES 15 , 16B View FIGURES 16 )................................................................................................. S. megalopalpa
29(28) MS widest anteriorly, with posterior margin rounded ( Rheims 2020: Figs 24, 29); vulva with spermathecae elongate ( Rheims 2020: figs 25, 30).............................................................................. S. boraris
- MS anteriorly narrowed, with posterior margin straight or slightly sinuous ( Rheims 2020: figs 135, 140); vulva with spermathecae rounded ( Rheims 2020: figs 136, 141)............................................................... S. ravida
30(27) Anterior margin of AA almost straight; MS without lateral margins extending into AA ( Figs 6C View FIGURES 6 , 7E View FIGURES 7 ; Rheims 2020: fig. 36) 31
- Anterior margin of AA rounded; MS with lateral margins extending distinctly into AA ( Figs 13C View FIGURES 13 , 14E View FIGURES 14 ) S. medina spec. nov.
31(30) Posterior margin of MS surpassing the epigastric furrow; AA smaller than MS; roughly squared, as wide as long ( Rheims 2020: fig. 36); IDS with first winding mediad ( Rheims 2020: figs 37–38)..................................... S. caracarai
- Posterior margin of MS not surpassing the epigastric furrow; AA roughly the same size as MS, trapezoid, widest anteriorly ( Figs 6C View FIGURES 6 , 7E View FIGURES 7 ); IDS with first winding anteriad ( Figs 6D View FIGURES 6 , 7F–G View FIGURES 7 )................................ S. chicaque spec. nov.
GP |
Instituto de Geociencias, Universidade de Sao Paulo |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.