Archaeoteleia robusta Masner
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.179829 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6248055 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4E1A9E0C-FF85-094B-47DF-FD2179C6A17B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Archaeoteleia robusta Masner |
status |
sp. nov. |
Archaeoteleia robusta Masner , new species
Figures 64–67 View FIGURES 64 – 67
Description: Female. Length 3.6 mm. Color: body generally dark brown; prothorax, including side of pronotum, tegula, clypeus, mandible (except tips), radicle, palpi, fore legs, trochanters and tibiae lighter, light brown to yellow.
Head ( Figs. 65–67 View FIGURES 64 – 67 ): vertex, frons, gena rugose punctate, covered with fine dense appressed micropilosity, with only very few stiff bristles; eye distinctly setose; LOL less than OOL; occipital carina well developed, complete, distinctly crenulate, particularly at sides; median keel short, delicate, not reaching beyond midpoint of height of frons; facial striae well developed, reaching almost to level of middle of inner orbit; clypeus broadly triangular, with transverse rugulosity; toruli contiguous with upper margin of clypeus; antenna overall relatively short and stout: A1 6.0 times as long as wide; A2 2.3 times as long as wide; A3 1.6 times as long as A2; flagellum with short setae; claval formula A6–A12/1-2-2-2-2-2-1.
Mesosoma ( Figs. 66–67 View FIGURES 64 – 67 ): transverse pronotal carina sharp, perfectly straight, with anterolateral corners acute, but not projecting spinelike; vertical epomial carina present, sharp, originating at anterolateral corner, extending toward fore coxa; horizontal epomial carina sharp, running far from mesoscutum, pronotal shoulders very broad, rugose punctate with dense appressed pilosity, several stiff black erect bristles; lateral pronotum deeply concave, predominantly with large smooth shining glabrous area, leaving only dorsoposterior margin with deep punctation; netrion well defined; mesoscutum in lateral view almost flattened, very broad, densely rugose punctate, with dense appressed micropilosity, and scattered erect black bristles; admedian lines short; notaulus complete, deeply incised, distinctly crenulate; parapsidal line present; transscutal articulation deep, distinctly foveolate; scutellum broad, 0.4 times length of mesoscutum, much wider than long, with same sculpture as mesoscutum, with only few stiff bristles; scutellar spines strong, about as long as disk of scutellum, directed posteriorly; mesopleural carina reduced to rudiment, situated anteriorly; mesopleural depression in upper part smooth, shining, glabrous, with several longitudinal keels below tegula, mesepisternum predominantly punctured, with scattered setae; acetabular carina fine, complete; line of foveae along posterior margin of mesopleuron present, but not extending ventrally as far as mid coxa; metapleuron only sparsely setose, predominantly rugose punctate, with several transverse rugae near propodeum; propodeum with scattered setae, irregularly rugulose, deeply excavate medially, medial excavation almost smooth, glabrous, median carinae present, sharply defined, not raised in profile; macropterous, fore wing relatively short, narrow, not surpassing apex of metasoma, reaching posteriorly only to T5, generally moderately infuscate, distinct cloud of pigmentation sometimes present; R between tegula and marginal vein with 10 long, erect, stiff black bristles; postmarginal vein tubular, clearly longer than short stigmal vein; stigma short, curved; basal vein pigmented; M, Cu, Rs moderately pigmented as nebulous veins; legs exceptionally short, stout, especially femora; tibial spurs of mid leg, hind leg unusually long, strong; hind femur strongly incrassate; hind coxa only slightly longer than mid coxa, without transverse wrinkles at apex, deeply punctured.
Metasoma ( Figs. 64, 67 View FIGURES 64 – 67 ) short, robust, length 2.6 times width; T1 trapezoidal, length 0.6–0.7 times width, longitudinally costate, trapezoidal, horn short, almost upright, with sharp crest along midline, with deep punctures, without costae; length of T2 0.5 times width; length of T3 0.5 times width; length of T4 0.4 times width; length of T5 0.4 times width; T2–T5 generally longitudinally costate, mid portion of T3–T5 gradually smoother, without costae; length of T6 1.2–1.5 times width, with abundant setigerous punctures.
Male. Very similar to female, even in normally secondary sexual characters; differing as follows: length 3.1 mm; eye slightly smaller; keels present on A4, A5; length of A1 5.6 times width; length of A2 2.1 times width; length of A3 0.6 times length of A1; fore wing variable in length, extending to end of T4 or to tip of metasoma; metasoma with strong, sharp, pyramidal, setose point on anteromedian margin of T1, propodeum with corresponding excavation; length of metasoma 2.2–2.4 times width.
Diagnosis. Distinct among all Archaeoteleia by the flattened mesoscutum, scutellum and scutellar spines; presence of strong, acute vertical epomial carina; and the stout, strong legs. This species is comprised of robust, stout individuals. The only other species with A1 longer than A3 is male A. pygmea . From that species, A. robusta is distinguished by the darker body color, the presence of black stiff bristles on the mesosoma, the projection of the anteromedial portion of T 1 in the male (very similar to the horn in the female), and the presence of notauli.
Etymology. The specific epithet robusta refers to the body shape.
Link to Distribution Map. [http://atbi.biosci.ohio-state.edu:210/hymenoptera/eol_scelionidae.content _page?page_level=3&page_id=taxon_page_data&page_version= 190986 &page_option1=M]
Material examined. Holotype female: CHILE: Chiloé I., Ahoni Alto, XII.1988 – III.1989, L.E. Peña, Malaise trap, primary forest. Deposited in CNCI.
Paratypes: CHILE: Araucanía, 3 km W Victoria, 100 m, mixed Nothofagus forest, Malleco Prov., 13.XII.1984 – 12.II.1985, J. Peck, S. Peck, female, OSUC 146614 (CNCI); Contulmo National Monument, 350 m, mixed evergreen forest, Purén, Malleco Prov., 11.XII.1984 – 13.II.1985, J. Peck, S. Peck, female, OSUC 146606 (CNCI); Sendero Lemu Mau, 38°00.74'S 7311.13'W, 410 m, Mon. Nat. de Contulmo, Prov. de Malleco, 8–24.XII.2002, A. Newton, et al., female, OSUC 146612 (CNCI).
Bío-Bío, Carampangue, Prov. de Arauco, 22.I.1978, T. Cekalovic, female, OSUC 146615 (CNCI).
Los Lagos, 11 km W Quemchi, 42°10.40'S 73°35.73'W, 140 m, 2002-066, Valdivian forest remnant with thick bamboo understory, Chiloé Prov., 10–21.XII.2002, Clarke, Newton, Thayer, female, OSUC 146610 (CNCI); Los Lagos, Ahoni, 70m, primary forest, Isla Chiloé, Los Lagos Reg., Chile, 22.II.1988, III.1988, IV.1988, L. Masner, 5 females, OSUC 146608, 203916–203919 (CNCI); Ahoni, primary forest, Chiloé Isl., IX.1988, X.1988, XII.1988 – III.1989, L.E. Peña, 4 females, OSUC 203921, 203923–203925 (CNCI); Chiloé National Park, 42°37.36'S 74°06.82'W, 1 m, low dune evergreen forest with large ferns and shrubby understory, Dunas de Cucao trail, Chiloé Prov., 11–22.XII.2002, A. Newton, M. Thayer, female, OSUC 146611 (CNCI); Petrohué Waterfall, 150 m, mixed moist forest, Vicente Pérez Rosales N.P., Llanquihue Prov., 23.XII.1984 – 4.II.1985, J. Peck, S. Peck, female, OSUC 146613 (CNCI); Terao, 42°42'22"S 73°39'12"W, 10 m, UCR AToL C05-016, beach / shrub forest, 10 km S Chonchi, Chiloé Isl., 13.II.2005, female, OSUC 203934 (CNCI); Terao, 42°43'01"S 73°38'47"W, 45 m, UCR AToL C05-013, 10 km S Chonchi, Chiloé Isl., 12–13.II.2005, 8 females, OSUC 203926–203933 (CNCI); Terao, 50 m, 2nd growth forest, nr. Chonchi, Chiloé Isl., 20.II.1988, 23.II.1988, L. Masner, 1 male, 3 females, OSUC 146609, 203915, 203920, 203935 (CNCI); Valdivia, ~3947'S, 7316'W, Isla Teja, Prov. de Valdivia, 7.II.1966, M. Erwin, female, OSUC 146605 (CNCI).
Maule, Altos de Vilches, 1300 m, Nothofagus forest, 70 km E Talca, 5.XII.1984 – 20.II.1985, J. Peck, S. Peck, male, OSUC 146607 (CNCI); Prov. Curicó, Los Niches 10 km E Curicó, 6–17.IV.1998, J.E. Barriga, Malaise trap, 2 females, OSUC 174514, 174515 (UCDC).
Comments: There is an almost negligible amount of variation among the 31 females available. Only 2 males are known, an unusual inversion of the typical collecting sex ratio.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |