Sparianthis picta ( Simon, 1887 ) Rheims, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4890.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5EF7FF4A-0857-415F-B30F-DA2910F5B6EB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4333394 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4E338797-8700-FFD0-D8E9-7F51FAF1FA78 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sparianthis picta ( Simon, 1887 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Sparianthis picta ( Simon, 1887) View in CoL comb. nov.
Figs 117–127 View FIGURES 117–121 View FIGURES 122–127 , 143 View FIGURES 143–144
Pseudosparianthis picta Simon, 1887: 473 View in CoL
(Syntypes 1³, 1♀, Peru, Loreto, Pebas [-3.3201, -71.8609] and GoogleMaps Brazil, Amazonas , S ã o Paulo de Olivença [-3.4740, -68.9614], Mathan leg., MNHN 7213 , examined). World Spider Catalog 2020. GoogleMaps
Additional material examined. PERU: Loreto: 1³, San Juan Bautista, Carretera Iquitos-Nautla , OTAE (-4.0008, -73.4409), 10 April 2013 GoogleMaps , C.A. Rheims & R. P. Indicatti leg. ( IBSP 165063 View Materials ) .
Diagnosis. Males of S. picta resemble those S. juruti sp. nov. by the palpal tibia with strong medial-retrolateral spine ( Figs 104 View FIGURES 102–108 , 124 View FIGURES 122–127 ). They are distinguished from the latter species by the spine at least three times longer than wide (two times longer than wide in S. juruti sp. nov.) ( Fig. 124 View FIGURES 122–127 ). They are further distinguished from all other spe-cies of the genus by short embolus with wide, ventral, hyaline membrane ( Fig. 123 View FIGURES 122–127 ). Females resemble those of S. granadensis by the epigyne with median septum light bulb-shaped and anterior atrium wider than long ( Figs 70 View FIGURES 69–70 , 125 View FIGURES 122–127 ). They are distinguished from the latter species by oval shape of the anterior atrium (rectangular in S. granadensis ) ( Fig. 125 View FIGURES 122–127 ) and presence of three pairs of ventral spines on leg metatarsi I–II (two pairs in S. granadensis ).
Redescription. Male (IBSP 165053): Prosoma brown, suffused with dark marbled pattern laterally. Chelicerae brown. Legs and pedipalps slightly lighter than prosoma. Labium brown, distally pale yellow. Endites pale yellow. Sternum pale yellow with slightly darker margins. Opisthosoma brownish cream colored; dorsally with scattered elongated marks laterally, on anterior half, few spots around cardiac mark and irregular marks scattered on posterior half; ventrally with few spots close to spinnerets and V-shaped lines of muscle sigilla extending along most of opisthosoma length ( Figs 117–118 View FIGURES 117–121 ). Total length: 6.7. Prosoma: 3.0 long, 2.6 wide. Opisthosoma: 3.6 long, 1.7 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.26, 0.17, 0.13, 0.19; interdistances: 0.17, 0.04, 0.34, 0.20, 0.13, 0.05. Legs (2143): I: 11.1 (3.2, 1.4, 2.9, 2.9, 0.7); II: 11.5 (3.3, 1.5, 3.0, 3.0, 0.7); III: 9.2 (2.8, 1.1, 2.3, 2.4, 0.6); IV: 10.9 (3.1, 1.1, 2.6, 3.1, 1.2). Spination follows the generic pattern except metatarsi I–II: v2-2-2. Metatarsus III with single ventral distal spine; metatarsus IV with ventral distal preening comb. Palp: tibia with prolateral spines long; vRTA reduced to small bump (best seen in retrolateral view); mRTA triangular; tegulum retrobasally indented, without retro-proximal protrusion, with hyaline lamina between TBE and TBC; TBC wide, keel-like, protruding retrolaterally; TBE squared, with apical projection widened and twisted ( Figs 119–124 View FIGURES 117–121 View FIGURES 122–127 ).
Redescription. Female (MNHN, syntype): Coloration pattern as in male, mostly darker. Total length: 7.7. Prosoma: 3.1 long, 2.6 wide. Opisthosoma: 4.2 long, 2.2 wide. Eyes: diameters: 0.20, 0.18, 0.12, 0.18; interdistances: 0.16, 0.14, 0.32, 0.22, 0.16, 0.08. Legs (2143): I: 10.2 (2.8, 1.5, 2.8, 2.5, 0.6); II: 10.3 (3.0, 1.5, 2.5, 2.6, 0.7); III: 8.2 (2.5, 1.2, 1.8, 2.1, 0.6); IV: 9.4 (2.6, 1.1, 2.2, 2.7, 0.8).Spination follows the generic pattern except tibiae I–II: v2-2- 2-2; tibia III: d0-0-1; metatarsi I–II: p1-0-0; v2-2-2. Metatarsus III–IV with ventral distal preening combs. Epigyne: epigynal field rectangular, slightly longer than wide; anterior atrium oval ( Fig. 125 View FIGURES 122–127 ). Vulva: internal ducts slender, half spermathecae width, with first turn laterad; glandular projection arising from duct close to copulatory opening; spermathecae rounded ( Figs 126–127 View FIGURES 122–127 ).
Variation. Males (n=2): total length: 6.7–7.0; prosoma length: 3.0–3.1; femur I length 3.1–3.2.
Distribution. Known from northeastern Peru (Loreto) and northwestern Brazil (Amazonas) ( Fig. 143 View FIGURES 143–144 ).
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Sparianthinae |
Genus |
Sparianthis picta ( Simon, 1887 )
Rheims, Cristina A. 2020 |
Pseudosparianthis picta
Simon, E. 1887: 473 |