Digitipes coonoorensis Jangi and Dass, 1984
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3626.1.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:58AD6857-8CDD-4423-88D0-619CD8D793AC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6154116 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4F7A87F2-FFD7-FFB1-FF0B-F9C0FDB2FB14 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Digitipes coonoorensis Jangi and Dass, 1984 |
status |
|
Digitipes coonoorensis Jangi and Dass, 1984 View in CoL
( Figs 13–23 View FIGURES 13 – 18 View FIGURES 19 – 23 )
Digitipes coonoorensis Jangi and Dass, 1984: 43 , figs 62–72. Digitipes coonoorensis . Sureshan et al. 2006: 2287.
Digitipes putative species 1. Joshi and Karanth, 2012: figs 2, 3, 5.
Diagnosis. Digitipes with basal three antennal articles glabrous dorsally. Tergite paramedian sutures complete from TT6 to 8; tergites fully marginate starting from 7 to 9; tergites smooth, longitudinal median ridge rarely present. Coxopleural process relatively long, stout, variably inflected outward in ventral view, lateral spine present; pore field terminating far beneath dorsal margin of coxopleuron; leg 20 without tarsal spur.
Material examined. 11 specimens of Digitipes putative species 1 ( D. coonoorensis of Joshi and Karanth, 2012), including CES07125, CES07132 and CES07134 from close to type locality; CES registration numbers in Joshi and Karanth (2012: fig. 2, Table S1). These individuals were collected largely in high elevation forests (<1800 msl) of the southern and central parts of the Western Ghats, India (distribution map in Joshi and Karanth 2012: fig. 5c); all leg. J. Joshi, 2007–2010.
Description. Length to 64 mm. 17 antennal articles, 18 on one side in one individual in which abnormally short distal articles suggest damage; basal three articles glabrous dorsally ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ), 2.3–2.5 articles glabrous ventrally. Cephalic plate and tergites finely punctate. Longitudinal median furrow 15–20% length of cephalic plate.
Colour variable: cephalic plate, basal (glabrous) part of antennae and T1 often blue; trunk may display gradual increase in brown pigment posteriorly, sometimes reverting to blue in posterior tergites; exceptionally cephalic plate and tergites all brown, or most of head and T1 brown with mostly blue tergites from T2; legs pale blue-brown.
Forcipular coxosternal tooth plate wider than long ( Figs 14, 15 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ), with four main teeth, the inner two usually grouped, the outer tooth smaller than the inner three ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ); bases of tooth plates defined by oblique sutures diverging at a relatively obtuse angle of 140–150°. Trochanteroprefemoral process with two distinct teeth along inner margin.
Second maxillary claw with slender, needle-like accessory spurs. Article 2 of telopodite bearing a long, slender, pigmented spine distally.
Tergites with paramedian sutures complete from TT6 to 8. Tergites marginate from 7, 8 or 9. Tergites smooth ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 19 – 23 ), longitudinal median ridge mostly absent, faint from T 9 in CES08960. Sternites usually with short paramedian sutures, ca 10% length of sternites in mid body region, at most about 25% length of sternites, sometimes with a short extent on posterior part of sternite.
Spiracle of segment 3 with narrow elliptical outline ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 19 – 23 ), long axis oblique to horizontal plane; spiracles from segment 5 with rounded outline, irregular inner margin of peritrema, long axis of spiracular opening vertical. All spiracles with regularly scalloped inner margin of peritrema, folding into a smooth band of trichomes beneath which atrium has strongly humped wall and floor.
First three (four in one individual) pairs of legs with two tarsal spurs, the subsequent up to 19 with one. Leg 20 without tarsal spur, except one individual. A tibial and a femoral spur on leg 1 only.
Tergite of ultimate leg-bearing segment with gently convex lateral margins that weakly converge posteriorly; posterior margin gently sinuous, bluntly pointed to rounded posteromedially ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ). Sternite of ultimate legbearing segment with sides converging posteriorly, nearly straight, posterior margin moderately concave ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ).
Coxopleural process moderately long, robustly conical, set off from course of posterolateral margin of coxopleuron by a pronounced inflection, its apex variably with a slight to distinct lateral orientation ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ); two apical spines, one lateral spine (absent on one side in two individuals). Coxopleural pores relatively dense, approximately bimodal size distribution; pore field relatively narrow, terminating moderately to strongly beneath dorsal margin of coxopleuron ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ); non-porose area on coxopleural process at least 60% length to posterior margin of sternite of ultimate leg-bearing segment, sometimes nearly reaching that margin ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 13 – 18 ). Ultimate leg prefemur with width at distal end about 30% its length. Prefemoral spines moderately large ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 19 – 23 ): VL 3 (small fourth spine rarely present), VM 2 (one specimen with 3 on one side), DM 0 or 1. Distomedial process in males bluntly conical, extending about as far as the distal end of the femur on its dorsal side ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 19 – 23 ); groove on medial surface of femur extending about half length of femur ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 19 – 23 ). Ultimate leg tarsus 1 1.6–2.5 times length of tarsus 2; tarsus 1 2.2–5 times longer than pretarsus; pretarsus with pair of short accessory claws.
Discussion. Absence of a leg 20 tarsal spur was used by Jangi and Dass (1984: 41) in the first couplet of their key to Indian species of Digitipes , allowing D. coonoorensis (spur absent) to be distinguished from D. barnabasi and D. indicus (spur present). We observe this character to remain reliable for separation of D. coonoorensis apart from one individual resolved within the species phylogenetically that possesses a spur.
A record of D. coonoorensis was made by Yadav (1993b: 324) from Sindhudurg, Maharashtra, more northerly than any material of the species examined by us. We have not seen the material and have not included the record in the synonymy. All the individuals examined here were found in the shola forests or grasslands of high elevation areas of the southern Western Ghats.
Light-microscopic description of the spiracles is included for this species. For comparative purposes, the spiracle on segment 3 is depicted for other species of the genus as well ( Figs 40, 45 View FIGURES 36 – 45 , 56 View FIGURES 52 – 56 , 67 View FIGURES 63 – 67 ), but we have not identified obvious taxonomic variation.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |