Epicadus granulatus Banks, 1909
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4382.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:87A2B333-09FF-4726-A1EF-0699FB631808 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5951308 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/501D87B1-6734-A430-2390-F95152BBBC7A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Epicadus granulatus Banks, 1909 |
status |
|
Epicadus granulatus Banks, 1909 View in CoL
Figs 5A–D View FIGURE 5 , 6A–D View FIGURE 6 , 15D View FIGURE 15
Epicadus granulatus Banks, 1909: 214 View in CoL , pl. 6, fig. 25. Silva-Moreira & Machado 2016: 300; Machado et al. 2017: 448, figs S4F, S8D. S15D.
Tobias inermis Mello-Leitão, 1929: 84 , figs. 177–178 (syntypes, 4 females from Rio Içá [6°28'56"S, 76°22'21"W, Tarapoto , Peru], deposited in MNHN 3403 About MNHN , examined). GoogleMaps
Type material: Holotype (original designation): female, Surubres [9°35'55"N, 84°18'07"W, Puntarenas, Costa Rica], ( MCZ 21488, examined). GoogleMaps
Other material examined: BRAZIL: Pará: 1 male, Novo Progresso, Campo de Provas Brigadeiro Velloso , 9°20′00"S, 54°57′53″W, 15 September 2003, D.R. Santos-Souza ( MPEG 005373 View Materials ). GoogleMaps
Note. Here we describe the male of E. granulatus for the first time. The locality of the single male examined and described here is distant from the terra typical of both, E. granulatus and its junior synonym inermis . We assume conspecifity of both sexes by a number of shared morphological features: 1) the reddish and nodose prosoma, 2) pale-yellow opisthosoma with vestigial lateral projections, 3) reduced eyes and high clypeus. Moreover, the male undoubtly belongs to the “ pustulosus clade” as proposed by Machado et al. (2017). It shows similar setiferous tubercles on the dorsum of the prosoma as the other species of that clade, E. pustulosus and E. caudatus .
Diagnosis. Females of E. granulatus are related to those of E. caudatus and E. pustulosus by the straight anterior border of opisthosoma and quadratic aspect of legs, and to E. camelinus by the curvature of copulatory ducts, shape and size of the spermathecae. However, it can be easily recognized by the reduced eyes, high clypeus ( Figs 5B View FIGURE 5 ), round opisthosoma with no lower lateral opisthosomal projections and vestigial lateral ones and by the transversal stains on femora I and II with leg segments getting gradually darker from the patellae to tarsi ( Figs 5A View FIGURE 5 , 15D View FIGURE 15 ). The epigynum is distinguished from those of other species by the elevated median field and a large septum that resembles a shape of a “pig snout” in ventral view ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ). The male presents a pair of vertical ocular mounds on the ALE, similarly to males of E. heterogaster , and the opisthosoma have only three projections as in males of E. trituberculatus and E. taczanowskii . From those it can be distinguished by the granulose prosoma with a set of tubercles on the thoracic area (which is more similar to those of E. caudatus and E. pustulosus ) ( Figs 6A, B View FIGURE 6 ) and by the palp with TF at seven o’clock position ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ).
Description. Female (from Tarapoto; MNHN 3403): Anterior eye row recurved and posterior procurved. Prosoma orange, without dark stripes or whitish stains and with scattered granules ( Figs 5A, B View FIGURE 5 ). Thoracic MS discrete (sometimes absent). Chelicerae, sternum, endites and labium orange. Opisthosoma predominantly dark brown and gnarled, with three opisthosomal projections—median posterior bigger than lateral ones and rounded, lateral ones reduced ( Figs 5A View FIGURE 5 , 15D View FIGURE 15 ). Epigynum in ventral view with a large septum and an elevated median field ( Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ); secondary spermathecae reduced and primary ones well developed and globular ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ).
Measurements: eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.13, ALE 0.16, PME 0.13, PLE 0.10, AME–AME 0.54, AME–ALE 0.20, PME–PME 0.72, PME–PLE 0.18; MOQ length 0.75, MOQ posterior width 0.76, MOQ anterior width 0.74; leg formula: 1-2-4-3: leg I—femur 5.67/ patella 3.08/ tibia 3.50/ metatarsus 2.42/ tarsus 1.67/ total 16.34; II—4.84/ 2.91/ 3.50/ 2.25/ 1.25/ 14.75; III—2.75/ 1.75/ 1.75/ 1.42/ 0.84/ 8.51; IV—3.00/ 1.58/ 2.08/ 1.67/ 0.84/ 9.17. Total body length 10.34; prosoma length 5.75, width 5.62; opisthosoma length 4.58; clypeus height 0.88; sternum length 2.62, width 2.00; endites length 1.10, width 0.70; labium length 0.82, width 0.90.
Male (from Novo Progresso; MPEG 005373): Eye arrangement as in females, ALE on vertical and spiniform ocular mounds; prosoma dark orange with remarkable tubercles on thoracic area ( Figs 6A, B View FIGURE 6 ). Sternum, labium and endites light orange; clypeus high, entirely dark orange, with no marks or spots. Opisthosoma light yellow with dark setae and three projections: lateral ones indistinct and median posterior stout and rounded ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ). Legs entirely light orange; femora I bears conspicuous setiferous tubercles on its ventral and dorsolateral surface. Palpi with discoid tegulum, RTA with tip bended retrolaterally and DTA directed upwards ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ); TF emerging from tegulum at seven o’clock ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ).
Measurements: eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.06, PME 0.05, PLE 0.04, AME–AME 0.16, AME–ALE 0.10, PME–PME 0.24, PME–PLE 0.10; MOQ length 0.30, MOQ posterior width 0.25, MOQ anterior width 0.24; leg formula: 1-2-4-3: leg I—femur 1.36/ patella 0.56/ tibia 0.80/ metatarsus 0.62/ tarsus 0.46/ total 3.80; II—0.98/ 0.56/ 0.78/ 0.59/ 0.44/ 3.35; III—0.58/ 0.34/ 0.42/ 0.35/ 0.24/ 1.93; IV—0.56/ 0.23/ 0.48/ 0.44/ 0.26/ 1.97. Total body length 2.74; prosoma length 1.46, width 1.36; opisthosoma length 1.28; clypeus height 0.36; sternum length 0.66, width 0.60; endites length 0.30, width 0.16; labium length 0.20, width 0.26.
Distribution. PERU: Tarapoto; BRAZIL: Amazonas; COSTA RICA: Surubres ( Fig. 17A View FIGURE 17 ).
MCZ |
Museum of Comparative Zoology |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Epicadus granulatus Banks, 1909
Machado, Miguel, Teixeira, Renato Augusto & Lise, Arno Antonio 2018 |
Epicadus granulatus
Banks, 1909 : 214 |
Silva-Moreira & Machado 2016 : 300 |
Machado et al. 2017 : 448 |
Tobias inermis Mello-Leitão, 1929 : 84
Mello-Leitão, 1929 : 84 |