Pteromalinae (Haliday, 1833)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.94.94263 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6CB80723-9A47-403F-ABEC-9AF8AE7F417F |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/50BFF56E-547E-5605-8B61-5426699763DB |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Pteromalinae |
status |
|
Diagnosis.
Antennal nearly always with 12 flagellomeres (exceptions: some Otitesellini , Amphidocius Dzhanokmen, possibly Termolampa ). Mandibles usually not falcate (exceptions include some Apsilocera Bouček and Kaleva Graham). Scapula not anteriorly exposed by pronotum. Notauli usually incomplete, but if complete then clypeus with median tooth or teeth, propodeum with plicae, or petiole distinct and not strongly transverse, e.g., Fijita . Axilla variable but usually not strongly advanced (exceptions: Manineura Bouček). Axillula usually not enlarged (Fig. 102 View Figures 97–102 ), but if enlarged then not convex. Fore wing with marginal vein usually slender, if distinctly thickened, e.g. Rhaphitelus Walker, then mandibles not falcate. Petiole simple or with small anterolateral processes.
Discussion.
Pachyneurinae differ from Pteromalinae in having a combination of falcate mandibles and an abruptly thickened marginal vein base immediately apical to the parastigmal break. Ormocerinae resemble some genera of Pteromalini that are retained with some doubt, but which differ from ormocerines in a number of respects discussed above. The few petiolate Pteromalinae differ from Miscogastrinae as follows: from Diconocarini in having small mandibles; from Miscogastrini in the symmetric clypeus; and from Sphegigastrini in the petiole structure, such as the lack of the characteristic anterolateral petiolar carina.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.