Metrodorinae, Bolivar, 1887
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5597.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E8B87293-0CCD-469D-9F2F-17F1AB4919BF |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/542B87FD-FFAB-0410-9FDE-C400FA5FFC3D |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2025-03-04 12:56:25, last updated 2025-03-04 13:35:17) |
|
scientific name |
Metrodorinae |
| status |
|
Key to tribes of Neotropical Metrodorinae View in CoL
1. Body depressed dorso-ventrally ( Figs. 121A View FIGURE 121 , 122A View FIGURE 122 , 125A View FIGURE 125 ). Vertex not projected between the eyes, slightly tapering and truncated anteriorly ( Figs. 121B View FIGURE 121 , 123B View FIGURE 123 , 124B View FIGURE 124 ). Mid-femur strongly expanded, dorsal and ventral margins of mid-femur lobed or foliaceous ( Figs. 121F View FIGURE 121 , 123F View FIGURE 123 ). Species camouflage frequently resembling lichens or bryophytes........... Amorphopini View in CoL
- Body not depressed dorso-ventrally ( Figs. 1A View FIGURE 1 , 15A View FIGURE 15 , 59 View FIGURE 59 ). Vertex variable in shape, projected or not between the eyes ( Figs. 1D View FIGURE 1 , 51B View FIGURE 51 ). Mid-femur thin, not strongly expanded, dorsal and ventral margins of mid-femur without lobes or foliaceous ( Figs. 10E View FIGURE 10 , 43E View FIGURE 43 ). Species rarely camouflage between lichens or bryophytes................................................ 2
2. Vertex whole expanded “horn-like” ( Figs. 77B View FIGURE 77 , 78B View FIGURE 78 ). Head in lateral view strongly oblique ( Figs. 77D View FIGURE 77 , 78A View FIGURE 78 , 80B View FIGURE 80 ), and in frontal view, scutellum very narrow ( Figs. 77C View FIGURE 77 , 80A View FIGURE 80 ). Fore and mid femora with almost straight upper and lower margins ( Figs.80D, E View FIGURE 80 ). Lower margin of the lateral lobes of the pronotum poorly projected to the sides and without any type of armature ( Figs. 80C View FIGURE 80 , 81B View FIGURE 81 , 83B View FIGURE 83 )............................................................. Metopomystrini trib. nov.
- Vertex not prolonged as a whole; if any head extension is observed, it is only the extension of the medial carina of the vertex, which is mostly wide in frontal view; scutellum variable ( Figs. 1D View FIGURE 1 , 10A View FIGURE 10 , 29A View FIGURE 29 ). Fore and mid femora with undulated upper and lower margins ( Figs. 10D View FIGURE 10 , 22D View FIGURE 22 , 29D View FIGURE 29 ). Lower margin of the lateral lobes of the pronotum moderately or well-projected towards the sides, with variable shapes, generally triangular, with or without spines ( Figs. 29C View FIGURE 29 , 45C View FIGURE 45 , 57C View FIGURE 57 , 67C View FIGURE 67 , 74C View FIGURE 74 )............. 3
3. Carinae of the vertex not produced at all, and medial carina low ( Figs. 108B View FIGURE 108 , 120A View FIGURE 120 ). Frontal costa straight and scutellum narrow ( Figs. 102C View FIGURE 102 , 104C View FIGURE 104 , 105C View FIGURE 105 , 112C View FIGURE 112 )......................................................... Otumbini trib. nov.
- Carinae of the vertex produced in different levels, mostly conspicuous, with lateral carinae forming more or less pronounced horns and medial carina visibly compresso-elevated ( Figs. 1A View FIGURE 1 , 16B View FIGURE 16 , 29B View FIGURE 29 ). Frontal costa rounded or divergent, rarely straight ( Figs. 1D View FIGURE 1 , 16A View FIGURE 16 , 29A View FIGURE 29 ).................................................................................. 4
4. Vertex almost 1.5 times wider than the eye, medial carina not strongly expressed, and vertex usually concave ( Figs. 85E View FIGURE 85 , 86C View FIGURE 86 , 89C View FIGURE 89 ). Scutellum narrow ( Figs. 87C View FIGURE 87 , 91C View FIGURE 91 , 97A View FIGURE 97 ). Median carinae of pronotum slightly elevated in some sections, pronotal disc mostly flat but with mid-sized undulations ( Figs. 86A View FIGURE 86 , 89A View FIGURE 89 , 91A View FIGURE 91 , 96A View FIGURE 96 ). Most species slender and winged.............................................................................................. Garciaitettigini trib. nov.
- Vertex approximately two times (or more) wider than the eye, medial carina strongly expressed, and vertex convex ( Figs. 1D View FIGURE 1 , 16A View FIGURE 16 , 29A View FIGURE 29 ). Scutellum mostly wider (rarely narrow) ( Figs. 7A View FIGURE 7 , 22A View FIGURE 22 , 34A View FIGURE 34 ). Median carinae of pronotum arcuate, mostly forming a crest in different shapes ( Figs. 10B View FIGURE 10 , 16B View FIGURE 16 , 22B View FIGURE 22 ). Most species robust and apterous....................... Metrodorini
FIGURE 1. Metrodora rana Bolívar, 1887. Male holotype. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Labels. C. Habitus in dorsal view. D. Frons. E. Head and pronotum in dorsal view. Photos: M. París (MNCN).
FIGURE 7. Platytettix uniformis Bruner, 1910 comb. rev. Male. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur.
FIGURE 10. Platytettix pilosus Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur.
FIGURE 15. Platytettix arcuatus Bruner, 1920 comb. rev. Male habitus A. Lateral and B. Dorsal views.
FIGURE 16. Platytettix arcuatus Bruner, 1920 comb. rev. Male. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur.
FIGURE 22. Platytettix gibbosulus (Walker, 1871) comb. nov. Female. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur. F–H. Terminalia in dorsal, lateral and ventral views respectively.
FIGURE 29. Cota caxiuana Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur. F–H. Terminalia in lateral, axial and ventral views respectively.
FIGURE 34. Hebardidora harroweri (Hebard, 1924) comb. nov. Male. A. Frons. B. Head and thorax in lateral and, C. Dorsal views. D. Mid femur.
FIGURE 43. Bolivaridora paraensis Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male holotype. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur. F–H. Terminalia in lateral, axial and ventral views respectively.
FIGURE 45. Bolivaridora paraensis Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Female paratype. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur. F–H. Terminalia in dorsal, lateral and ventral views respectively.
FIGURE 51. Bolivaridora cipolai Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male holotype. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur. F–H. Terminalia in lateral, dorsal and axial views respectively.
FIGURE 57. Bolivaridora parisae Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Female holotype. A. Frons.B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views, respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur. F–G. Terminalia in lateral and ventral views, respectively.
FIGURE 59. Habitus in lateral view of Mucrotettigina species. A. Cubanotettix turquinensis Perez-Gelabert, Hierro & Otte, 1998. B. Mucrotettix gibbosus Perez-Gelabert, Hierro & Otte, 1998. C. Mucrotettix spinifer Perez-Gelabert, Hierro & Otte, 1998.
FIGURE 67. Miriatra chalazombra Günther, 1939. Female. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views, respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Tegmina. F–H. Terminalia in axial, lateral and ventral views, respectively.
FIGURE 74. Grantiatra douglasi Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares gen. nov. et sp. nov. Male holotype. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur. F–G. Terminalia in lateral and axial views respectively.
FIGURE 77. Metopomystrum lilianae Cadena-Castañeda & Cardona, 2015. Male holotype. A–B. Habitus in lateral and dorsal views. C. Frons. D. Head and thorax in lateral view.
FIGURE 78. Metopomystrum pehlkei Günther, 1939. Male holotype. A–B. Habitus in lateral and dorsal views. C. Hind leg. D. Labels.
FIGURE 80. Metopomystrum ankeri Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male holotype. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur. F. Tegmina. G–H. Terminalia in lateral and ventral views respectively.
FIGURE 81. Metopomystrum ankeri Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Female paratypes. A–B. Habitus lateral and dorsal of female from Alejandría (Antioquia, Colombia). C–D. Habitus lateral and dorsal of female from San Luis (Antioquia, Colombia).
FIGURE 83. Metopomystrum amazoniensis Cadena-Castañeda & Cardona, 2015. Female holotype. A–B. Habitus in lateral and dorsal views. C. Frons. D. Hind femur.
FIGURE 85. Chiriquia mirifica Hebard, 1924. Male holotype. A–B. Habitus in lateral and C. Dorsal views. C. Frons. D. Labels. E. Frons outline (after Hebard, 1924).
FIGURE 86. Chiriquia serrata Morse, 1900. Male syntype. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Habitus in dorsal view. C. Frons. D. Labels. Photos: J. Tumbrinck.
FIGURE 87. Chiriquia serrata Morse, 1900. Female. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Habitus in dorsal view. C. Frons. D. Labels. Photos: J. Tumbrinck.
FIGURE 89. Chiriquia compressa Günther, 1939. Male syntype. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Habitus in dorsal view. C. Frons. D. Labels. Photos: J. Tumbrinck.
FIGURE 91. Trigonofemora fossulatus Hancock, 1906. Female. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Habitus in dorsal view. C. Frons. D. Labels. Photos: J. Tumbrinck.
FIGURE 96. Garciaitettix mirabilis Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male holotype habitus. A. Lateral views. B. Habitus in dorsal view.
FIGURE 97. Garciaitettix mirabilis Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male holotype. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur. F–G. Terminalia in lateral and axial views respectively.
FIGURE 102. Otumba dentata Hancock, 1907. Female. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Habitus in dorsal view. C. Frons. D. Labels. Photos: J. Tumbrinck.
FIGURE 104. Otumba scapularis Morse, 1900 (Scabrotettix biolleyi Bolívar, 1909 syn. nov.). Female type. A. Habitus in lateral and, B. Dorsal view. C. Frons.g J. Tumbrinck.
FIGURE 105. Otumba quadrata Hancock, 1907. Male lectotype. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Habitus in dorsal view. C. Frons. D. Labels. Photos: J. Tumbrinck.
FIGURE 108. Otumba dengi Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male holotype. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur. F–H. Terminalia in lateral, dorsal and ventral views respectively.
FIGURE 112. Otumba amazonica (Bolívar, 1887). Female paralectotype. A. Habitus in lateral and, B. Dorsal view. C. Frons. D. Labels. Photos: J. Tumbrinck.
FIGURE 120. Platythorus camurus Morse, 1900. Female holotype. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Habitus in dorsal view. C. Frons. D. Labels. Photos: J. Tumbrinck.
FIGURE 121. Amorphopus notabilis Serville, 1838. Female. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Frons. C. Head and thorax in lateral view. D. Habitus in dorsal view. E. Fore-femur. F. Mid-femur. G. Terminalia in ventral view and H. In lateral view. (Adapted from Cadena-Castañeda et al. 2020).
FIGURE 122. Amorphopus notabilis Serville, 1838. Male. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Frons. C. Head and thorax in lateral view. D. Habitus in dorsal view. E. Fore-femur. F. Mid-femur. G. Terminalia in ventral view and H. In lateral view. (Adapted from Cadena-Castañeda et al. 2020).
FIGURE 123. Eomorphopus antennatus (Bolívar, 1887). Female. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Frons. C. Head and thorax in lateral view. D. Habitus in dorsal view. E. Fore-femur. F. Mid-femur. G. Terminalia in ventral view and H. In lateral view. (Adapted from Cadena-Castañeda et al. 2020).
FIGURE 124. Eomorphopus antennatus (Bolívar, 1887). Male. A. Habitus in lateral view. B. Frons. C. Head and thorax in lateral view. D. Habitus in dorsal view. E. Fore-femur. F. Mid-femur. G. Terminalia in ventral view and H. In lateral view. (Adapted from Cadena-Castañeda et al. 2020).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |