Metopomystrum ankeri Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5597.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E8B87293-0CCD-469D-9F2F-17F1AB4919BF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14966614 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/542B87FD-FFD4-0461-9FDE-C7ECFE01F98F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2025-03-04 12:56:25, last updated 2025-03-04 13:25:28) |
scientific name |
Metopomystrum ankeri Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares |
status |
sp. nov. |
Metopomystrum ankeri Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares , sp. nov.
( Figs. 79–82 View FIGURE 79 View FIGURE 80 View FIGURE 81 View FIGURE 82 , Maps 1 and 2)
Type material. Holotype. Male. COLOMBIA, Caldas Department, Florencia , montane rainforest, 9.VIII.2019, A. Anker & F.A. García Oviedo leg. ( CAUD) . Paratypes. 1 Female. COLOMBIA, Antioquia, Alejandría. J. Cardona-Granda leg. 1 Female. COLOMBIA, Antioquia, San Luis, in forest. G. Morales leg. ( CAUD) . 1 Female. COLOMBIA, Antioquia, Cocorná , Vda. El Choco. FCA. ACA, 6°01'48.5"N 75°09'55.8"W. 1300 m. 10-Jul-2012. C. Niño. ( UNAB) GoogleMaps .
Description. Male. Medium-size (11 mm) and slender ( Fig. 79 View FIGURE 79 ). Coloration. Dark brown with spots and stripes in light brown, ocher, and white ( Fig. 79A View FIGURE 79 ). Frontal view of the head brown, with whitish and ocher sections ( Fig. 80A View FIGURE 80 ), and white spots also present throughout the body ( Figs. 79B View FIGURE 79 , 80B View FIGURE 80 ); dorsally, head light brown; eyes chocolate brown ( Fig. 80C View FIGURE 80 ); from the eyes, a post-ocular stripe extends laterally; antennae with the scape and pedicel ocher, segments 3 to 8 dark brownish with ocher-lined distal edges, segments 11 and 14 ocher at the basal half and dark at the distal half, while segments 12 and 13 the opposite ( Fig. 80B View FIGURE 80 ); clypeus light brown in the upper half with two dark brown spots at the center of the upper margin, and the lower half grayish; labrum dark brown with two large white spots on the upper half and, within each spot, a smaller brown spot adjoining the upper margin; palpi white with diffuse brown spots ( Fig. 80A View FIGURE 80 ). Pronotal disc brown with alternating diffuse black stripes; lateral lobes dark brownish black in the upper half and white in the lower half ( Figs. 79B View FIGURE 79 , 80C View FIGURE 80 ). Foreleg ocher with dark stripes ( Fig. 80D View FIGURE 80 ); mid femur brown, mid tibia with alternating rings of ocher and brown ( Fig. 80E View FIGURE 80 ); hind femur dark brown in the lower half and grayish brown in the upper half, with a white stripe descending perpendicularly from the upper margin at the midpoint of the femur length to the boundary between the lower and upper halves, then projecting parallelly to the genicular region ( Fig. 79A View FIGURE 79 ); hind tibia dark brown, with a small whitish stripe near the base, tarsomeres alternating between brown and white or ocher sections ( Fig. 79B View FIGURE 79 ). Tegmina and hindwings black with venation softly outlined in white ( Fig. 80F View FIGURE 80 ). Abdomen black covered with abundant tiny white spots. Head taller than wide, eyes occupying a third of the cephalic capsule; space between the eyes 0.8 times the width of an eye; scutellum narrow, not widened ( Fig. 80A View FIGURE 80 ); fascial carinae parallel, poorly protruding in lateral view and nearly straight ( Fig. 80B View FIGURE 80 ); lateral ocelli located near the fork of the frontal costa ( Fig. 80A View FIGURE 80 ). Antennal grooves situated at the level of the lower margins of the eyes; antennae with 14 segments. Fastigium of the vertex projecting forwards and forming a conical “horn” longer than the maximum length of an eye in lateral view ( Fig. 80B View FIGURE 80 ), dorsum of the “horn” ovoid and with a shallow depression, apex rounded ( Fig. 80C View FIGURE 80 ). Thorax. Anterior margin of the pronotum almost straight; prozonal carinae developed ( Fig. 80C View FIGURE 80 ), pronotal apex thin and truncate in dorsal view ( Fig. 79B View FIGURE 79 ). Median carina present but poorly subelevated; internal lateral carinae straight in lateral view; external lateral carinae finely denticulated and convergent ( Fig. 79B View FIGURE 79 ); infrascapular area thin and short, extending to level of first abdominal tergite ( Fig. 79A View FIGURE 79 ); lower margin of lateral lobes ovoid-shaped, and rounded; posterior margin of lateral lobe almost straight ( Fig. 80C View FIGURE 80 ). Wings. Tegmina lanceolate, with the anal margin tapering straight towards the apex, costal margin rounded and, as they converge, apex narrow and rounded ( Fig. 80F View FIGURE 80 ); hindwings exceeding the length of the abdomen and reaching the apex of the pronotum ( Fig. 79 View FIGURE 79 ). Legs. Fore and mid femora rectangular-shaped, dorsal and ventral margin little undulated, almost straight ( Figs. 80D, E View FIGURE 80 ); fore and mid tibiae slender and armed with small spines on distal half of the ventral margin; hind femur slender with the antegenicular and genicular teeth developed ( Fig. 79A View FIGURE 79 ); hind tibia armed dorsally with five inner and six outer small spines on each dorsal margin ( Fig. 79B View FIGURE 79 ). Abdomen unmodified. Tenth tergite divided dorsally, which connects to the epiproct; cerci conical, tapering towards the apex and moderately diverging towards the sides ( Fig. 80G View FIGURE 80 ); epiproct triangular and longer than wide. Penultimate sternite quadrangular, as long as the subgenital plate and little upcurved ( Fig. 80G View FIGURE 80 ); subgenital plate short, triangular, and apex with a U-shaped mid-notch ( Fig. 80H View FIGURE 80 ).
Female. Similar to the male, differing in ambisexual characters and with some coloration variations ( Fig. 81 View FIGURE 81 ): epiproct lanceolate with a rounded apex; valves of the ovipositor moderately thickened, covered with bristles; subgenital plate quadrangular, almost as wide as long, with a small medial extension on the posterior edge.
Measurements (in mm) male / females. CFP: 11 / 12–17. PL: 8.9 / 11–15. PLB: 2.5 / 3.0–3.5. FF: 1.6 / 2.0–2.5. FL: 1.7 / 1.8–2.4. MFL: 1.9 / 2.1–2.6. MTL: 1.7 / 2.0–2.5. HL: 4.7 / 5.5–5.9. HW: 1.4 / 1.5–2.0. HTL: 4.0 / 5.0–5.4.
Comparison. The new species differs from M. amazoniense , M. apterum , and M. muriciense because these species do not have well-developed wings, and the pronotum does not surpass the apex of the hind femur. Among the species with wings and a prolonged pronotum, M. ankeri sp. nov. is similar to M. pehlkei ; both species have the tegmina and dorsal margin of the pronotum unicolor, distinguishing them from M. lilianae . M. ankeri sp. nov. and M. pehlkei differ in the shape of the tegmina, which is lanceolate in the new species vs. ovoid, and the pronotum of M. pehlkei is more elongated than in the new species. Additionally, M. ankeri sp. nov. has a whitish stripe on the upper half of the hind femur ( Fig. 82 View FIGURE 82 ), which is absent in M. pehlkei .
Remarks. Two paratype females show variation in their measurements and coloration. The female from Alexandria ( Figs. 81A, B View FIGURE 81 ) has a coloration pattern more similar to the holotype male, and the pronotum’s apex moderately surpasses the hind femur’s apex. In contrast, the female from San Luis ( Figs. 81C, D View FIGURE 81 ) is larger, and her coloration tends to be reddish-brown, with the pronotum’s apex widely surpassing the hind femur’s apex. Both females have the characteristic whitish stripe of the hind femur.
Etymology. We dedicate this species to the biologist, wildlife photographer, and dear friend Dr. Arthur Anker, who collected this species.
FIGURE 79. Metopomystrum ankeri Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male holotype habitus. A. Lateral view and, B. Dorsal view.
FIGURE 80. Metopomystrum ankeri Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Male holotype. A. Frons. B–C. Head and thorax in lateral and dorsal views respectively. D. Fore femur. E. Mid femur. F. Tegmina. G–H. Terminalia in lateral and ventral views respectively.
FIGURE 81. Metopomystrum ankeri Cadena-Castañeda & Tavares sp. nov. Female paratypes. A–B. Habitus lateral and dorsal of female from Alejandría (Antioquia, Colombia). C–D. Habitus lateral and dorsal of female from San Luis (Antioquia, Colombia).
UNAB |
Universidad Nacional, Facultad de Agronomia |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |