Rafapicobia, Skoracki., 2011

Skoracki, Maciej, Sikora, Bozena & Spicer, Greg S., 2016, A review of the subfamily Picobiinae Johnston and Kethley, 1973 (Acariformes: Prostigmata: Syringophilidae), Zootaxa 4113 (1), pp. 1-95 : 93

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4113.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8B8CDC5A-304F-407F-A06F-F350F916DCD1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4624159

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/58448787-A544-3F68-8EF3-FF0DFA785DFC

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Rafapicobia
status

 

Key to species of the genus Rafapicobia View in CoL

(Females)

1. Setae ve situated distinctly posteromedial to setae vi .......... R. brotogeris Fain, Bochkov and Mironov, 2000 View in CoL comb. nov.

- Setae ve situated posterior or posterolateral to setae vi, both setae in close proximity............................... 2

2. Setae ag2 45–60 long................................................................................. 3

- Setae ag2 10–20 long................................................................................. 4

3. Each lateral branch of peritremes with 4–5 well visible chambers. Length ratios of setae vi: si and f1: f2 1:3 and 1:1.5 respectively. Genital plate absent.......................................................... R. zirnitra Skoracki, 2011 View in CoL

- Each lateral branch of peritremes with ill-visible chambers. Length ratios of setae vi: si and f1: f2 1:5–5.6 and 1:5 respectively. Genital plate present............................................. R. toxostoma Sikora, Fajfer and Skoracki, 2011 View in CoL

4. Two longitudinal agenital plates present.................................................................. 5

- Agenital plates absent................................................................................. 6

5. Agenital plates punctate. Two hysteronotal shields present. Length of setae h1 65–70................................................................................................. R. thamnophili Glowska and Schmidt, 2014 View in CoL

- Agenital plates apunctate. Hysteronotal shields absent. Length of setae h1 7–10.................................................................................................. R. lepidocolaptesi Skoracki and Solarczyk, 2012 View in CoL

6. Hysteronotal shields present............................................................................ 7

- Hysteronotal shields absent............................................................................ 8

7. Length ratios of setae f1: f2 and f1: h1 1:4.8–5.5 and 2:1................ R. dendrocolaptesi Skoracki and Solarczyk, 2012 View in CoL

- Length ratios of setae f1: f2 and f1: h1 1:1 and 1:2–3.5........................ R. milenskyi Glowska and Schmidt, 2014 View in CoL

8. Lenght ratios of setae f1: f2 and f1: h1 1:5 and 1:1 respectively. Coxal fields III and IV punctate............................................................................. R. melzeri Skoracki, Unsoeld, Skorupski and Kavetska, 2014 View in CoL

- Lenght ratios of setae f1: f2 and f1: h1 1:2.2–2.3 and 2:1 respectively. Coxal fields III and IV punctate....................................................................... R. ramphastos Fain, Bochkov and Mironov, 2000 View in CoL comb. nov.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF