Cyrtodactylus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.184270 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6233618 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/586B87D0-FFDA-B83A-FF43-FE4351A05CDC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyrtodactylus |
status |
|
Key to Australo-Papuan Cyrtodactylus
1 Subcaudals transversely enlarged, in a single row......................................................................................2
- Subcaudals not transversely enlarged........................................................................................................11
2 Precloacal/femoral pores>35, dark dorsal bands on body 4–7...................................................................3
- Precloacal/femoral pores <36, dark dorsal bands on body 8–11...............................................................10
3 Dark dorsal bands irregular in width, often divided....................................................................................4
- Dark dorsal bands of even width across dorsum, with even margins..........................................................5
4 28–29 rows of dorsal tubercles, 28–31 4 th toe lamellae, 6–7 dark dorsal bands or paired blotches ............. ........................................................................................................................................... C. salomonensis
- 20–24 rows of dorsal tubercles, 24–25 4 th toe lamellae, 4 dark dorsal bands............................... C. murua
5 Precloacal/femoral pores 36–46, 6–7 dark dorsal bands ..................................................... C. tuberculatus
- Precloacal/femoral pores 58–85, 4–5 dark dorsal bands ............................................................................ 6
6 Precloacal and femoral pore series separated from one another.............................................. C. tripartitus
- Precloacal and femoral pores in a continuous series...................................................................................7
7 Lateral tubercles 2– 3 x size of adjacent granules and ≈ size of scales of lateral skin fold..........................8
- Lateral tubercles 4– 7 x size of adjacent granules and> size of scales of lateral skin fold..........................9
8 Dorsal tubercles flat, smooth; dorsal bands not well margined in black and tan; posterior supralabials brown .................................................................................................................................. C. louisiadensis
- Dorsal tubercles conical, keeled; dorsal bands margined in black and tan; posterior supralabials white .... ................................................................................................................................................. C. epiroticus
9 20–23 rows of dorsal tubercles, 66–76 precloacal/femoral pores, dorsal ground color without dark spots. ....................................................................................................................................................... C. klugei
- 24–30 rows of dorsal tubercles, 75–85 precloacal/femoral pores, dorsal ground color with scattered dark spots ........................................................................................................................................... C. robustus
10 Upper arm with tubercles, light dorsal crossbands fading posteriorly .......................................... C. aaroni
- Upper arm without tubercles, light dorsal crossbands sharply distinct posteriorly................. C. mimikanus
11 No enlarged femoral scales, males without precloacal/femoral pores............................. C. sermowaiensis
- One or more rows of enlarged femoral scales, males with precloacal/femoral pores...............................12
12 Enlarged preanal scales compressed into a narrow chevron-shaped pit....................................................13
- Enlarged preanal scales arrayed in broad and shallow chevron................................................................14
13 Enlarged preanal scales widely separated from single row of enlarged femoral scales, 12–19 precloacal pores, no femoral pores............................................................................................................ C. papuensis
- Enlarged preanal scales continuous with several rows of enlarged femoral scales, 6–9 precloacal pores, 3– 14 femoral pores .................................................................................................................. C. marmoratus
14 Throat with scattered enlarged tubercles...................................................................................................15
- Throat without scattered enlarged tubercles..............................................................................................16
15 Mid-belly scale rows 51–59, males with 24–43 precloacal/femoral pores........................ C. novaeguineae
- Mid-belly scales rows 36–41, males with 7–16 precloacal pores..................................... C. irianjayaensis
16 Precloacal and femoral pore series separated from one another................................................................17
- Precloacal and femoral pores in a continuous series.................................................................................18
17 Femoral pores in two rows; dorsum light tan with 4–5 wide, transverse dark brown bands ... C. biordinis
- Femoral pores in single row; dorsum brown with 7–8 narrow, oblique, dark brown bands C. capreoloides
18 Dorsum dark brown with white tubercles................................................................................... C. derongo
- Dorsum light gray with 4–5 subdivided dark bands or pairs of blotches..................................................19
19 Tubercles of lateral skin fold dentate, 10–11 rows of dorsal tubercles....................................... C. serratus
- Tubercles of lateral skin fold conical but not dentate, 20–22 rows of dorsal tubercles................. C. loriae
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.