Eleganesia minuta (Yasumatsu, 1955) Liao & Terayama & Eguchi, 2022

Liao, Hauchuan, Terayama, Mamoru & Eguchi, Katsuyuki, 2022, Revision of Taiwanese and Ryukyuan species of Pristepyris Kieffer, 1905, with description of a new species (Hymenoptera, Bethylidae), ZooKeys 1102, pp. 1-42 : 1

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1102.84953

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2398E5CC-9413-4AE5-976B-DEF9F138A814

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5A3C338E-9BA7-5C1A-BDE1-6E935BC7927C

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Eleganesia minuta (Yasumatsu, 1955)
status

comb. nov.

Eleganesia minuta (Yasumatsu, 1955) comb. nov.

Figs 14 View Figure 14 , 15 View Figure 15 , 16 View Figure 16 , 17 View Figure 17 , 18 View Figure 18

Pristocera minuta Yasumatsu, 1955: 246. Holotype (male, KUF), type loc.: Sobosan, Prov. Bungo, Kyusyu, Japan. Acrepyris minutus : Terayama, 1996: 595 (genus transfer). Pristepyris minutus : Azevedo et al. 2018: 104 (genus transfer). Comb. nov.

Apenesia takasago Terayama, 1996: 143, figs 15-18. Holotype (male, NSMT), type loc.: Tokkasha, Nantou Hsien, Taiwan. Pristepyris takasago : Azevedo et al. 2018: 104 (genus transfer). Syn. nov.

Male diagnosis.

TL ≈ 3.3-5.5 mm. HL/HW × 100 = 98-109. Frons and vertex almost smooth and shining or with shallow foveolae, of which intervals are smooth and shining and wider than diameter of foveolae. Anterior clypeal margin nearly straight. Mandible with four apical teeth. Transverse pronotal carina absent. Cervical pronotal area in lateral view gently rounded. LP/WP = 1.30-1.44. Metapostnotal median carina distinct, but incompletely reaching posterior transverse margin. Tergum II without longitudinal ridge and sulcus, sternum II with longitudinal median carina. Hypopygium with almost straight apical margin. Aedeagus with developed ventral and dorsal valves; apical lobe reduced.

Female diagnosis.

TL = 3.7 mm. HL/HW × 100 = 139. Frons and vertex with foveolae (ca. 0.01 mm in diameter), of which intervals are imbricate; intervals in lateral part of frons as wide as or narrower than diameter of foveolae; intervals in vertex and median part of frons wider than diameter of foveolate. Median portion of clypeus roundly produced anteriad. Compound eye less developed. Mandible with four teeth. Transverse pronotal carina absent. Cervical pronotal area in lateral view gently rounded. Dorsal area of pronotum, mesoscutellum, mesopleuron and dorsomedian face of metapectal-propodeal complex imbricate. Dorsal area of pronotum, mesoscutellum, mesopleuron and dorsolateral face of metapectal-propodeal complex with spare foveolae. Tergum II without longitudinal ridge and sulcus.

Male description.

Full description was given by Yasumatsu (1955) and Terayama (2006). Additional information as below.

Head. HL/HW × 100 = 98-109 (100 in holotype of P. minuta ). Frons and vertex almost smooth and shining or with inconspicuous foveolae (ca. 0.01-0.02 mm in diameter, Fig. 15A View Figure 15 ) or shallow foveolae (ca. 0.02-0.04 mm, Fig. 15B View Figure 15 ), of which intervals are smooth and shining and wider than diameter of foveolae. Occipital carina present. Median portion of clypeus shortly produced anteriad; median clypeal carina moderately distinct, not reaching anterior margin; anterior clypeal margin nearly straight medially. Compound eye large and convex, with sparse thin erect setae. Mandible with four teeth.

Mesosoma. Pronotum without transverse pronotal carina; cervical pronotal area in lateral view round; dorsal area smooth and shining, or with sparse, inconspicuous or shallow foveolae. Mesopleuron elongate; anterior, upper and lower fovea distinct; acropleural area smooth and shining, with inconspicuous foveolae; mesopleural pit absent. Mesodiscrimen concave, without median carina. Metasternum with metafurcal pit. Lateral face of metapectal-propodeal complex obliquely rugose in marginal area and irregularly rugose in central area. Metapectal-propodeal complex in dorsal view with lateral margins subparallel and slightly convex; LP/WP = 1.30-1.44 (1.30 in holotype of P. minuta ); metapostnotal median carina distinct, but incompletely reaching posterior transverse margin; submedian rugae irregularly running; sublateral margin distinct, but short, incomplete posteriorly; posterior transverse margin distinct; dorsomedian face weakly rugoso-scabrous; dorsolateral face smooth and shining; median portion of propodeal declivity with transversely rugoso-scabrous. Forewing with long R12v vein and R2 flexion line, of which the latter is shorter than 1M2 flexion line (arrows in Fig. 15F View Figure 15 ), without 2M12 flexion line. Hindwing with four distal hamuli. Tarsal claws bifid, with thin and curved apical teeth; basal one very short.

Metasoma. Tergum II without longitudinal ridge and sulcus; sternum II with longitudinal median carina. Hypopygium with very long spiculum, with almost straight apical margin; apicomedian part thickened which is visible as a small triangular region; outer face of apicomedian part with relatively dense setae; membrane developed between spiculum and S9ala (Fig. 17A View Figure 17 ), without thickened margin. Gonostipes thin and glabrous, fused to harpe in dorsal portion. Harpe in ventral view elongate-spatulate, slightly curved inward, with blunt apex, entirely covered with setae which increase in length toward apex; median basal portion with concavity which accommodates digitus and cuspis. Subbasal part of volsella with seta-bearing area which is almost as long as cuspis. Cuspis elongate-lobate and straight, extending posteriad, with several long setae at the apex. Digitus extending laterad, curled. Aedeagus with reduced apical lobe; dorsal lobe large; ventral lobe elongated, with large lobate projection produced ventrally in posterior portion (arrow in Fig. 17D, F, H View Figure 17 ).

Female description.

Female of this species was recognized for the first time by collecting a male and female pair in copulation.

Color. Body light brown; mandible, antenna and legs as same as or lighter than body.

Head. Head capsule with posterior margin very weakly incurved, with posterolateral corner round; HL/HW × 100 = 139. Occipital carina present. Frons and vertex foveolate (ca. 0.01 mm in diameter), with intervals imbricate; intervals in lateral part of frons as wide as or narrower than diameter of foveolae; intervals in vertex and median part of frons as wide as or wider than diameter of foveolae. Clypeus imbricate; median portion roundly produced anteriad; median longitudinal carina reaching anterior clypeal margin which is slightly incurved medially (Fig. 18C View Figure 18 ). Compound eye less developed. Mandible with four teeth. Antennomere I (excluding the basal condylar bulb) 3.1 × as long as maximum width; antennomere I:II:III = 27:8:6 in length; antennomere II 0.9 × as long as maximum width, narrowed and bent in basal part; antennomere III-XII each 0.72-0.78 × as long as maximum width, elongate-cylindrical; antennomere XIII (terminal) 1.7 × as long as maximum width, with round apex.

Mesosoma. Pronotum with anterior flange extending anteriad beyond anterior margin of propleuron; cervical pronotal area in lateral view gently round; dorsal area subtrapezoidal, with weakly incurved posterior margin, with inconspicuous foveolae of which intervals are imbricate and wider than diameter of foveolae; transverse pronotal carina absent; LPD/WPD = 1.36. Mesoscutum overlain by posteromedian portion of pronotum. Mesoscutellum trapezoidal, 0.72 × as long as maximum width, weakly imbricate, with a few inconspicuous foveolae. Mesopleuron elongate and imbricate; anterior, upper and lower depressions absent; mesopleural pit absent. Lateral face of metapectal-propodeal complex imbricates entirely. Metapectal-propodeal complex in dorsal view weakly constricted behind propodeal spiracles and then widened again posteriad, without any distinct carinae which subdivide dorsal face; LP/WP = 2.16; dorsomedian face smooth and shining; median portion of propodeal declivity weakly transversely rugoso-scabrous.

Metasoma. Tergum II without longitudinal ridge and sulcus.

Material examined.

Japan: Tokyo. 4 males ( JT200820 View Materials _01, 05-07); Minami-osawa , 35°37'11"N, 139°12'03"E, 154 m alt. HauChuan Liao leg. (sweeping); 20/VIII/2020 GoogleMaps . 1 female, Miyake-jima ; Kentaro Tsujii leg.; 25/VIII-22/IX/2012 . Yakushima. 2 males ( JK210921 View Materials _05, 07); Ohko-no-taki, 30°17'48"N, 130°24'51"E, 16 m alt. HauChuan Liao leg. (sweeping); 22/IX/2021 GoogleMaps . Okinawa-Hontou. 1 male ( JO170808 View Materials _05); Mt. Nago , 26°35'58"N, 128°01'09"E, 181 m alt. HauChuan Liao leg. (sweeping); 10/VIII/2017 GoogleMaps . 2 males ( JO190717 View Materials _13, 15); Kunigami Vil. , 26°44'41"N, 128°13'10"E, 316 m alt. HauChuan Liao leg. (sweeping); 19/VII/2019 GoogleMaps . Amami-Oshima. 1 male ( JA170808 View Materials _13); Mt. Yuwan , 28°16'13"N, 129°19'26"E, 44 m alt. HauChuan Liao leg. (sweeping); 16/VIII/2017 GoogleMaps . Ishigaki - jima. 3 males ( JI170808 View Materials _28, 31, 35), Mt. Omoto , 24°26'31"N, 124°05'56"E, 93 m alt. HauChuan Liao leg. (sweeping); 12-13/VIII/2017 GoogleMaps . Iriomote - jima. 2 males (JIR190717_49, 54), Tropical Biosphere Research Center , 24°23'48"N, 123°48'11"E, 33 m alt. HauChuan Liao leg. (sweeping); 27-28/VII/2019 GoogleMaps . Taiwan: N. Taiwan. 3 males (TNT180629_03, 04, 09), Mt. ShiZaiTou, New Taipei City, 24°54'14"N, 121°29'46"E, 778 m alt. HauChuan Liao leg. (sweeping); 29/VI/2018 GoogleMaps . 5 males (TNT180706_01, 04, 06-08), Mt. Ta Tung , New Taipei City, 24°52'53"N, 121°34'07"E, 602 m alt. HauChuan Liao leg. (sweeping); 6/VII/2018 GoogleMaps . C. Taiwan. 2 males ( TN181022 View Materials _40, 47); Sun Moon Lake , Nantou County, 23°50'57"N, 120°56'16"E, 92 m alt. HauChuan Liao leg. (sweeping); 23/X/2018 GoogleMaps .

Taxonomic remarks.

Due to the new combination of " Pristepyris minutus " to the genus Elganesia , the "Key to Taiwanese and Ryukyuan species of the genus Eleganesia , based on male morphology" given in Liao et al. (2021) is updated and given as Appendix 1.

The holotype of " Pristepyris takasago " was unable to be discriminated morphologically from E. minuta (including the holotype). Therefore, the former is herein synonymised under the latter.

In the present phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ), E. minuta was subdivided into three (or four) lineages, i.e. Lineage “X” from the Kanto area of Japan to Okinawa-Hontou; “Y” from Ishigaki-jima to Taiwan and “Z” from Taiwan. The lineages also showed differences in the shape of the lobate extension of the ventral valve of aedeagus (Lineage X as in Fig. 17C, D; Y View Figure 17 as Fig. 17E, F; Z View Figure 17 as Fig. 17G, H View Figure 17 ). However, there was no remarkable difference among them in external morphology and hypopygium (excluding weak variation in head sculpture as seen in Figs 14A View Figure 14 , 15A, B View Figure 15 , 16A View Figure 16 ) and also no differences in the 28S sequence (Table 2 View Table 2 ). As the lineages were parapatric or allopatric in the area of Taiwan and the Ryukyus, in the present study, the Lineage X, Y and Z are conspecific and treated as E. minuta . However, it is also possible that further taxon sampling and integrative taxonomy may reveal several cryptic species within E. minuta and determine one of them as " E. takasago " (see also “Discussion”).

Distribution and habitat.

Hokkaido to Ryukyus in Japan ( Terayama 2006), northern South Korea ( Lim et al. 2011), northern and central Taiwan; evergreen broadleaf forest.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Bethylidae

Genus

Eleganesia

Loc

Eleganesia minuta (Yasumatsu, 1955)

Liao, Hauchuan, Terayama, Mamoru & Eguchi, Katsuyuki 2022
2022
Loc

Pristocera minuta

Liao & Terayama & Eguchi 2022
2022
Loc

Acrepyris minutus

Liao & Terayama & Eguchi 2022
2022
Loc

Pristepyris minutus

Liao & Terayama & Eguchi 2022
2022
Loc

Apenesia takasago

Liao & Terayama & Eguchi 2022
2022
Loc

Pristepyris takasago

Liao & Terayama & Eguchi 2022
2022