Labiobaetis tricolor (Tshernova, 1928)

Kluge, Nikita, Sivaruban, T., Srinivasan, Pandiarajan, Barathy, S. & Isack, Rajasekaran, 2023, Diagnosis, variability, distribution and systematic position of Labiobaetis pulchellus (Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985) (Ephemeroptera, Baetidae, Baetis s. l.), Zootaxa 5264 (1), pp. 94-108 : 95-96

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5264.1.6

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E136215E-461E-4DEE-AFA2-F4B818B27769

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7838147

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5C6687DE-5F1C-B758-0A8D-F9C46380FAB5

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Labiobaetis tricolor
status

 

Group tricolor View in CoL View at ENA

( Figs 1–60 View FIGURES 1–12 View FIGURES 13–16 View FIGURES 17–26 View FIGURES 27–36 View FIGURES 37–43 View FIGURES 44–55 View FIGURES 56–60 )

Group tricolor: Kluge 1997: 189 View in CoL .

Name of the group. Among species included in this group, Labiobaetis propinquus ( Walsh, 1863) View in CoL has a name older than Labiobaetis tricolor ( Tshernova, 1928) View in CoL . However, this group is not named « propinquus View in CoL group», but « tricolor View in CoL group» to avoid confusion with the « propinquus View in CoL group» proposed by Morihara & McCafferty (1979a; 1979b) for all Labiobaetis View in CoL .

Larval characters

Antenna: scape with distolateral process. The same in some other Labiobaetis , including the type species, L. atrebatinus . For the species lacking this process, a separate genus Cymulabaetis McCafferty & Waltz, 1995 was established, but at present it is not accepted ( Lugo-Ortiz & McCafferty 1997).

Labrum: setae forming submarginal arc are simple and sparse; the first two setae after the central seta are closely together ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 13–16 ). This character is known for L. tricolor (illustrated in Ikonomov 1962: fig. 13:1), L. propinquus (illustrated in Morihara & McCafferty 1979a: fig. 11; 1979b: fig. 30b), L. calcaratus ( Keffermüller, 1972) (personal observation by Kluge) and L. pulchellus (illustrated in Müller-Liebenau & Hubbard 1985: fig. 6a). The same in some other species groups, but in contrast to some other Labiobaetis (including the type species, L. atrebatinus ), which have the submarginal setal arc consisted of other kinds of setae (e.g. feathered, lanceolate, or spatulate), or consisted of simple setae, but without two setae brought together.

Hypopharynx: medial tuft of stout setae well developed and short ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17–26 ).

Maxillary palp: distal excavation of inner margin present ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17–26 ).

Labium: Paraglossae wide; labial palp with broad distomedial protuberance of 2nd segment and conical 3rd segment ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 13–16 ). The same in many other Labiobaetis .

Abdominal cuticular coloration: Varies individually from uniform color pattern on all abdominal terga I–IX ( Figs 10, 12 View FIGURES 1–12 ) to differentiated, with tergum V having largest unpaired median blank ( Figs 4, 7, 11 View FIGURES 1–12 ). This individual variation is known for L. pulchellus (see below) and for L. tricolor : uniform coloration of L. tricolor is illustrated by Ikonomov (1962: fig. 12), contrasting coloration with largest median blank on the 5th tergum is illustrated by Müller-Liebenau (1969: Abb. 113).

Imaginal characters

Gonostyli: 1st segment parallel-sided, with prominent rectangular apical-inner angle; 2nd segment narrow in proximal part and wider in distal part; 3rd segment short and roundish, sharply separated ( Figs 56–60 View FIGURES 56–60 ). Probably, such shape of gonostyli occurs in this group only.

Penial bridge: Projected caudally forming a pair of rounded lobes with deep concavity between them, with sharply pointed, sclerotized denticle arising from middle of this concavity ( Figs 56, 57, 60 View FIGURES 56–60 ). The same structure of the penial bridge occurs in L. atrebatinus and L. frondalis ( McDunnough, 1925) (both these species differ from the tricolor group by non-angulate 1st gonostylus segment and by widened setae of the submarginal arc on the larval labrum).

Hind wing: The described species of the tricolor group have narrow hind wings with two longitudinal veins, either lacking costal projection (in L. tricolor , L. propinquus and L. pulchellus – Figs 20, 22, 24, 26 View FIGURES 17–26 ), or with a small costal projection (in L. calcaratus ). One of us (Kluge) has reared material of an un-described species from Sulawesi, which belongs to the tricolor group and completely lacks hind wings.

Distribution. Holarctic and Oriental Region.

Species composition. Following species are known as larvae and imagines reliably associated by rearing: Palaearctic Labiobaetis tricolor, Nearctic L. propinquus, Palaearctic L. calcaratus and Oriental L. pulchellus . Some other Oriental species belonging to this group are described either only as imagines, or only as larvae. Particularly, Labiobaetis ulmeri ( Müller-Liebenau, 1981) known as male imago from Sumatra has the structure of gonostyli and penial bridge characteristic for the tricolor group.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Ephemeroptera

Family

Baetidae

Genus

Labiobaetis

Loc

Labiobaetis tricolor

Kluge, Nikita, Sivaruban, T., Srinivasan, Pandiarajan, Barathy, S. & Isack, Rajasekaran 2023
2023
Loc

tricolor:

Kluge, N. J. 1997: 189
1997
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF