Borneopsis cryptosticta (Hebard, 1922) Jin & Liu & Wang, 2020

Jin, Xingbao, Liu, Xianwei & Wang, Hanqiang, 2020, New taxa of the tribe Meconematini from South-Pacific and Indo-Malayan Regions (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Meconematinae), Zootaxa 4772 (1), pp. 1-53 : 40-42

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4772.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F0641A6C-D049-4CD1-BEA5-5E09F3B01923

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3815392

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5D0E2915-FF9B-C343-FF70-3CA3B013D4F8

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Borneopsis cryptosticta
status

 

59) Borneopsis cryptosticta View in CoL ( Hebard, 1922, Xizicus ) comb. n. new male

1♂ (hind legs lost): SINGAPORE: Nee Sung / Forest Reserve / 20m, XII-7-1958; T . C. Maa / Collector/ BISHOP

Description of male. General appearance typical of the genus. Body moderate size. Fastigium of vertex sharp conical. Pronotum with deep lateral plate, posterior margin sinuate, humeral sinus indistinct. Tegmina and wings long, beyond apex of hind femora. Genicular lobe of hind femur with short spinules apex. Hind tibia with 3 pairs of apical spurs.

Male 10 th tergite without posteriomedian notch, a pair of short process laterally compressed parallel to each oth- er on posteriomedian margin ( Fig. 26a View FIGURE 26 ). Cerci basal half swollen, apical half flatten with narrowing apex, strongly bent inward and upward ( Fig. 26a, b View FIGURE 26 ). Subgenital plate with nearly even posterior margin, styli moderate long ( Fig. 26c View FIGURE 26 ).

Measurements (mm). Body: ♂ 11.5; Pronotum: ♂ 4.0; Tegmina: ♂ 17.6; Hind femora: lost.

Comments and comparison. This male collected from Singapore was identified as Xiphidiopsis cryptosticta Hebard, 1922 by second author years ago before Borneopsis Gorochov, 2016 established, mainly based on its genicular lobe of hind femur with spinules apex but with suspicions, as Sänger & Helfert (1996) described a male from Thailand as Xiphidiopsis cryptosticta Hebard, 1922 already. By carefully reading their description (1996: 610): “Femora unarmed”, that seems to be disagreed with what Hebard’s original description (1922: 256) of female from Singapore: “Genicular lobes of cephalic and median femora bluntly rounded, of caudal femora unispinose”. Probably Hebard compaired with some taxa of Conocephalinae with doubled spinular genicular lobes, as Xiphidiopsis once shifted from Conocephalinae to Listroscelinae . Surely, this designation may still need to be confirmed when new material with both sexes from Singapore available.

T

Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Orthoptera

Family

Tettigoniidae

Genus

Borneopsis

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF