Cypselurus sp.

Shakhovskoy, Ilia B. & Parin, Nikolay V., 2022, A review of the flying fish genus Cypselurus (Beloniformes: Exocoetidae). Part 2. Revision of the subgenus Poecilocypselurus Bruun, 1935 with descriptions of three new species and five new subspecies and reinstatement of Exocoetus apus Valenciennes and E. neglectus Bleeker, Zootaxa 5117 (1), pp. 1-109 : 94-99

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5117.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CFA7895B-43A7-4E19-8623-E8EAE4C43A89

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6823250

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5F4D771C-0958-FFF4-E1C8-FF0693DAFDB4

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Cypselurus sp.
status

 

Cypselurus sp. ( poecilopterus ?)

Juveniles described below were previously identified as C. oligolepis . However, we reidentified them as probable juveniles of C. poecilopterus , having darker pigmentation of pectoral and pelvic fins with obscure (or even indiscernible) spots. One juvenile had one pectoral fin spotted and the opposite fin entirely dark. However, meristic and morphometric characters of these juveniles agree well with those of C. poecilopterus (see description of this species in Shakhovskoy & Parin 2010).

Synonymy and bibliography.

Cypselurus nigripennis (non Valenciennes).? Fowler, 1928: 84–85 (description of a juvenile; Shortland I. (Solomon Is.)).

Cypselurus oligolepis View in CoL (non Bleeker).? Fedoryako 1982: 111 (juveniles listed as associated with drifting objects; Indian Ocean; in part: only fish from Station 4936).

Material examined. Forty-four specimens 23–77.5 mm SL.

Full morphological study. IORAS 04053 (7, 31– 53.5 mm SL), 13°37’N 86°53’E, 2- 3.02.1961 GoogleMaps . IORAS 04054 (24, 35– 68.5 mm SL), 13°37’N 86°53’E, 2- 3.02.1961 GoogleMaps . IORAS 04055 (1, 52.5 mm SL), 9°S 133°E, 18.07.1967 GoogleMaps . IORAS 04056 (1, 77.5 mm SL), 8°18’N 120°25’E, 26.06.1971 GoogleMaps . IORAS 04057 (1, 48 mm SL), 24°34’S 108°20’E, 27.07.1962 GoogleMaps . IORAS 04058 (1, 64.5 mm SL), 8°18’N 120°25’E, 26.06.1971 GoogleMaps . IORAS 04059 (1, 54.5 mm SL), ~ 3°47’S 144°45’E, 7.04.1966 GoogleMaps . CAS 81855 (3, 50.5–58 mm SL), Apo Reef , South China Sea, 7.12.1949 .

Partial morphological study. IORAS 04053 (1, 28.5 mm SL), 13°37’N 86°53’E, 2- 3.02.1961 GoogleMaps . IORAS 04060 (2, 41– 47 mm SL), 10°48’S 104°38’E, 2.03.1973 GoogleMaps . IORAS 04061 (2, 23– 23.5 mm SL), 8°10’S 104°39’E, 22- 23.03.1961 GoogleMaps .

Description. Meristic and morphometric characters are given in Tables 1–6 View TABLE 1 and 10. D View TABLE 10 11–13, A 7–9 (usually 8), P I 14–16 (usually I 15), Spred 24–27 (usually 25–26), Str 8½–10 (usually 8½), Sp.br 21–26 (6–8 + 15–18), usually 22–25 (6–7 + 16–17), Vert 39–41 (24–26 + 14–17), usually 40–41 (26 + 14–15). Snout very short ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ), lower jaw shorter than upper or of equal size; teeth small (not visible with the naked eye), conical (only largest specimen 77.5 mm SL has some teeth with additional cusps), arranged in 1–2 (very rarely three) rows. Palatine teeth always present, usually few in number.

Body deep and wide ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ). Greatest body depth 3.95–5.0 in SL. Body width 1.01–1.24 and caudal peduncle depth 2.08–2.51 in greatest body depth. Head rather large and very deep ( Fig. 38a View FIGURE 38 ), greatest head depth and head length 4.15–5.0 and 3.75–4.35 in SL, respectively. Head length 1.02–1.30 in dorso-caudal distance. Eyes large, eye diameter 7.45–10.9 in SL, 1.95-2.70 in head length, 1.0– 1.4 in interorbital width and 0.85–1.25 in postorbital distance; eye diameter decreasing strongly with growth.

Pectoral fins long, 1.4–1.65 in SL; their length increasing strongly with growth ( Fig. 38c View FIGURE 38 ). Tip of pectoral fin reaching from middle to end of dorsal-fin base (rarely slightly beyond). First pectoral-fin ray unbranched, its length 2.35–2.9 in SL and 1.57–1.87 in lP. Pelvic-fin base closer to posterior edge of head than to origin of caudal-fin lower lobe (cV / pV = 0.69–0.88). Pelvic fin length 2.2–2.65 in SL and 1.44–1.69 in lP. Tip of pelvic fin reaching (nearly reaching) origin of caudal-fin lower lobe or slightly beyond.

Anal-fin origin far behind dorsal-fin origin, 1st anal-fin ray beneath 5 th –7 th dorsal-fin ray. Dorsal fin with 3–5 rays more than anal fin. Dorsal and anal fins very high, HD 5.15–6.35 and HA 7.55–10.4 in SL; height of both fins decreasing strongly with growth ( Fig. 38d–e View FIGURE 38 ). Longest ray in dorsal fin—4 th –8 th (occasionally 2 nd or 3 rd), in anal fin—2 nd or 3 rd. Tip of last dorsal-fin ray protruding well beyond origin of caudal-fin upper lobe (only in the largest fish 77.5 mm SL slightly not reaching it). Middle and posterior dorsal-fin rays elongated, tip of penultimate ray (rays) protruding beyond tip of last ray (occasionally at the same level or slightly ahead).

Pigmentation. Body pale brown to dark brown ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ), ventral side usually darker than dorsal one. Body bands usually absent, but some juveniles with 1–4 dark bands: above bases of pectoral and pelvic fins, between them, above anus and (or) above posterior part of anal-fin base. Lower surface of head brown to dark brown, usually with paler chin, “lips” and distal parts of branchiostegal rays; in a few fish pale with aggregations of melanophores under eyes (on bases of branchiostegal rays) and on chin.

Pectoral fin pigmentation highly variable ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 ): brown to dark brown usually with a transverse row of 2–11 large pale spots proximally (occasionally absent), pale fin tip and two small pale areas near tips of 2 nd and 3 rd rays; distal part of pectoral fin usually with rows of darker and paler spots, which in some fish quite evident ( Fig. 39a–b View FIGURE 39 ), in others visible only under back lighting ( Fig. 39d–f View FIGURE 39 ) and in still others (fish with darkest pigmentation) not visible at all ( Fig. 39c View FIGURE 39 ).

Like pectoral fins, pelvic fins pigmentation also variable: from entirely brown or dark brown ( Fig. 40a View FIGURE 40 ), sometimes with a row of faint pale spots basally, to vaguely spotted ( Fig. 40e–f View FIGURE 40 ) and obviously spotted ( Fig. 40b–d View FIGURE 40 ).

Dorsal fin more or less uniformly pigmented, dark gray to dark brown. Anal fin in juveniles 23–35 mm SL entirely brown to dark brown posteriorly and pale with pigmentation only along the fin base anteriorly. In juveniles 35–77.5 mm SL, anal fin brown to dark brown (sometimes paler basally) with pale anterior corner (between 2–4 anterior rays distally).

Caudal fin ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ) pale with pale brown to dark brown base, dense brown melanophores along lower lobe rays (except uppermost rays) and sparse ones on upper lobe (occasionally absent). In fish 60–77.5 mm SL, caudal fin usually with 1–2 dark bands on lower lobe ( Fig. 37f View FIGURE 37 ) and, sometimes, also with one band on upper lobe distally.

Coloration in life. No data.

Intraspecific variation. The juveniles may be sorted into three morphs: a pale morph (paired fins paler and distinctly spotted), a dark morph (paired fins uniformly dark and not spotted, but pectoral fins sometimes, like in C. oligolepis , with a transverse row of paler spots proximally), and an intermediate morph (paired fins dark, but vague spottiness discernible if fins viewed against the light). An intermediate morph juvenile has one pectoral fin spotted and the opposite fin entirely dark. The pale morph is clearly identifiable as C. poecilopterus . The dark morph is very similar to C. oligolepis and C. neglectus and may be misidentified as one of these species. But the intermediate morph, binding these two morph into a whole, suggests that all three morphs belong to a single species— C. poecilopterus . The variation in pigmentation intensity may be a result of intraspecific polymorphism or different physiological conditions of fish at the time of capture and fixation. This matter needs further research.

Comparative remarks. The juveniles of this species, and especially the dark morph, may be confused with juveniles of C. oligolepis and C. neglectus . However, they differ in higher dorsal and anal fins (HD> 15.5 vs. usually <15.5% SL, HA usually> 10.5 vs. usually <10.5% SL, see Fig. 38d–e View FIGURE 38 ), deeper and wider body and head (H and HC> 20 vs. usually <20% SL, h> 8.5 vs. usually <8.5% SL ( Fig. 38a–b View FIGURE 38 ), p usually> 18 vs. usually <18% SL, io usually> 12.5 vs. usually <12.5% SL), larger eyes and shorter snout (ao usually <3 vs. usually> 3, index o/ao usually> 3.5 vs. usually <3.5, see Fig. 38f View FIGURE 38 ), longer pectoral fins (lP usually> 62 vs. usually <62% SL (see Fig. 38c View FIGURE 38 ), lP 1 usually> 35 vs. usually <35% SL, index lP/lV usually> 1.5 vs. usually <1.5). Also, they differ from C. oligolepis and C. neglectus neglectus in elongated middle and posterior dorsal-fin rays (penultimate ray tip reaching further back than last ray tip).

Distribution. The juveniles described above were collected in the Bay of Bengal, off Christmas Island (Indian Ocean), off western Australia, in the Arafura Sea, off Cape York, in the Sulu Sea and near Apo Reef; thus, within the range of C. poecilopterus (see Shakhovskoy 2018).

CAS

California Academy of Sciences

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Actinopterygii

Order

Beloniformes

Family

Exocoetidae

Genus

Cypselurus

Loc

Cypselurus sp.

Shakhovskoy, Ilia B. & Parin, Nikolay V. 2022
2022
Loc

Cypselurus oligolepis

Fedoryako, B. I. 1982: 111
1982
Loc

Cypselurus nigripennis

Fowler, H. W. 1928: 84
1928
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF