Retaldar, Zhao, Songping, Bourgoin, Thierry & Wang, Menglin, 2019

Zhao, Songping, Bourgoin, Thierry & Wang, Menglin, 2019, The impact of a new genus on the molecular phylogeny of Hemisphaeriini (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Issidae), ZooKeys 880, pp. 61-74 : 63-65

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:047EBF6E-8BFB-4E03-8BD1-E72989E06390

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9A9AD297-9A97-44C2-B710-B1B34A0D1817

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:9A9AD297-9A97-44C2-B710-B1B34A0D1817

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Retaldar
status

gen. nov.

Retaldar gen. nov.

Type species.

Retaldar yanitubus sp. nov., here designated.

Etymology.

Genus name masculine from the free combination of the latin word ' rete ' meaning network as for the reticulated forewings and the suffix '- aldar ' from the genus Euxaldar Fennah, 1978.

Diagnosis.

This new genus is similar to the genus Clypeosmilus Gnezdilov & Soulier-Perkins, 2017 in general appearance, but differs by: 1) a more complex and obscure reticular venation of the forewing ( Fig. 1 View Figures 1–5 ) while a simpler pattern is found in Clypeosmilus ( Gnezdilov and Soulier-Perkins 2017, fig. 1A); 2) an asymmetrical male genitalia with the periandrium more developed on right side and the aedeagus processes emerging at different levels, more posteriorly on right side ( Figs 9 View Figures 6–11 , 10 View Figures 6–11 ) while it is symmetrical in Clypeosmilus ( Gnezdilov and Soulier-Perkins 2017, fig. 3A); 3) gonostyli with ventral margin deeply convex ( Fig. 8 View Figures 6–11 ), while it is much more elongated in Clypeosmilus ( Gnezdilov and Soulier-Perkins 2017, fig. 3C). The new genus is also similar to the genus Eusudasina Yang, 1994, from which it differs also by its more complex reticulate venation and by its longer frons, around 1.2 times longer (in middle) than broad at widest part ( Figs 3 View Figures 1–5 , 21 View Figures 19–21 ), only around 0.9 times longer in Eusudasina ( Chan and Yang 1994, fig. 34C). With Euxaldar Fennah, 1978, Retaldar gen. nov. shares the general form of the gonostyli, which is strongly developed ventrally ( Fennah 1978, fig. 251; Gnezdilov et al. 2017, fig. 8) but definitively differs by its distal postero-ventral protuberance ( Fig. 8 View Figures 6–11 ) and by its near-symmetric subapical processes on the periandrium ( Figs 9 View Figures 6–11 , 10 View Figures 6–11 ) while they are asymmetrical in the former ( Gnezdilov et al. 2017, figs 1, 2).

Description.

Head with compound eyes slightly wider than pronotum, almost same width as mesonotum ( Fig. 1 View Figures 1–5 ). Vertex rectangular, obviously broader than long at midline, anterior margin almost straight, lateral margins nearly parallel, posterior margin slightly roundly concave at middle; median carina absent on disc ( Fig. 1 View Figures 1–5 ). Frons obviously longer than wide, gradually broadening from dorsal margin to below the level of antennae, then curved to frontoclypeal suture ( Figs 3 View Figures 1–5 , 21 View Figures 19–21 ); dorsal margin slightly concave, lateral margins slightly broaden below level of compound eyes, median carina nearly invisible. Frons with numerous tiny tubercles on the whole disc. The tubercles larger on the lateral areas, arranged into a vertical line on each side of frons ( Figs 3 View Figures 1–5 , 21 View Figures 19–21 ). Frontoclypeal suture straight ( Figs 3 View Figures 1–5 , 21 View Figures 19–21 ). Gena in lateral view flattened and oblique ( Fig. 2 View Figures 1–5 ). Clypeus in lateral view with a protuberance below frontoclypeal suture slightly surpassing the gena ( Fig. 2 View Figures 1–5 ); in ventral view, clypeus without median carina ( Figs 3 View Figures 1–5 , 21 View Figures 19–21 ). Rostrum reaching midcoxae; apical segment slightly shorter than subapical one. Antennae with scape extremely short, pedicel rounded ( Figs 3 View Figures 1–5 , 21 View Figures 19–21 ). Pronotum triangular, apical margin roundly convex, posterior margin nearly straight, with some faint small nodules on each side or nodules invisible, median carina absent ( Figs 1 View Figures 1–5 , 19 View Figures 19–21 , 20 View Figures 19–21 ). Mesonotum triangular, a little longer than pronotum in midline, without carina on the disc; with ( Fig. 1 View Figures 1–5 ) or without ( Figs 19 View Figures 19–21 , 20 View Figures 19–21 ) some faint small nodules in lateral part apically. Forewings obviously longer than broad, without hypocostal plate, with elevated irregular reticular venations and venation poorly recognizable, costal margin and posterior margin subparallel, costal margin roundly convex, apical margin straight and oblique inward to posterior margin ( Fig. 4 View Figures 1–5 ), CuP obvious, Pcu and A1 fused exceeding middle of clavus ( Figs 1 View Figures 1–5 , 4 View Figures 1–5 ). Hindwing one-lobed. Metatibia with two lateral spines on apical half and seven spines apically.

Male genitalia.

Anal tube in lateral view long and curved ( Fig. 6 View Figures 6–11 ). Pygofer long triangular in lateral view, posterior margin roundly convex ( Fig. 6 View Figures 6–11 ). Gonostyli irregularly quadrangular in profile, almost as high as long, dorsal margin nearly straight, ventral margin strongly convex with a strong posteroapical protuberance, caudo-ventral angle rounded ( Figs 6 View Figures 6–11 , 8 View Figures 6–11 ). Capitulum of gonostyli finger-shaped, with a small peaked spine ( Fig. 8 View Figures 6–11 ). Periandrium tubular, subapical nearly symmetric, medially constricted and slightly asymmetric in ventral view. Aedeagus processes asymmetric, right one emerging more posteriorly than left one ( Figs 9 View Figures 6–11 , 10 View Figures 6–11 ). Aedeagus a little longer than dorsolateral lobe and ventral lobe of periandrium ( Figs 9 View Figures 6–11 , 10 View Figures 6–11 ).

Female genitalia.

Anal tube in dorsal view a little longer than wide ( Fig. 12 View Figures 12–18 ). Gonoplacs nearly rectangular in lateral view, apical margin rounded ( Fig. 13 View Figures 12–18 ), in dorsal view fused at middle near base, broadest near base, outer lateral margins straight and roundly convex at base ( Fig. 14 View Figures 12–18 ). Gonapophysis IX in lateral view long and narrow, boat-shaped ( Fig. 16 View Figures 12–18 ); in dorsal view nearly triangular, basal half broader than apical half, with a spine on each side ( Fig. 15 View Figures 12–18 ); gonospiculum bridge developed ( Fig. 16 View Figures 12–18 ). Gonocoxa VIII long rectangular ( Fig. 18 View Figures 12–18 ). Three teeth at apex and three keeled teeth on outer lateral margin of anterior connective lamina of gonapophysis VIII ( Fig. 18 View Figures 12–18 ). Endogonocoxal process membranous ( Fig. 18 View Figures 12–18 ).

Distribution.

China (Guangxi).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Issidae