Hylomus Cook & Loomis, 1924

Srisonchai, Ruttapon, Enghoff, Henrik, Likhitrakarn, Natdanai & Panha, Somsak, 2018, A revision of dragon millipedes I: genus Desmoxytes Chamberlin, 1923, with the description of eight new species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae), ZooKeys 761, pp. 1-177: 1

publication ID

http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.761.24214

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:91658359-00AE-4319-ACBC-E9C544599C5B

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/60540CFB-E2AC-815F-F815-8FB55D3766C4

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Hylomus Cook & Loomis, 1924
status

stat. rev.

Genus Hylomus Cook & Loomis, 1924  stat. rev.

Hylomus  Cook & Loomis, 1924: 105

Notes.

Hylomus  was established as a monotypic genus by Cook and Loomis (1924), who were so impressed by the remarkable external features of the type species, H. draco  Cook & Loomis, 1924, viz., the strongly elevated paraterga (like trees), that they placed the new species not only in a new genus but even in a new family, Hylomidae  .

Jeekel (1964, 1968) maintained Hylomus  as a valid genus, including only H. draco  , and moved it into family Paradoxosomatidae  , stating that the genus Pratinus  Attems, 1937 (= Desmoxytes  ) was closely related to Hylomus  .

Later, Jeekel (1980a) re-assessed the generic allocation of all members of Hylomus  , Desmoxytes  Chamberlin, 1923, Pratinus  Attems, 1937, Prionopeltis  Pocock, 1895 and Ceylonesmus  Chamberlin, 1941, leading to the recognition of three genera: Hylomus  , Desmoxytes  (= Prionopeltis  , Pratinus  , Ceylonesmus  ) and Pteroxytes  Jeekel, 1980. Jeekel (1980a) stated that the morphological characters of Hylomus  showed clear differences from Desmoxytes  and Pteroxytes  (paranota antler-shaped and detail of gonopodal apex). The same author emphasised that his work was just a preliminary outline, and that "the discovery of new species … may considerably change the picture".

Golovatch and Enghoff (1994) disagreed with Jeekel’s idea (1980a) to maintain Hylomus  and Pteroxytes  as separate genera. Based on new evidence from examination of old and new material, previous literature and the first cladistic analysis based on morphology, the authors synonymised Hylomus  and Pteroxytes  under Desmoxytes  and assigned the genus to tribe Orthomorphini  , of which they regarded Hylomini  a synonym.

As mentioned above, our morphological analysis, as well as the initial molecular study, support recognition of Hylomus  as a valid genus in agreement with Jeekel (1980a). We therefore consider Hylomus  as a valid genus, separate from Desmoxytes  . We further reallocate 33 species of Desmoxytes  s.l. from China (19 species), Vietnam (ten species), Laos (three species) and Thailand (one species) to Hylomus  (see Table 2).