PHOCINAE, Gray, 1821

Koretsky, I. A., Rahmat, S. J. & Peters, N., 2014, Remarks On Correlations And Implications Of The Mandibular Structure And Diet In Some Seals (Mammalia, Phocidae), Vestnik Zoologii 48 (3), pp. 255-268 : 264

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.2478/vzoo-2014-0029

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6177FD75-FFC7-FFE7-E8A5-3595CBE29D46

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

PHOCINAE
status

 

Subfamily PHOCINAE

The members of this subfamily also have well-developed muscles of mastication(similar to the subfamily Cystophorinae ), but without sexual dimorphism and with much smaller overall sizes. They have smaller teeth, a small mandibular ramus, a condyloid process that is superior to the tooth-row (but not as high as in Cystophorinae ) and a condyloid angle that lies between Cystophorinae and Monachinae , suggesting that Phocinae diets consist of mostly medium-sized prey (larger than monachine and smaller than cystophorine prey). Therefore, the subfamily Phocinae is located in an intermediate position among the three extant subfamilies.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Carnivora

Family

Phocidae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF