Adelosgryllus xambioa, Merlo & Castro-Souza & Junta & Ferreira, 2022

Merlo, Rayanne Lays Sant’Ana, Castro-Souza, Rodrigo Antônio, Junta, Vitor Gabriel Pereira & Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes, 2022, Expanding the taxonomic knowledge of Adelosgryllus Mesa & Zefa, 2004 (Orthoptera: Grylloidea: Phalangopsidae): description of four new species for Brazilian subterranean habitats, Zootaxa 5133 (1), pp. 83-109 : 90-93

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5133.1.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:31F5A638-2922-41DC-BEA4-0988B49BE6C4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6522833

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/635AA513-9512-AD41-FF17-F951FAA7FD5A

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Adelosgryllus xambioa
status

sp. nov.

Adelosgryllus xambioa View in CoL n. sp.

( Figures 25–29 View FIGURES 25–29 , 30–37 View FIGURES 30–37 , 38–40 View FIGURES 38–40 , 41–42 View FIGURES 41–42 , 43–45 View FIGURES 43–45 , Table 1 View TABLE 1 )

Material examined. Holotype ♂, code ISLA 66153, Brazil , Tocantins state, Xambioá municipality, Explosão cave (6º 25’ 19.301” S; 48º 24’ 34.880” w), 22.ii.2018, Ferreira R.L. leg GoogleMaps . Holotype condition: right tegmen and legs detached, and maintained in holotype tube.

Distribution. Known only to Explosão cave (6º 25’ 19.301” S; 48º 24’ 34.880” W) municipality of Xambioá, Tocantins state, Brazil.

Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the municipality of Xambioá, Tocantins state, where the species was found.

Diagnosis. Combination of the following characteristics: superior inner base of paramere 1 more rounded (Ps.P1, Figs 26 and 28 View FIGURES 25–29 ) (compared to A. lucifugus and A. ferratilis n. sp.), inner basal margin from paramere 1 with dilatation more pronounced (ventral, diagonal and front view) (Ps.P1.p, Figs 25, 28 and 29 View FIGURES 25–29 ) (compared to A. lucifugus and A. ferratilis n. sp.); paramere 2 slightly dilated toward paramere 1 (dorsal view) (Ps.P2, Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–29 ); rami elongated and poorly sclerotized (R, Figs 25, 27 and 29 View FIGURES 25–29 ); ectophallic fold poorly sclerotized, lateral border slightly towards outside (Ec.F, Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–29 ); endophallic sclerite underdeveloped (End.Sc, Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–29 ).

Description, male holotype. Similar to A. ferratilis n. sp. with the following differences: body dark brown with head orange (in vivo) ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 43–45 ) (body pale dark brown and head pale yellow after fixation in ethanol 70%) ( Figs 30–37 View FIGURES 30–37 ); compound eyes were depigmented due to ethanol fixation (comparation between figs 30 and 45, same individual); pronotum pale dark brown, poorly marked with a whitish vertical and without horizontal median band, two small symmetrical diagonal white spots near the distal portion ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 30–37 ); Right tegmen: less sclerotized, covering the first five abdominal tergites ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 30–37 ). Lateral field (in lateral view, Figs 33 View FIGURES 30–37 and 42 View FIGURES 41–42 ): diagonal vein (DV), subcostal (SC) and radial (R) with poorly marked irregular veins. Field (in ventral view, Fig. 41 View FIGURES 41–42 ): harp with a median-longitudinal vein (L) more toward out, and four crossed veins (Hcv), the first forms a small cell, below curbital 2 (Cu2); mirror with a narrower proximal part of triangular shape, with two crossed veins (Mcv), unbranched; subgenital and supra-anal plates dark brown, shapes changed after fixation in ethanol ( Figs 35–37 View FIGURES 30–37 ); stridulatory file with 94 teeth.

Observations in holotype phallic sclerites: Similar to A. ferratilis n. sp. with the following differences: phallic complex less sclerotized ( Figs 25–29 View FIGURES 25–29 ). Pseudepiphallic: superior inner base of paramere 1 more rounded (ventral view) (Ps.P1, Fig 26 View FIGURES 25–29 ), inner basal margin from paramere 1 with a dilatation more pronounced (ventral, diagonal and front view) (Ps.P1.p, Figs 25, 28 and 29 View FIGURES 25–29 ); paramere 2 slightly dilated toward paramere 1 (dorsal view) (Ps.P2, Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–29 ); rami poorly sclerotized (R, Figs 25, 27 and 29 View FIGURES 25–29 ). Ectophallic invagination: posterior projections poorly sclerotized and quadrangular-shaped (similar to A. lucifugus ) (Ec.Pr, Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–29 ); ectophallic fold poorly sclerotized, lateral border slightly towards outside (Ec.F, Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–29 ). Endophallus: endophallic sclerite underdeveloped (End.Sc, Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–29 ).

Ecological Remarks

The single observed specimen of Adelosgryllus xambioa n. sp. was found in the Explosão cave, which is a marble cave with 1203 meters of horizontal projection. A quarry that used to remove marble from the outcrop led to the collapse of the main cave entrance. Therefore, in order to access the cave, one should enter through a small opening located at the base of the outcrop, leading to a very narrow passage ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 43–45 ). The floor along most part of the cave is covered with sediments ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 43–45 ), although a few fallen blocks are also present. The organic resources in the cave are especially bat guano produced by several bat species although deposits produced by hematophagous bats are the most common. Additionally, vegetal debris transported by water during strong rains also occur in some areas. The cave is devoid of any regular water flow, but several areas can be partially flooded during the rainy period. The single collected specimen was observed freely walking on the cave floor ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 43–45 ), close to a guano pile. It is important to mention that the cave was not entirely surveyed during our sampling, since a flashflood occurred forcing the team to quickly leave the cave. Accordingly, there is no information regarding the size of the species’ population and its density inside the cave. The region presents a climate Aw5 (according to the Köppen classification system), with an average annual precipitation of 1558 mm and an average annual temperature of 26.3ºC. The external area is altered, especially due to the removal of the natural vegetation and its replacement by Eucalyptus plantations. However, secondary forest surrounds the outcrop where the cave is located. As for the other species herein described, the epigean environments surrounding the cave were not sampled, so it is currently impossible to determine the habitat preference for this species. It is important to mention that despite the fact that the species was only found inside a cave, it does not exhibit any troglomorphic traits, thus not being a cave-restricted species. Since the external area was not sample, it is likely that the species’ distribution is much wider than currently known.

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF