Lithodidae, Samouelle, 1819
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24199/j.mmv.2003.60.16 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6367985A-FFC0-FFC0-3FCE-767FFCBFFB56 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Lithodidae |
status |
|
Key to genera of Lithodidae View in CoL
1. Abdomen usually soft, membranous, sac-like; abdominal tergites 3–5 not fully calcified ( Figs 1i View Figure 1 , 9a–d View Figure 9 ) rostral process short, broad, triangular, not usually overreaching distal margins of corneas....................... 2
— Abdomen generally firm, at least partially calcified, not sac-like; abdominal tergites 3–5 usually well calcified ( Figs 9f–k View Figure 9 ), sometimes with median areas membranous; rostral process well-developed, prominent, truncate or spiniform ( Fig. 8f, h View Figure 8 ), overreaching distal margins of corneas ( Fig. 3b View Figure 3 )............................. 6
2. Tergite of abdominal somite 2 divided into median, paired lateral and paired marginal plates ( Figs 9a, b, d, e, h View Figure 9 ). 3
— Tergite of abdominal somite 2 divided into paired lateral and marginal plates, median plate virtually nonexistent ( Fig. 9c View Figure 9 )................ Placetron Schalfeew, 1892 View in CoL
3. Median plate of abdominal somite 2 well calcified or with cluster of calcified granules ( Figs 9a, b View Figure 9 )............ 4
— Median plate of abdominal somite 2 membranous ( Fig. 9d View Figure 9 ) ........................................... 5
4. Carapace well calcified, dorsal surface and margins armed with numerous subequal spines; rostral process with dorsal and lateral spines....... Acantholithodes Holmes, 1895
— Carapace weakly calcified, dorsal surface lacking spines but setose or pubescent; rostral process simple, lacking dorsal and lateral spines ( Fig. 1i View Figure 1 )......................................... Hapalogaster Brandt, 1850
5. Surface of carapace covered with squamose prominences, chelipeds tuberculate ( Fig. 6p View Figure 6 ).......................................... Oedignathus Benedict, 1895
— Surface of carapace and chelipeds covered with transverse ridges or crests ( Fig. 6q View Figure 6 )..... Dermaturus Brandt, 1850
6. Carapace nearly smooth, unarmed, broader than long and completely covering ambulatory legs when legs are drawn in against body ( Figs 1h View Figure 1 , 8h View Figure 8 ); rostral process broad, compressed, distally truncate ( Fig. 1h View Figure 1 , 8h View Figure 8 ).................................... Cryptolithodes Brandt, 1848 View in CoL
— Carapace armed with granules, tubercles or spines, not broader than long and not completely covering ambulatory legs when legs are drawn in against body; rostral process variable in shape, but not compressed and distally truncate...........................................7
7. Sternite of somite XI (pereopods 2) with deep longitudinal medial groove or pit ( Fig. 2n View Figure 2 )................... 8
— Sternite of somite XI (pereopods 2) without deep longitudinal medial groove or pit................ 10
8. Tergite of abdominal somite 2 subdivided into median and paired lateral and marginal plates ( Figs 9a, b, d, e, h View Figure 9 ). 9
— Tergite of abdominal somite 2 usually subdivided into median and paired marginal plates ( Fig. 9i View Figure 9 ), rarely undivided................. Lithodes Latreille, 1806 View in CoL
9. Tergites of abdominal somites 3–5 with only spinulose or spiniform nodules calcified ( Fig. 9e View Figure 9 ) in males; females with lateral plates of left side well delineated; antennal acicle usually absent................................... Neolithodes A. Milne-Edwards and Bouvier, 1894 View in CoL
— Tergites of abdominal somites 3–5 with lateral plates clearly delineated in both sexes, median plate with nodular calcification, accessory marginal plates well developed ( Figs 9h, i View Figure 9 ); antennal acicle present........................................ Paralithodes Brandt, 1848 View in CoL
10. Tergite of abdominal somite 2 subdivided into 3–5 well calcified plates ( Figs 9 e, f, h, i View Figure 9 )................. 11
— Tergite of abdominal somite 2 undivided ( Figs 9g, j, k View Figure 9 )............................................12
11. Tergite of abdominal somite 2 subdivided into 3 plates (median and paired laterals) ( Fig. 9f View Figure 9 )..................................... Phyllolithodes Brandt, 1848 View in CoL
— Tergite of abdominal somite 2 subdivided into 5 plates (median, paired lateral and marginal) ( Figs 9e, h View Figure 9 )........................... Rhinolithode s Brandt, 1848
12. Rostral process thick, non-spiniform, hammer-shaped ( Fig. 1j View Figure 1 ); antennal acicle small, rudimentary; tergites of abdominal somites 4 and 5 with median plates irregularly calcified............. Sculptolithodes Makarov, 1934 View in CoL
— Rostral process more or less spiniform; antennal acicle well-developed; tergites of abdominal somites 4 and 5 with median plates regularly and entirely calcified ( Figs 9f, g, j, k View Figure 9 ) .................................... 13
13. Rostral process formed by anterior process (basal spine) and dorsal spine or granule ( Fig. 8g View Figure 8 )..................................... Glyptholithodes Faxon, 1895
— Rostral process formed by anterior process (basal spine) and at least 1 pair of dorsal spines ( Fig. 8f View Figure 8 )........ 14
14. Lateral tergal plates of abdominal somite 3 entire ( Figs 9f, j View Figure 9 ); antennal acicle moderately spinulose; walking leg 3 always equal to or longer than carapace width.................................. Paralomis White, 1856 View in CoL
— Lateral tergal plates of abdominal somite 3 each with small accessory plates sundered anteromedially ( Figs 9g, k View Figure 9 ); antennal acicle extremely spinulose; walking leg 3 never equal to or longer than carapace width.................................... Lopholithodes Brandt, 1848 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.