Parapaguridae, Smith, 1882

McLaughlin, P. A., 2003, Illustrated keys to families and genera of the superfamily Paguroidea (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura), with diagnoses of genera of Paguridae, Memoirs of Museum Victoria 60 (1), pp. 111-144 : 118

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.2003.60.16

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6367985A-FFC4-FFC3-3C64-7370FA1CF896

treatment provided by

Felipe (2024-06-21 17:31:48, last updated 2024-06-21 20:11:55)

scientific name

Parapaguridae
status

 

Key to genera of Parapaguridae View in CoL

1. Corneas present.............................. 2

— Corneas absent ( Fig. 8l View Figure 8 )........................................ Typhlopagurus de Saint Laurent, 1972 View in CoL

2. Rostrum short, not exceeding ocular peduncles...... 3

— Rostrum long, often exceeding ocular peduncles ( Fig. 1q View Figure 1 ).......................... Probeebei Boone, 1926 View in CoL

3. Ocular acicles distinctly developed ( Figs 8a–c, e, l View Figure 8 )... 4

— Ocular acicles weakly developed or obsolete ( Fig. 1p View Figure 1 )........................ Tylaspis Henderson, 1885 View in CoL

4. Posterior carapace mostly membranous; unpaired left pleopods 3–5................................ 5

— Posterior carapace calcified; asymmetrically paired pleopods 3–5......... Bivalvopagurus Lemaitre, 1993 View in CoL

5. Shield about as broad or broader than long; rostrum bluntly triangular or broadly rounded; abdomen flexed. 6

— Shield distinctly longer than broad; rostrum acutely triangular; abdomen straight.......................................... Tsunogaipagurus Osawa, 1995 View in CoL

6. Shield distinctly broader than long; dactyls of ambulatory legs straight or nearly so; corneas strongly dilated ( Fig. 3m View Figure 3 ); pleopod 2 of male with short exopod and strongly twisted distal segment ( Fig. 7e View Figure 7 )....................................... Strobopagurus Lemaitre, 1989 View in CoL

— Shield about as broad as long; dactyls of ambulatory legs curved; corneas moderately or weakly dilated; pleopod 2 of male lacking exopod and distal segment not twisted ( Fig. 7f View Figure 7 ) (rarely absent)........................ 7

7. Vestigial pleurobranch present on each side of somite XIV (thoracomere 8, above pereopod 5) ( Fig. 4e).................................. Sympagurus Smith, 1883 View in CoL

— Vestigial pleurobranch absent on each side of somite XIV (thoracomere 8, above pereopod 5)............... 8

8. Epistomial spine straight ( Fig. 8m View Figure 8 ) or absent........ 9

— Epistomial spine strongly curved upward................................. Oncopagurus Lemaitre, 1996 View in CoL

9. Gill structure bi- or quadriserial ( Figs 4f–h); segment 4 of antennal peduncle armed with dorsodistal spine; length of ocular peduncles, including corneas, at least half length of shield....... Paragiopagurus Lemaitre, 1996 View in CoL

— Gill structure quadriserial ( Figs 4g, h); segment 4 of antennal peduncle unarmed; length of ocular peduncles, including corneas, less than half length of shield (except Parapagurus bouvieri Stebbing, 1910 View in CoL )...................................... Parapagurus Smith, 1879 View in CoL

Boone, L. 1926. A new family of Crustacea. Preliminary technical description. New York Zoological Society Bulletin 29: 73.

Henderson, J. R. 1885. In: Tizard, T. H. et al., Narrative of the cruise of H. M. S. Challenger with a general account of the scientific results of the expedition. Report on the Scientific Results of the voyage of HMS Challenger during the years 1873 - 76. 1: 522 - 1110.

Gallery Image

Figure 1. Morphological diversity among members of the Paguroidea. a, b, Coenobitidae, c, Pylochelidae; d–g, Diogenidae; h–k, Lithodidae, l–o, Paguridae, p, q, Parapaguridae: a, Birgus latro Leach; b, Coenobita clypeatus (Fabricius); c, Trizocheles spinosus (Henderson); d, Allodardanus bredini Haig and Provenzano; e, Dardanus venosus (H. Milne Edwards); f, Clibanarius arethusa De Man; g, Calcinus tibicen (Herbst); h, Cryptolithodes sitchensis Brandt; i, Hapalogaster dentata (De Haan); j, Sculptolithodes derjugini Makarov; k, Lithodes murrayi Henderson; l, Labidochirus splendescens (Owen); m, Propagurus gaudichaudi (H. Milne Edwards); n, Ostraconotus spatulipes A. Milne–Edwards; o, Porcellanopagurus edwardsi Filhol; p, Tylaspis anomala Henderson; q, Probeebei mirabilis Boone. [a, f after Alcock, 1905; b, from Chace and Hobbs, 1969; c, k, p, from Henderson, 1888; d, e, g, after Chace et al. 1985; h, from Makarov, 1938; i, j, from Vinogradov, 1950; l from McLaughlin, 1974; m, from Benedict, 1901 as Eupagurus patagonensis Benedict; n, after A. Milne-Edwards and Bouvier, 1893; o, after Forest, 1951; q, from Wolff, 1961; not to scale.]

Gallery Image

Figure 3. Basic morphology: a, diagrammatic pagurid (whole animal, dorsal view); b, diagrammatic lithodid (whole animal, dorsal view). Cephalothorax or shield, with or without cephalic appendages: c–h Pylochelidae; i, Diogenidae; j, Pylojacquesidae; k–m Paguridae. c, Pylocheles; d, Trizocheles; e, Cheiroplatea; f, Pomatocheles; g, Parapylocheles; h, Cancellocheles; i, Diogenes; j, Pylojacquesia; k, Porcellanopagurus; l, Solitariopagurus; m, Hemipagurus. Abbreviations: aa = antennal acicle; ant. = antenna; antu = antennule; c, cornea; car = carpus; cg = cervical groove; dac = dactyl; ff = fixed finger; irp = intercalary rostral process; la = linea anomurica; lf ch = left cheliped; lf ur = left uropod; lp = lateral projection; lt = linea transversalis; mer = merus; oa = ocular acicle; op = ocular peduncle; P2–5 = pereopods 2–5; pcl = posterior carapace lobe; pcme = posterior carapace median element; pl3–5 = pleopods 3–5; plm = palm; pmp = posterior median plate; pop = postocular projection; pro = propodus; r = rostrum or rostral lobe; rt ch = right cheliped; s = shield; sl1–3 = shield lobes 1–3; t6 = abdominal tergite 6; tel = telson. [a, b, adapted from Sandberg and McLaughlin, 1998; c, d from Forest et al. 2000; e–h, from Forest, 1987; i, from McLaughlin and Clark, 1997; j, from McLaughlin and Lemaitre, 2001c; k, l, from McLaughlin, 2000; m, from McLaughlin, 1997 (as Catapagurus); not to scale.]

Gallery Image

Figure 7. Secondary sexual appendages and structures: a, coxae of pereopods 5 and abdominal somites 1 and 2 of male with pleopods 1 and 2 paired, modified; b, c, coxae of pereopods 5 and abdominal somite 1 of female with pleopod 1 paired, modified; d, female brood pouch; e–g, male pleopod 2; h–q, male sexual tubes; r, male gonopores without sexual tube development; s, coxa of right pereopod 5 of male with gonopore masked by tuft of stiff setae; t, coxa of left pereopod 5 of male with gonopore masked by tuft of stiff setae. [a, from Forest et al. 2000; b, from McLaughlin and Haig, 1995; c, q, r, from McLaughlin and Lemaitre, 2001b; d, from McLaughlin and Provenzano, 1975; e, f, from Lemaitre, 1989; g, from Forest, 1995; i–n from McLaughlin, 1997; h, from Wang and McLaughlin, 2000; p, from McLaughlin, 1986; s, from Melin, 1939; t, from Forest, 1961; not to scale].

Gallery Image

Figure 8. Additional morphological characters: a, c, shield with Y-shaped posterior groove; b, shield without Y-shaped posterior groove; d, last thoracic somite and abdomen of Xylopagurus (dorsal view); e, multifid ocular acicles; f, Lithodes rostral spine complex; g, dorsal and ventral rostral spines of Glyptolithodes; h, Cryptolithodes (ventral view) with carapace covering body and appendages; i, rostrum with epirostral spine (lateral view); j, symmetrical uropods and posterior portion of abdominal tergite 6, plus telson (dorsal view) k, right antennal peduncle with hooked spine (indicated by arrow) on lateral margin of segment 1; l, shield of Typhlopagurus showing spinose ocular and antennal acicles and lack of ocular peduncles; m, parapagurid epistome and labrum. Abbreviations: apr = anterior rostral process; ds = dorsal spine(s); es = epistomial spine; ls = labral spine; vs = ventral spine; 6 indicates abdominal tergite 6. [a, from McLaughlin and Hoover, 1996; b, from Forest and de Saint Laurent, 1968; c, from Forest and McLaughlin, 2000; d, from Lemaitre, 1995; e, McLaughlin and Murray, 1990; f, from Vinogradov, 1950; g, after Haig, 1974; h, from Makarov, 1938; i, from McLaughlin, 1997; j, from McLaughlin and Lemaitre, 1993; k, from McLaughlin, 1981; l, from de Saint Laurent, 1972; m, after Lemaitre, 1989; not to scale].