Cyathea rufescens (Mett. ex Kuhn) Domin (1929: 264)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.26.1.6 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6446F468-7636-0A6D-7DC4-F8741880FD04 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cyathea rufescens (Mett. ex Kuhn) Domin (1929: 264) |
status |
|
34. Cyathea rufescens (Mett. ex Kuhn) Domin (1929: 264) View in CoL . Hemitelia rufescens Mett. ex Kuhn (1869: 159) . Sphaeropteris rufescens (Mett. ex Kuhn) Windisch (1973: 372) . Type:— PERU. San Martin: Prov. San Martin, “in monte Guayrapurima, prope Tarapoto, Peruviae orientalis,” August 1856, Spruce 4727 (holotype BM, fragment US, isotypes K, fragment US, TCD).
Distribution and habitat: — Peru, San Martin, in mountain rainforest and ridge top vegetation between ca. 1200–1500 m.
Remarks: — Cyathea rufescens is easily recognized by its long triangular segments and easily detached scurf on the laminar axes. With C. macrocarpa , C. macrosora , C. traillii , and C. vaupensis , it shares a special type of narrowly triangular petiole scale, which has rectangular to hook-shaped basal lobes and narrow, fimbriate to ciliate margins.
Cyathea rufescens was long only known from the type collection in northern Peru. The type locality, Mt. Guayarapurina, is not marked on recent maps and most locals have only a faint idea where the mountain might be. In July 2002, M. Christenhusz managed to reach this locus classicus because Spruce’s itinerary gives a fairly good description of its position, and he also collected several specimens of tree ferns there. What I first identified as C. rufescens among these collections, later turned out to be C. pilosissima (Baker) Domin (1929: 263) . In November 2011, I went to Mt. Guayrapurina myself and found Cyathea rufescens still in fair numbers ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). It occurs on slopes of mountains adjacent to a fertile plain, and the forest in which it grows evidently yields no valuable timber, so the species seems not directly threatened by human activity. However, the known range is very small and could be easily destroyed by one mayor fire incident. The conservation status of C. rufescens is therefore considered as “endangered” (EN B2a; IUCN 2001).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |