Epinotia cinereana ( Haworth, 1811 )

Mutanen, Marko, Aarvik, Leif, Landry, Jean-François, Segerer, Andreas H. & Karsholt, Ole, 2012, Epinotia cinereana (Haworth, 1811) bona sp., a Holarctic tortricid distinct from E. nisella (Clerck, 1759) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae: Eucosmini) as evidenced by DNA barcodes, morphology and life history, Zootaxa 3318, pp. 1-25 : 5-6

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.211502

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6168590

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/656D2C0C-4044-B564-189E-F980FDB72280

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Epinotia cinereana ( Haworth, 1811 )
status

 

Epinotia cinereana ( Haworth, 1811) View in CoL

Figures 2 View FIGURE 2 A–2B, 3A–3J, 5A–5C, 6A–6C, 7A–7C, 8A–8C

Tortrix cinereana Haworth, 1811: 451 View in CoL . TL: Great Britain.

Tortrix petrana Hübner, 1813 View in CoL : pl. 33, fig. 210. Revised synonymy.

Steganoptycha cinerana Stephens, 1829: 177 View in CoL . Misspelling.

Proteopteryx criddleana Kearfott, 1907: 58 View in CoL . TL: Canada, Manitoba: Aweme (AMNH, examined). New synonymy.

Diagnosis. The forewing pattern of the nominal subspecies of E. cinereana ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 A–2B) consists of white and blackish spots and striae which together give a grey impression. In fresh specimens the light elements have a yellowish tinge and the dark ones slightly bluish. Often the light colour forms a broad, irregular band along dorsum from base to tornus. The reddish or black dorsal blotch that is present in most specimens of E. nisella is absent in E. cinereana .

The North American specimens ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 A–3J) appear more variable than European specimens. They may have the forewing suffused with reddish, particularly along dorsum. The sub-basal and basal fasciae form a compact dark blotch, which may reach dorsum. In European specimens only the sub-basal fascia is distinct. Wingspan: North American specimens: 14.7–18.7 mm, mean = 17.0 mm (N = 31); European specimens: 14.0–18.0 mm.

Male genitalia ( Figs. 5 View FIGURE 5 A–5C, 6A–6C). The valva is slightly (about 15%) narrower than in E. nisella . This is difficult to see unless a series of preparations are compared. The number of cornuti in the phallus is 13–20 versus 40–50 in E. nisella . Tergite VIII is distinctly narrower medially in E. cinereana than in E. nisella . The lateral processes anteriorly on sternite VIII are broader and more curved in E. cinereana than in E. nisella . In E. nisella the processes are relatively narrow and pointing straight to the side. The medial “stem” of the sternite is much narrower in E. cinereana than in E. nisella .

Female genitalia ( Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 A–7C, 8A–8C). The sterigma is cylindrical with strongly sclerotised lateral edges and large triangular processes. The signa are much larger in E. cinereana than in E. nisella , their surface area totalling on average more than 2.75% of the surface area of the flattened bursa.

Life history. The larva is described as pale yellowish-green, with a dark green irregular dorsal vessel, spots invisible, and hairs very delicate; head chestnut-brown, with darker eyes and jaws, prothoracic shield faintly tinged with brown, anal plate hardly distinguishable. It lives between leaves of Populus tremula , which it ties flatly together, without roll or fold, eating away the parenchyma ( Barrett 1882).

MacKay (1965) described and illustrated in detail the larva of North American specimens. According to her, the larva can be distinguished from that of E. nisella and other Epinotia species by the short D1 setae on the anal shield (long in E. nisella ), the presence of three SV setae on A2 (two in E. nisella ) and higher number of crochets (40 on ventral proleg, 30 on anal proleg; vs 25 and 18–19 respectively for E. nisella ); it is also generally paler with a yellowish head and pale body (in E. nisella , head yellowish brown, thoracic shield yellowish brown or brown). In North America, E. cinereana is recorded primarily from Populus tremuloides , but there are also less frequent reports on P. balsamifera , P. trichocarpa , Salix and Quercus macrocarpa ( Prentice 1965, Miller 1986). The Quercus records seem dubious and we have been unable to locate reared adult vouchers to verify them. It is possible that they represent misidentifications of oak-feeding Pseudexentera species: Pseudexentera larvae have been confused with Epinotia larvae previously (Mackay 1957, Kusch 1967). The larvae feed primarily on catkins of P. tre m u - loides but have also been reported to bore into branchlets of P. balsamifera ( Miller 1986) .

Distribution. Widely distributed in northern Europe with confirmed records from Great Britain, Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark. In Central Europe known from Germany, most probaly also occurring in adjacent countries. Scattered records throughout Russia from the St. Petersburg region to south-eastern Siberia, including the Ural and the Altai Mountains ( Sinev & Nedoshivina 2009); Japan ( Oku 2004). Probably also in China ( Liu 1981: fig. 242 middle). In North America, E. cinereana ranges from Quebec and New Brunswick to British Columbia in Canada, northward into the boreal zone, and south in the United States to Iowa and Colorado ( Gilligan et al. 2008 for US distribution).

Remarks on type material. Tortrix cinereana was described from an unstated number of specimens (“ infrequentissime ”) found on lichen-covered tree trunks in forest(s) in Great Britain ( Haworth 1811). The type is probably lost (K. Tuck, in litt.). We base the identity of T. cinereana on Pierce & Metcalfe’s (1922) work. They documented the differences in the genitalia between E. nisella and E. cinereana , and we consider them as first revisers.

Tortrix petrana is based on the figure under this name in the work of Hübner (1799–1833). The number of specimens and type locality are not stated, although the latter is probably southern Germany. The type is probably lost. Tortrix petrana was hitherto considered a synonym of E. nisella .

Proteopteryx criddleana was described from 17 specimens including both males and females collected in Aweme, Manitoba on July 24, 1904 ( Kearfott 1907). A lectotype 3 in AMNH is here designated. It is labelled: “Criddle | Aweme | Man. | 24.vii.04 ” [printed with date handwritten]; “ Proteopteryx | criddleana | Cotype Kearfott.” [handwritten; “Kearfott Col. | Ac. 4667” [printed]; “COTYPE | No. | A.M.N.H.” [red, printed]; “Needs | LECTOTYPE ” [pale blue, half printed, half handwritten]; “genitalia slide | JFL 17073” [pale green, printed with male symbol handwritten]; “ LECTOTYPE 3 | Proteopteryx | criddleana | Kearfott | by J.-F. Landry 2011” [orange, part printed, part handwritten]. One paralectotype male in CNC, with same collecting date as lectotype. Abdomen missing.

Steganoptycha cinerana ( Stephens 1829) is a misspelling of Tortrix cinereana Haworth. View in CoL

Other remarks. Dombroskie also communicated the following: ”I have collected E. nisella View in CoL from across the boreal in Canada, and the only place I have encountered E. criddleana is in Alberta. I find the two species in roughly equal abundance in the boreal and wooded areas in the prairies, but in one site in the mountains (Kootenay Plains), the latter species is by far the most common (I have got well over 200 specimens in a night)” (email of 1 Dec 2011 to JFL, with permission to cite).

AMNH

American Museum of Natural History

CNC

Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Tortricidae

Genus

Epinotia

Loc

Epinotia cinereana ( Haworth, 1811 )

Mutanen, Marko, Aarvik, Leif, Landry, Jean-François, Segerer, Andreas H. & Karsholt, Ole 2012
2012
Loc

Proteopteryx criddleana

Kearfott 1907: 58
1907
Loc

Steganoptycha cinerana

Stephens 1829: 177
1829
Loc

Tortrix cinereana

Haworth 1811: 451
1811
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF