Cistudinella inanis ( Boheman, 1854 )

Sekerka, Lukáš, 2016, Taxonomic and nomenclatural changes in Cassidinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 56 (1), pp. 275-344 : 310-311

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5305725

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E24F1028-C6AC-4323-9ED5-C9B7FF3434ACD

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6450022

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/677FCF20-FFF9-FFD5-FE71-FCB1FD7CFEE3

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Cistudinella inanis ( Boheman, 1854 )
status

 

Cistudinella inanis ( Boheman, 1854) View in CoL

Ischyrosonyx inanis Boheman, 1854: 324 (original description).

Cistudinella biguttata Hincks, 1956: 557 View in CoL (original description), syn. nov.

Type localities. Ischyrosonyx inanis : ‘Brasilia’; Cistudinella biguttata : Brazil, Santa Catarina, Nova Teutonia.

Type material examined. Ischyrosonyx inanis : LECTOTYPE (designated by BOROWIEC 1999a): ♂, pinned, ‘ Brasil [w, p, s] || Bhn. [w, p, s] || LECTOTYPE | des. L. Borowiec [r, p, cb] || NHRS-JLKB | 000021011 [w, p, cb]’ ( NHRS).

Cistudinella biguttata : HOLOTYPE: ♀, pinned (right antennomere missing), ‘ Brasilien | Nova Teutonia | 27° 11’ B. 52° 23’ L | Fritz Plaumann | 7.II.[hw] 193[p]9[hw] [w, p, cb, bf; last row written vertically on left side] || TYPE [p] | Cistudinella | biguttata | Hincks [pi, hw by Hincks, cb] || Cistudinella | biguttata | Hincks TYPE. | Det.W.D.Hincks [w, hw by Hincks, cb]’ ( NHMB).

Remarks. HINCKS (1956) stated following: ‘This species [ Cistudinella biguttata ] is perhaps most closely allied to C. inanis with which it agrees in coloration and in having the caudal angles of the pronotum produced. The pronotum however is not so broad as in that species, the sinuation of the sides of the elytra is distinctly less marked, and the elytral puncturation is stronger. The surface is generally duller due to the presence of micro-sculpture.’

I had an opportunity to study types of both taxa as well as additional specimens in the Spaethʼs collection, which Hincks had at disposal and in my opinion all belong to a single species. The characters Hincks used to separate both taxa result from sexual dimorphism (width of the pronotum and lateral sinuation of the elytra) as males of Cistudinella generally have a much broader pronotum than females. The difference in punctation of elytra is matter of specimen preservation. The holotype of C. biguttata is perfectly preserved, with a fully hardened body, elytra not contaminated by fat and perfect colouration, resulting in the punctation being more obvious, including areolae and particularly micropunctation on intervals. In contrast, specimens of C. inanis from Spaeth collection are darkened due to fat accumulation or partial sclerotisation.As a result, the micropunctation on intervals is indistinct and punctures in striae look much finer. I therefore synonymize C. biguttata with C. inanis .

Distribution. Brazil: Santa Catarina ( HINCKS 1956).

NHRS

Swedish Museum of Natural History, Entomology Collections

NHMB

Natural History Museum Bucharest

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Chrysomelidae

Genus

Cistudinella

Loc

Cistudinella inanis ( Boheman, 1854 )

Sekerka, Lukáš 2016
2016
Loc

Cistudinella biguttata

HINCKS W. D. 1956: 557
1956
Loc

Ischyrosonyx inanis

BOHEMAN C. H. 1854: 324
1854
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF