Parthenicus, REUTER, 1876
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0082(2007)3593[1:SOTENA]2.0.CO;2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/693D8355-FFE9-0F07-FF55-75BF75EFC62A |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Parthenicus |
status |
|
PARTHENICUS REUTER View in CoL View at ENA
Parthenicus Reuter, 1876: 84 View in CoL (orig. descrip.), Kirkaldy, 1906: 128 (list); Carvalho, 1958: 122 (cat.), Knight, 1968: 129 (n. spp., key western spp.); Henry, 1982: 355 (descrip., key eastern spp.); Henry and Wheeler, 1988: 436 (cat.); Schuh, 1995: 177 (cat.). Type species: Parthenicus psalliodes Reuter. Monotypic. View in CoL
DIAGNOSIS: Species of Parthenicus are distinguished by the small size, dull to weakly shining, impunctate, dorsal surface, the absence of a basal carina on the head, the sericeous and scalelike setae on the dorsum, and the saltatorial hindlegs. The enlarged or swollen hindfemora give species in this genus the capability to jump, a trait that is especially apparent in brachypterous females and nymphs.
DESCRIPTION: Small, length 4.5 mm or less (eastern U.S. spp. 3.5 mm or less), elongate oval, impunctate; head without a distinct carina, eyes large, strongly granulate (more so in males); labium extending to metacoxae or beyond; pubescence simple, intermixed with golden, silvery, and/or black sericeous to scalelike setae, with black, scalelike setae especially abundant on cuneus and apical area of corium; hemelytra subparallel; males macropterous with the hemelytra and membrane well developed; females macropterous or brachypterous, membrane and cuneus often strongly abbreviated or coleopteriform, with the claval suture absent, forming a beetlelike ‘‘elytron’’; hindfemora strongly saltatorial; and parempodia fleshy and convergent. Vesica enclosed in a prominent phallothecal sheath and usually bearing one or two simple spiculi; the left paramere usually C-shaped, with base thickened and the arch of the C gradually tapered; and the right paramere ranging from straight, thickened, and spined distally to slender and arching or C-shaped.
DISCUSSION: Considerable variation in col- or and markings of some species makes study of male genitalia essential for positive identification of species. The parameres, though relatively simple compared with many orthotylines, are distinctive for most species (Knight, 1964; Henry 1982; Scudder and Schwartz, 2003). The left paramere ( figs. 25 View Figs , 28, 56, 74) is somewhat C-shaped, with the distal neck becoming much more slender than the base. The right paramere is comprised of a stout stem, usually with an apical spine or tubercle ( figs. 57 View Figs , 75 View Figs ), often with an acute lateral process or serrate ridge (fig. 29), or may be more slender, arching, and C-shaped ( fig. 26 View Figs ). The phallotheca ( figs. 27 View Figs , 30, 59, 77) is attached to the phallobase, but it protrudes well into the genital capsule opening and is visible behind the parameres when view caudally. This is unusual for most genera of Orthotylini I have studied, and is analogous only with members of the tribe Ceratocapsini and at least some Austromirini .
An analysis of relationships within Parthenicus is beyond the scope of this paper and must await a comprehensive generic revision. There are, however, clear indications of species groups based on male genitalia, even within the eastern species. The parameres are very homogeneous among most of the eastern species ( Henry, 1982). The left paramere groups the species P. cruentus , P. juniperi , P. knighti , P. psalliodes , P. rufus , P. taxodii , P. vaccini , and P. weemsi , and the right paramere groups these same species, with the exception of P. cruentus and P. vaccini . Interestingly, the eastern species grouped by parameres also are the ones having only fully macropterous females. Parthenicus cruentus , P. sedumicola , P. vaccini , and P. wheeleri all have some form of brachyptery in females, a trait commonly seen in species from arid habitats, including pine barrens of the East where P. vaccini is found ( Henry, 1978; Roble and Hoffman, 2000).
The relationship of Parthenicus with other Orthotylinae also is unknown. Schuh (1974) considered Parthenicus to have typical Orthotylus - type male genitalia, with welldeveloped, long, heavily schlerotized spiculi on the vesica. My dissections confirm that each eastern species has at least one, and often two, simple spiculi ( figs. 27 View Figs , 30), one of which may be relatively elaborate ( fig. 76 View Figs ), with multiple processes. As noted above, of all Orthotylini I have examined, Parthenicus is the only genus having the phallotheca visible externally within the genital capsule opening, a condition not too unlike that found in the Austromirini and Ceratocapsini .
KEY TO THE SPECIES OF PARTHENICUS IN View in CoL EASTERN UNITED STATES
1. Tibial spines without distinct spots at bases or, at most, with a few vague spots on the basal third of the hindtibia............... 2
– Tibial spines with distinct red or brown spots at bases on all tibiae................. 6
2. Metafemora strongly infuscated; dorsum with black scalelike setae................ 3
– Metafemora uniformly pale yellow or testaceous, never fuscous; dorsum without black scalelike setae.................... 5
3. Pronotum and hemelytra usually pale to yellowish brown, lacking red spots, but usually tinged with red or salmon pink, especially on cuneus; scutellum predominantly fuscous; hindfemora reddish brown to almost fuscous, except for a narrow pale area along ventral surface; black scalelike setae concentrated on scutellum and apical one-third of corium; both males and females macropterous; distribution widespread in the eastern United States; hosts Juniperus spp. and other Cupressaceae View in CoL .............................. juniperi (Heidemann) View in CoL
– Pronotum and hemelytra pale, with scattered red to reddish-brown spots; scutellum pale, sometimes weakly infuscated basally, but always with apex pale; hindfemora uniformly red to reddish brown on distal two-thirds, never pale ventrally; black scalelike setae more evenly scattered on hemelytra or nearly absent; male macropterous, known females strongly brachypterous.............. 4
4. Antennal segment I in males longer than width of vertex between eyes, in females subequal to width of vertex; left paramere ( fig. 56 View Figs ), right paramere ( fig. 57 View Figs ); distribution Arkansas; host Sedum sp. ........ sedumicola View in CoL , n.sp.
– Antennal segment I in males and females less than width of vertex between eyes; left paramere ( fig. 74 View Figs ), right paramere ( fig. 75 View Figs ); distribution Oklahoma and Texas; hosts selected species of Poaceae View in CoL .. wheeleri View in CoL , n.sp.
5. Dorsum uniformly yellow, without red or fuscous markings; hemelytral membrane smoky gray; rostrum short, just reaching middle of metacoxae; distribution Maryland to Florida, west to Missouri; host Taxodium distichum View in CoL ............... taxodii Knight View in CoL
– Dorsum yellow to testaceous, with the base and outer margin of the clavus and base of cuneus accented with red or small red spots, and basal angles of scutellum weakly infuscated; hemelytral membrane uniformly fuscous to black; rostrum long, extending beyond metacoxae; distribution coastal Florida; host unknown.............. knighti Henry View in CoL
6. Dorsum and ventral surface predominantly deep red to reddish orange, with only a few, small, irregular pale areas showing through red............................ 7
– Dorsum and ventral surface pale grayish, testaceous, or pale brownish to reddish orange, not predominantly red or reddish
11 Jul 1986). 2, P. cruentus View in CoL , female (same data as for male). 3, P. juniperi View in CoL , male (Maryland, Montgomery Co., orange, with or without red or brown spots.......................... 8
7. Corium and clavus uniformly deep red to reddish orange with only a few fine, irregular, pale areas; white scalelike setae concentrated narrowly along posterior pronotal margin, basal half of scutellum, and apex of clavus; spots at bases of tibial spines small, red, often indistinct or diffused; distribution Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina; hosts Hypericum spp. ........... rufus Henry View in CoL
– Corium deep red to reddish orange, clavus largely pale with only a few small, scattered, red spots; pronotal disk, scutellum, and clavus densely clothed with white scalelike setae; spots at bases of tibial spines distinct and deep red to dark brown; distribution Florida; host Ceratiola ericoides View in CoL .................... weemsi Henry View in CoL (dark form)
8. Dorsum, first and second antennal segments, and legs pale gray or grayish green, with numerous brown to fuscous spots; wing membrane white with two fuscous clouds apically; females usually brachypterous; distribution eastern coast, west to Michigan in the north; host Hudsonia spp. and Lechia maritima ........... vaccini (Van Duzee) View in CoL
– Dorsum testaceous or pale brownish to reddish orange, with numerous to only a few red spots on dorsum.................. 9
9. Dorsum pale brownish or reddish orange, with only a few brown or red spots at base and apex of corium, spots on legs red; antennae uniformly pale testaceous, without spots; wing membrane smoky brown; females macropterous; distribution Florida; host Ceratiola ericoides View in CoL ......... weemsi Henry View in CoL (pale form)
– Dorsum pale whitish or yellowish brown, with numerous red spots............... 10
10. Hemelytral membrane uniformly dark or fumate; males and females always macropterous; distribution Florida and South Carolina to Texas; hosts Asteraceae View in CoL ... psalliodes Reuter View in CoL
– Hemelytral membrane pale translucent with two quadrate fumate blotches on outer margin; males macropterous, females often brachypterous with wing membrane reduced; distribution eastern Nebraska; host Asteraceae View in CoL ............. cruentus View in CoL , n.sp.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Parthenicus
HENRY, THOMAS J. 2007 |
Parthenicus
Schuh, R. T. 1995: 177 |
Henry, T. J. & A. G. Wheeler, Jr. 1988: 436 |
Henry, T. J. 1982: 355 |
Knight, H. H. 1968: 129 |
Carvalho, J. C. M. 1958: 122 |
Kirkaldy, G. W. 1906: 128 |
Reuter, O. M. 1876: 84 |