Hypoborus ficus (Erichson, 1836)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4098.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:00F1BDB5-AB25-47A0-B789-2E05D2E683DE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5669413 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6B5C9A7C-475B-FFDD-C797-E342FA48F9D0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hypoborus ficus (Erichson, 1836) |
status |
|
Hypoborus ficus (Erichson, 1836) View in CoL
Distribution in Iran. Fars, Khorasan, Tehran ( Modarres Awal 1997), Guilan ( Modarres Awal 1997; Amini et al. 2013), Iran (no locality cited) ( Mifsud & Knížek 2009; Knížek 2011).
General distribution. Southern Europe, Azores, North Africa, East to Tajikistan.
Biology. Recorded in Iran from Ficus carica and Ficus sp. ( Moraceae ) ( Modarres Awal 1997; Amini et al. 2013). Kadyrov (1989) gives a brief account of the biology of the species in Tajikistan, and indicates that it is a serious pest of figs in that country. The species attacks weakened trees, and can cause death of branches and trees if present in high numbers ( Akşit et al. 2007). Infestations occur throughout the entire year. Akşit et al. (2007) note that the parasitic mite, Pyemotes johnmoseri (Khaustov) , was abundant in the gallery systems in Turkey attacking primarily the larvae. Mendel (1986) notes abundant attacks by an apparently host-specific braconid parasite, Ecphylus caudatus Ruschka. However , the potential of these species to act as biological control agents is uncertain.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |