Leptolepis curvisulcatus ( Schroeder , 1956)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zitteliana.96.81737 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CD8C70BA-0253-4540-8EFC-D430A12F6B35 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6CEBFA1E-A2EA-5A98-9BAD-EB52261BA48A |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Leptolepis curvisulcatus ( Schroeder , 1956) |
status |
|
Leptolepis curvisulcatus ( Schroeder, 1956)
Plate 1, figs 15-19 View Plate 1
Otolithus curvisulcatus 1956 Otolithus curvisulcatus - Schröder: pl. 7, figs 25-27.
Otolithus opalini 1956 Otolithus opalini - Schröder: pl. 6, figs 7-8 (non fig. 9).
Otolithus schattenbergi 1956 Otolithus schattenbergi - Schröder: pl. 6, figs 10-12.
Leptolepis ornatus 2018 Leptolepis ornatus (Weiler, 1953) - Schwarzhans: fig. 1I-J, ?K.
Material.
15 specimens from Schröder’s collection from the late Toarcian to early Aalenian: holotype of Ot. curvisulcatus from Kremmeldorf (SNSB-BSPG 2022 III 42, Plate 1 View Plate 1 , fig. 16) and 3 paratypes of Ot. curvisulcatus , thereof 2 from Kremmeldorf and 1 from Freiahorn (SNSB-BSPG 2022 III 43-45), holotype of Ot. opalini from Kremmeldorf (SNSB-BSPG 2022 III 16, Plate 1 View Plate 1 , fig. 19) and 3 paratypes of Ot. opalini from Kremmeldorf (SNSB-BSPG 2022 III 17-19, Plate 1 View Plate 1 , fig. 15), holotype of Ot. schattenbergi from Kremmelsdorf (SNSB-BSPG 2022 III 2, Plate 1 View Plate 1 , fig. 17), 6 paratypes of Ot. schattenbergi with 5 from Kremmelsdorf (SNSB-BSPG 2022 III 3-5, 47-48, Plate 1 View Plate 1 , fig. 18) and 1 from Peulendorf (SNSB-BSPG 2022 III 46).
Differential diagnosis.
Leptolepis curvisulcatus is slightly more elongate than L. normandica with an OL:OH ratio of 1.4-1.6 (vs. 1.25-1.45), which is mainly caused by a relatively low postdorsal rim, which is also more rounded. Other proportions and characteristics are shared with L. normandica . Leptolepis curvisulcatus also differs from L. normandica in its longer ostium as compared to the length of its cauda, but because of the gradual transition from ostium to cauda, this feature cannot be measured unequivocally. The rounded and short postdorsal rim distinguishes L. curvisulcatus from the coeval L. kremmeldorfensis .
Discussion.
The distinctions among the three nominal late Toarcian to Aalenian species L. normandica , L. curvisulcatus , and L. kremmeldorfensis are all very subtle and it is possible that with more material becoming available from this time interval their nature and validity may have to be revised again. This is also because most specimens so far known from L. curvisulcatus and L. kremmeldorfensis are smaller than 1.5 mm in length and, therefore, cannot be considered morphologically mature. Schröder (1956) mentioned that the slightly curved shape of the sulcus (cauda) is a distinctive character of the species (hence the name curvisulcatus). However, this character does not seem to be reliable for its distinction from otoliths of L. normandica , and we therefore consider it to reflect a degree of variability.
The best-preserved and largest specimen that we attribute to L. curvisulcatus is a paratype of Schröder’s Otolithus opalini of 2.55 mm in length (Plate 1 View Plate 1 , fig. 16), while the specimen selected as holotype represents a small and poorly preserved otolith of 1.25 mm in length (Plate 1 View Plate 1 , fig. 19). The holotype of L. curvisulcatus is the next best-preserved specimen of 2.25 mm in length, and we have thus chosen this name to represent this nominal species. Schwarzhans (2018) could not review Schröder’s specimens and attributed similar specimens from the same stratigraphic interval to L. ornatus (Weiler, 1953). Unfortunately, Weiler’s type-material has not been located and is not available for revision. His documentation is rather indistinct, so we therefore propose no longer using this name and instead refer to L. curvisulcatus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Leptolepis curvisulcatus ( Schroeder , 1956)
Schwarzhans, Werner & Keupp, Helmut 2022 |
Leptolepis ornatus
Schwarzhans & Keupp 2022 |
Leptolepis ornatus
Schwarzhans & Keupp 2022 |
Otolithus curvisulcatus
Koken 1884 |
Otolithus curvisulcatus
Koken 1884 |
Otolithus opalini
Koken 1884 |
Otolithus opalini
Koken 1884 |
Otolithus schattenbergi
Koken 1884 |
Otolithus schattenbergi
Koken 1884 |