Caraphia, Gahan, 1906
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4084.2.2 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8DFDBA28-DC46-4CAC-971A-A4F4170B4451 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6075459 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6E0487D8-FF8D-573B-FF5D-2F8DFA6BFC16 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Caraphia |
| status |
|
Key to the species of the genus Caraphia View in CoL
1. Elytra provided with rows of scales nearly alternately associated with rows of foveae................................ 2
- Elytra provided with rows of scales mostly along every row of foveae........................................... 11
2. Antenna with scape short and robust, not reaching the anterior margin of pronotum................................. 3
- Antenna with scape long and slender, exceeding the anterior margin of pronotum................................... 6
3. Elytral disk longitudinally depressed beside suture and forming weak longitudinal ridges on apical half.................. 4
- Elytral disk flattened but not depressed beside suture; without ridges............................................. 5
4. Pronotum shorter than basal width, moderately constricted near apical fourth; scales on head and pronotum grayish yellow...................................................... C. cribrata Gahan, 1906 View in CoL ( Figs 6, 7, 8 View FIGURES 6 – 22 , 43 View FIGURES 37 – 49 , 50 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 66 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 82 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 98 View FIGURES 98 – 113 , 114 View FIGURES 114 – 121 )
- Pronotum longer than basal width, strongly constricted near apical third; scales on head and pronotum orange yellow.................................................. C. depressa Holzschuh, 2003 View in CoL ( Figs 14, 15, 16 View FIGURES 6 – 22 , 45 View FIGURES 37 – 49 , 53 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 69 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 85 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 101 View FIGURES 98 – 113 , 116 View FIGURES 114 – 121 )
5. Body smaller; head with interocular distance narrow, ca 0.3 times as wide as head............................................................................................... C. minor Gahan, 1906 View in CoL ( Figs 12, 13 View FIGURES 6 – 22 , 52 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 68 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 84 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 100 View FIGURES 98 – 113 )
- Body larger; head with interocular distance wide, ca 0.5 times as wide as head................................................................................. C. granulifera Holzschuh, 1984 View in CoL ( Figs 9, 10, 11 View FIGURES 6 – 22 , 44 View FIGURES 37 – 49 , 51 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 67 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 83 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 99 View FIGURES 98 – 113 , 115 View FIGURES 114 – 121 )
6. Body entirely black; pronotal disk strongly convex..... C. ebenina Holzschuh, 1989 View in CoL ( Figs 17, 18 View FIGURES 6 – 22 , 46 View FIGURES 37 – 49 , 54 View FIGURES 50 – 65 ,, 70, 86, 102, 117)
- Body blackish brown to reddish brown. Pronotal disk not convex................................................ 7
7. Elytra short, about 2.3 times as long as elytral width.... C. seriata ( Chemsak & Linsley, 1984) View in CoL ( Figs 40, 41 View FIGURES 37 – 49 , 64 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 80 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 96 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 112 View FIGURES 98 – 113 )
- Elytra elongate, more than 2.5 times as long as elytral width.................................................... 8
8. Scales on the pronotum shortened on apical half besides median area and forming indistinct triple longitudinal vittae.................................................... C. laosica Gressitt & Rondon, 1970 View in CoL ( Figs 19, 20 View FIGURES 6 – 22 , 55 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 71 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 87 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 103 View FIGURES 98 – 113 , 118 View FIGURES 114 – 121 )
- Scales on the pronotum uniform and not forming longitudinal vittae............................................. 9
9. Elytra more than 2.7 times as long as wide; parameres of tegmen long, 0.30 times as long as tegmen.............................................................. C. thailandica Hayashi & Villiers, 1987 View in CoL ( Figs 21, 22 View FIGURES 6 – 22 , 56 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 72 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 88 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 104 View FIGURES 98 – 113 , 119 View FIGURES 114 – 121 )
- Elytra less than 2.5 times as long as wide; parameres of tegmen short, less than 0.2 times as long as tegmen............ 10
10. Antennae 1.3 times as long as body length; parameres of tegmen very short, 0.15 times as long as tegmen................................................................. C. borneana Vives, 2005 View in CoL ( Figs 23, 24 View FIGURES 23 – 36 , 47 View FIGURES 37 – 49 , 57 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 73 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 89 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 105 View FIGURES 98 – 113 , 120 View FIGURES 114 – 121 )
- Antennae 1.5 times as long as body length; parameres of tegmen moderate in length, 0.23 times as long as tegmen.................................................................. C. huai View in CoL sp. nov. ( Figs 25, 26, 27 View FIGURES 23 – 36 , 58 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 74 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 90 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 106 View FIGURES 98 – 113 , 121 View FIGURES 114 – 121 )
11. Scales of elytra spindle-shaped; sides of pronotum angulate or roundly inflated laterally near middle;................. 12
- Scales of elytra rod-shaped; sides of pronotum nearly straightly narrowed apically................................ 13
12. Scales of elytra ca 4 times as long as wide; elytral apex obliquely truncate..................................................................................... C. squamosa ( Chemsak & Linsley, 1984) View in CoL ( Figs 39, 48 View FIGURES 37 – 49 ,, 63, 79, 95, 111)
- Scales of elytra ca 6 times as long as wide; elytral apex roundly narrowed to sutural angles................................................................................... C. lingafelteri View in CoL sp. nov. ( Figs 42, 49 View FIGURES 37 – 49 , 65 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 81 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 97 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 113 View FIGURES 98 – 113 , 127 View FIGURES 122 – 127 )
13. Antennae long, apical 4 segments exceeding elytral apex.................................................... 14
- Antennae with apical 1 to 3 segments exceeding elytral apex................................................. 15
14. Body larger; parameres of tegmen moderate in length, 0.22 times as long as tegmen: tegmen with dorsal plate shorter than ven- tral plate.................................... C. taiwana Chou & Ohbayashi, 2008 View in CoL ( Figs 35, 36 View FIGURES 23 – 36 , 61 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 77 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 93 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 109 View FIGURES 98 – 113 , 125 View FIGURES 122 – 127 )
- Body smaller; parameres of tegmen short, 0.18 times as long as tegmen; tegmen with dorsal plate as long as ventral plate.......................................................... C. paulastoni View in CoL sp. nov. ( Figs 37, 38 View FIGURES 37 – 49 ,, 62, 78, 94, 110, 126)
15. Elytra elongate, about 2.7–2.8 times as long as elytral width; antenna with scape subequal to 3rd......................................................................... C. laticeps ( Pic, 1922) View in CoL ( Figs 28, 29, 30, 31 View FIGURES 23 – 36 , 59 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 75 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 91 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 107 View FIGURES 98 – 113 , 122 View FIGURES 122 – 127 )
- Elytra rather short, about 2.5–2.6 times as long as elytral width; antenna with scape 1.2 times as long as 3rd............. 16
16. Pronotum with sides straight and converging apically............................................................................................ C. lepturoides lepturoides ( Matsushita, 1933) View in CoL ( Figs 1–5 View FIGURES 1 – 5 , 32, 33 View FIGURES 23 – 36 , 60 View FIGURES 50 – 65 , 76 View FIGURES 66 – 81 , 92 View FIGURES 82 – 97 , 108 View FIGURES 98 – 113 , 123 View FIGURES 122 – 127
- Pronotum with sides gently swollen laterally....................... C. lepturoides babai Makihara, 1982 View in CoL ( Figs 34 View FIGURES 23 – 36 , 124 View FIGURES 122 – 127 )
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.