Forcepsioneura sancta

Anjos-Santos, Danielle & Pessacq, Pablo, 2012, Description of the last instar larva of Forcepsioneura sancta (Hagen in Selys 1860) (Odonata: Protoneuridae), Zootaxa 3495, pp. 79-82: 79-80

publication ID

http://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.211296

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:53816FC6-0415-4C90-AC5B-CAD924560B98

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/704E87DF-FFFD-3848-95C5-A0EBFC6AF948

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Forcepsioneura sancta
status

 

Forcepsioneura sancta  (Hagen in Selys 1860)

( Figs. 1– 9View FIGURES 1 – 9)

Protoneura sancta Hagen  in Selys 1860: 34 (sp. nov., female description).

Psaironeura sancta, Williamson 1915: 620  ( Psaironeura  , gen. nov., comb. nov.).

Phasmoneura ciganae, Santos 1968: 221  –226 (sp. nov., male and female description).

Phasmoneura sancta, Machado 1999: 37  –38 (synonymy with P. ciganae  ).

Forcepsioneura ciganae, Lencioni 1999: 129  , 132– 136 ( Forcepsioneura  , gen. nov., comb. nov.; keys; cercus, genital ligula and wing illustrations and scannings).

Forcepsioneura sancta, Machado 2000: 132  –133 (species included in Forcepsioneura  key); Machado 2001: 845, 847–849, 853 (species included in Forcepsioneura  key; diagnostic characters; cercus and prothorax of topotype illustrations); Pessacq 2008: 518 –521, 523, 527 (species included in phylogenetic analysis); Garrison et al. 2010: 359 –360 (illustration of male pronotum, genital ligula and cercus); Neiss & Hamada 2012: 38, 42 (additional comments and included in genera larval key).

Last instar larva description ( Figs. 1-9View FIGURES 1 – 9). Head ( Fig. 1View FIGURES 1 – 9) about 2.15 times as wide as long, posterolateral margins slightly concave or straight, occipital lobes rounded, not protruding laterally and covered with several thick spines. Posterior margin concave. Antenna seven-jointed; third flagellomere the longest, slightly shorter than first and second flagellomeres together. Premental articulation reaching first coxae; prementum ( Fig. 2View FIGURES 1 – 9) short and broad, triangular, about 1.1 times as long as wide, anterior margin convex and slightly crenulated, with two long premental setae on each side and none, two, four or eight very short and thin setae posterior to the long ones; sides with a row of short spine-like setae at distal third. Palp ( Fig. 3View FIGURES 1 – 9) with the typical curved end hook, with five (85 %) or six (15 %) long setae, external margin with no setae; apical margin with two or three small teeth on its inner side, irregularly crenulated on its external side, inner margin clearly crenulated on its apical half, barely crenulated on its basal half; movable hook slender and sharp, about half the length of external margin. Mandibular formula ( Figs. 4View FIGURES 1 – 9 a,b) (sensu Watson 1956) L 1 + 2 345 y ab; R 1 + 2 345 y a. Thorax: pronotum rounded laterally. Wing pads reaching middle length of S 4. Legs light brown, irregularly covered with small hair-like setae. Femur I –III with a row of sparse, short spine-like setae on its dorsal and ventral margins, even more sparse on ventral margin, absent in two specimens. Tibia II –III with a row of sparse, short spine-like setae on ventral margin, absent in one specimen.

Abdomen: cylindrical, coloration light brown, without visible markings. Male cerci and gonapophyses as in figs. 5–6; with a dorsal row of distal spine-like setae on S 7-10 more sparse or absent on segments 1–6. Female gonapophyses ( Fig. 7View FIGURES 1 – 9) exceeding posterior margin of sternite 10, lateral valvae sharply pointed. Lateral caudal lamellae ( Fig. 8View FIGURES 1 – 9) light brown, lanceolated, more than six times as long as wide, apex rounded or acute; without nodus or transverse suture; dorsal margin with 10–35 spine-like setae, ventral margin with 15–70 short spine-like setae; central carina with 20–50 short spine-like setae. Central lamella ( Fig. 9View FIGURES 1 – 9) light brown, lanceolated, about 5.5 times as long as wide, apex rounded; without nodus or transverse suture; dorsal margin with 7–50 spine-like setae, in some specimens restricted to basal half; ventral margin with 9–50 short spine-like setae; central carina with 7–55 short spine-like setae. In between all the spinelike setae on lateral and central lamellae, there are many hair-like setae. On central lamella of some specimens, spine-like setae restricted to basal half.

Measurements (in mm, n= 5 males): head maximum width 2.79 ± 0.1, head maximum length 1.27 ± 0.08, prementum maximum length 1.59 ± 0.1, prementum maximum width 1.61 ± 0.06, femur I length 1.22 ± 0.16, femur II 1.63 ± 0,0 3, femur III 1.84 ± 0.1, tibia I length 1.47 ± 0.1, tibia II 1.63 ± 0.1, tibia III 1.94 ± 0.1, external wing pads length 3.15 ± 1.2, internal wing pads length 3.4 ± 0.16, cerci 0.1, lateral caudal lamellae 2.36 ± 0.1, central caudal lamellae 2.04 ± 0.2.

Specimens examined. BRAZIL – 1 male and last instar larva exuvia, Rio de Janeiro State, Toca da Onça, route Grajaú-Jacarepaguá, 12 ix 1976, emerged in laboratory 10 xi 1976, N.D. Santos leg. Same as previous, except emerged 7 x 1976. 4 males, 1 female, with last instar larva exuviae, Rio de Janeiro State, Mangaratiba, Reserva Ecológica Rio das Pedras ( RERP) (about 22 ° 59 ’ 23 ”S 44 ° 06’ 07”W), 5 xii 2008, adults emerged at 5, 21, 23, 25 and 27 xii 2008, A.P. Pinto & A.L. Carvalho leg.

Remarks. This species has been recorded in the states of Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo ( Lencioni 2005). The immatures inhabit streams with little current and sandy bottom, under stones ( Costa et al. 2004). Costa et al. (2004) mentions a pair of premental setae and 6 palpal setae for the genus, and in the material examined we observed 2 long premental setae and 0–8 small thin setae posterior to it and 5 or 6 palpal setae. The known larvae of protoneurid genera can be distinguished by the key to neotropical genera in Neiss & Hamada (2012).

Neiss & Hamada (2012) divided the known larvae of protoneurid genera into two groups, the first with caudal lamellae divided into a basal and apical portion and with a well-defined nodus ( Microneura Selys 1886  , Neoneura Selys 1860  and Protoneura Selys  in Sagra 1857), and the second with caudal lamellae not divided and without defined nodus ( Epipleoneura Williamson 1915  , Idioneura Selys 1860  , Peristicta Hagen  in Selys 1860 and Roppaneura Santos 1966  ). The larva of F. sancta  belongs to the second group, differing primarily from other larvae of this group by the lack of black bands on the legs. Forcepsioneura  can be distinguished from Epipleoneura  by the presence of five or six setae on labial palp; from Idioneura  by the antenna seven-jointed, caudal lamellae not distinctly narrowed on their basal third; from Peristicta  by the presence of caudal lamellae not oblong; from Roppaneura  by prementum triangular and five or six setae on labial palp. Other features of differentiation between larva of Forcepsioneura  and other protoneurid genera are in Table 1.

Forcepsioneura  7 Triangular 1 pairs 5–6 Absent Absent Lanceolated Rounded or acute

Microneura  7 Semi-oval 1 pair 3–4 Present or Present Lanceolated Acute

absent

TABLE 1. Main diagnostic characters for the known larvae of Neotropical Protoneuridae genera.

    Anterior margin of prementum Number of premental setae Number of labial palp setae Dark bands on legs Nodus on caudal lamellae    

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Odonata

Family

Protoneuridae

Genus

Forcepsioneura

Loc

Forcepsioneura sancta

Anjos-Santos, Danielle & Pessacq, Pablo 2012
2012
Loc

Forcepsioneura sancta

Neiss 2012: 38
Garrison 2010: 359
Pessacq 2008: 518
Machado 2001: 845
Machado 2000: 132
2001
Loc

Protoneura sancta

Selys 1860: 34
1860
Loc

Psaironeura sancta

Williamson 1915: 620
Loc

Phasmoneura ciganae

Santos 1968: 221
Loc

Phasmoneura sancta

Machado 1999: 37
Loc

Forcepsioneura ciganae

Lencioni 1999: 129