Ptychophallus exilipes ( Rathbun, 1898 )

Magalhães, Célio, Wehrtmann, Ingo S., Lara, Luis Rólier & Mantelatto, Fernando L., 2015, Taxonomy of the freshwater crabs of Costa Rica, with a revision of the genus Ptychophallus Smalley, 1964 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Pseudothelphusidae), Zootaxa 3905 (3), pp. 301-344 : 310-311

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.235127

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4DA803F1-30C6-4FC3-8EEF-9690A89822A6

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5491514

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/710D87BB-291F-1602-D6BD-FECCFE9BFCE7

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Ptychophallus exilipes ( Rathbun, 1898 )
status

 

Ptychophallus exilipes ( Rathbun, 1898) View in CoL , species inquirenda

( Figs. 22–30 View FIGURES 22 – 32 , 80 View FIGURE 80 )

Pseudothelphusa exilipes Rathbun, 1898: 514 View in CoL , 534, fig. 1.— Young 1900: 211.— Rathbun 1904: 242 (in list).— Rathbun 1905: 279.— Coifmann 1939: 107 (in list).

Pseudothelphusa (Ptychophallus) exilipes View in CoL — Smalley 1964b: 11, figs. 13, 14.

Ptychophallus (Ptychophallus) exilipes View in CoL — Pretzmann, 1965: 5.— Pretzmann 1971: 21.— Pretzmann 1972: 87, figs. 508–510, 522–524.

Ptychophallus exilipes View in CoL — Rodriguez 1982: 85.— Campos & Lemaitre 1999: 560 (map).— Rodríguez & Hedström 2000: 423.— Ng et al. 2008: 176 (in list).— Villalobos Hiriart & Álvarez 2008: 297 (in list).

Material examined. COSTA RICA. San José Province, Atlantic drainage: 1 female, holotype, USNM 19488, El Coronel, 700 m, undated, P. Biolley & E. Fernández leg.—San José Province, Pacific drainage: 1 male, USNM 39096, Cangrejal de Aserrí, Pacific drainage, 800 m, iv.1906, J.F. Tristan leg.; 1 male, USNM 39089, Dota Canton, San José, Santa María de Dota, 1600 m, i.1907, P. Biolley leg.; 1 male, 4 females, USNM 39089 (sic), same data; 1 male, UCR-MZ 742-02, Los Tubos Creek, 1 km W Boquete, Adan Bonilla’s farm (San Isidro del El General), V. Juárez leg.; 1 male, INPA 1857, same data; 3 males, UCR-MZ 737, Pérez Zeledón Canton, Painer, creek 14 km N San Isidro, 26.ii.1972, V. Suarez leg.; 1 male, 1 female, UCR-MZ 739, Talari River, Los Ángeles de Canaan, road to Chirripó, 11.iv.1972, V. Juárez leg.; 3 males, UCR-MZ 741, Perez Zeledón Canton, creek 4 km N (La Ese), 7.iv.1972, V. Juárez leg.; 1 right G1, 1 female, UCR-MZ 2784, grassland between Peje River and road, El Joroz, approximately 6 km S San Isidro del General, 14.v.1972, J.E. Baldrige leg.; 1 male, 1 female, INPA 1846, forest in Frank Weber’s farm, approximately 11 mi S San Isidro del General, vi.1972, J.E. Baldrige leg.—Alajuela Province, Atlantic drainage: 1 male, 1 female, CCDB 4538, Paradero 1, unnamed creek, Balsa River tributary, CTRM 480153/ 251228, 7.x.2010, L.R. Lara leg.— Puntarenas Province, Pacific drainage: 1 male, SMF 36264, La Cusinga, near Uvita, 9°08'09.3"N 83°43.2'W, 18.i.2008, G. Köhler leg.; 1 male, SMF 36265, Coto Brus Canton, Estación Biológica Las Cruces, 08°47'09"N 82°57'37"W, 1220 m, 15.ii.2007, G. Köhler leg.

Description of gonopod. Straight in mesiocaudal view, apex bent approximately 90° in laterocephalic direction. Marginal suture on mesial side, straight; marginal process subtriangular, not produced beyond caudal border of apex. Mesial process small, subtriangular, usually strongly downturned. Lateral process well developed, slightly bilobed, approximately 50–60% of stem length (from proximal opening to caudal border of apex), with shallow depression around middle, usually distinctly wider than lateral end of apex; lateral border nearly straight or slightly bilobed, with proximal lobe rounded, usually larger, wider, distal lobe thicker distally. Distocaudal ridge short, narrow, separated from distal border of lateral process by distinct depression. Apex oblong, slightly oblique, narrow; caudal border slightly convex, with small notch near lateral end. Field of apical spines well developed, facing towards cephalolateral side.

Holotype and type locality. Female, cw 24.0, cl 14.3, USNM 19488. Costa Rica, El Coronel (Atlantic drainage). According to Smalley (1964b), this locality is probably the one situated on the Sucio River, 10°07’N 83°55’W, at the border of San José and Cartago Provinces.

Distribution. Except for two records (including the type locality), all the available records point to a distribution on the Pacific drainage of central and southern Costa Rica, San José and Puntarenas Provinces ( Fig. 80 View FIGURE 80 ).

Remarks. The USNM has two jars with the same catalogue number (39089) from Santa María de Dota, one with a single male (cw 23.8, cl 14.3) and the other with one male and four females. Smalley (1964b) assigned a male from this lot to the taxon, which was identified with the types by M.-J. Rathbun. Smalley (1964b) nevertheless remarked that collections made only six miles from the type locality consisted only of specimens of P. tumimanus and P. montatus and, therefore, males from the type locality would be very valuable. We were unfortunately not able to obtain new collections from the type locality. Specimens collected at nearby locations from El Coronel examined in the present study belong to P. tristani and P. montanus . A male (cw 23.5, cl 14.3; USNM 39096) from Cangrejal de Aserrí (possibly Acosta Canton instead of Aserrí Canton), a locality about 50 km SW from the type locality, also shows a G1 similar to that of the male from Santa María de Dota ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 22 – 32 ).

The Sucio River, the presumptive type locality of P. exilipes , is on the Atlantic drainage. Almost all other specimens examined in this study, however, came from rivers that drain into the Pacific. We consider this taxon a species inquirenda rather than a nomen dubium status until further investigation helps establish its correct identity.

The shape of the lateral process of the G1 can vary to some extent. It is usually broadly subtriangular, with the proximal lobe larger and wider, which gives the lateral border a gentle asymmetric concave outline (e.g. SMF 36264, Fig. 30 View FIGURES 22 – 32 ) or even this border be more or less convex: e.g. USNM 39096 ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 22 – 32 ), SMF 36265 ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 22 – 32 ). In a few specimens this concavity can be a little more pronounced, e.g. INPA 1857, Fig. 28 View FIGURES 22 – 32 ). All of these variations can be found in the males of lot UCR-MZ 741 ( Figs. 24–26 View FIGURES 22 – 32 ).

In spite of the great similarities between the gonopods of P. exilipes and P. l av a l l en s i s we prefer to treat them as separate species based on their distribution (central-southern Costa Rica and central Panama, respectively) and because of some of the gonopod characters, as already mentioned by Rodríguez (1994). Although the presence of long setae in the G1 of P. lavallensis varies (the holotype bears a few, see Fig. 31 View FIGURES 22 – 32 ), in P. exilipes the apical peduncle is a little longer and the apex is not so strongly bent towards the cephalic side; in addition, the caudal ridge is more clearly distinct and longer than in P. lavallensis ( Figs. 22, 30, 31 View FIGURES 22 – 32 ). Whether these differences are consistent or due to variability must be further investigated when new collections become available, in particular from western and central Panama.

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

INPA

Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia

CCDB

Crustacean Collection of the Department of Biology

SMF

Forschungsinstitut und Natur-Museum Senckenberg

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Pseudothelphusidae

Genus

Ptychophallus

Loc

Ptychophallus exilipes ( Rathbun, 1898 )

Magalhães, Célio, Wehrtmann, Ingo S., Lara, Luis Rólier & Mantelatto, Fernando L. 2015
2015
Loc

Ptychophallus exilipes

Ng 2008: 176
Villalobos 2008: 297
Rodriguez 2000: 423
Campos 1999: 560
Rodriguez 1982: 85
1982
Loc

Ptychophallus (Ptychophallus) exilipes

Pretzmann 1972: 87
Pretzmann 1971: 21
Pretzmann 1965: 5
1965
Loc

Pseudothelphusa (Ptychophallus) exilipes

Smalley 1964: 11
1964
Loc

Pseudothelphusa exilipes

Coifmann 1939: 107
Rathbun 1905: 279
Rathbun 1904: 242
Young 1900: 211
Rathbun 1898: 514
1898
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF