Ikaros apteros, Chatzimanolis & Brunke, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.744.1303 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BBB5D83C-54BE-43AB-B4B8-8B896B5909BF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4673918 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2FB02118-DAD8-4812-AFFE-2ADA3356F97B |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:2FB02118-DAD8-4812-AFFE-2ADA3356F97B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ikaros apteros |
status |
gen. et sp. nov. |
Ikaros apteros View in CoL gen. et sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:2FB02118-DAD8-4812-AFFE-2ADA3356F97B
Diagnosis
Among species of Ikaros gen. nov. that lack arch-like carina on terga 3–5, I. apteros gen. et sp. nov. lacks any punctures on the pronotum, beyond the punctures along the median area, whereas I. paramo gen. et sp. nov. has punctures arranged in multiple rows.
Etymology
The specific epithet is derived from the Greek word ‘άπτερος’ (‘without wings’) and refers to the lack of hind wings. It is treated here as a noun in apposition.
Type material
Holotype (here designated) COUNTRY UNKNOWN • ♂; “Nov. Gran. [ Nova Granada], L.F.S / coll. Kraatz / Xanthopygina ref. Xanthopygus det. A. Brunke 2012 / HOLOTYPE Ikaros apteros Chatzimanolis and Brunke , des. Chatzimanolis and Brunke 2020”; SDEI.
Paratype COLOMBIA • ♀; “ Colombia, Cundinamarca, PNN Chingaza Charrascalles , 4°31′ N 73°45′ W, 2990 m, Winkler , 19–21.vi.2002, F. Guzmán Leg., M3239 / SM0548722 [barcode label] / PARATYPE Ikaros apteros Chatzimanolis and Brunke , des. Chatzimanolis and Brunke 2020”; SEMC GoogleMaps .
Description
Forebody length 7.1 mm long. Coloration reddish brown with head and mouthparts slightly darker brown. Head transverse, HW/HL ratio = 1.18. Epicranium mostly impunctate, with few large punctures posteriorly, medially and around margin of head and eye; with faint polygon-shaped microsculpture. Labial palpus with palpomere 3 widest apically, subparallel-sided. Antennomeres with crown-like macrosetae shorter than length of antennomere. Pronotum longer than wide, PW/PL ratio = 0.91; surface of pronotum impunctate except two punctures on each side of median area and few punctures around margin; with faint polygon-shaped microsculpture. Elytra shorter than pronotum, EL/PL ratio = 0.75. Elytra with large, deep contiguous punctures and dense polygon-shaped microsculpture.Abdominal terga 3–5 without arch-like carina. Male secondary sexual structures with shallow but broad emargination on sternum 7; with deep, broad V-shaped emargination on sternum 8; borders of emargination on sternum 7 and 8 appearing ‘shaved’ (with no setae). Aedeagus as in Fig. 3 View Fig ; in dorsal view paramere longer than median lobe; converging to elongate, narrow tip; apex of paramere with small emargination; in lateral view paramere concave, becoming narrower. Median lobe in dorsal view narrowing to rounded apex; in lateral view median lobe becoming narrower near flattened apex, with no subapical tooth.
Distribution
Known from the National Park Chingaza in the department of Cundinamarca, Colombia ( Fig. 6 View Fig ). The holotype was collected in the Republic of New Granada (1831–1858), which refers to a region that included primarily Colombia and Panama, and smaller areas from the countries of Brazil, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela.
SEMC |
University of Kansas - Biodiversity Institute |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |