Clossiana freija batchimeg, Churkin & Yakovlev, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37828/em.2024.71.9 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5D460FBD-DCC5-4AD7-A9D6-C86820257E2C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8B7E3774-CD6E-4F40-B9A3-67A1343AFCC1 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:8B7E3774-CD6E-4F40-B9A3-67A1343AFCC1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Clossiana freija batchimeg |
status |
subsp. nov. |
Clossiana freija batchimeg ssp. nov.
https://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:8B7E3774-CD6E-4F40-B9A3-67A1343AFCC1
Figures 1 View Figure 1 (upperside) —2 (underside): 10, 11, 12, 13.
Holotype: male, Mongolia, 30 km N Ulan-Bator, Sanzain am (valley), 21.05.2019, 1600−1700 m, T. Odbayar leg. Paratypes: 39 males, 19 females, same data, T. Odbayar leg.
Description
Holotype FW length 19 mm, male paratypes 18−20 mm, female paratypes 18−22 mm. Antennae, palpi, body coloration and hairs seem to have no taxonomically valuable characters, although lighter and brighter.
Male
Wings light-orange on upperside, bright, with sharp contrasting black pattern, typical of species.
FW: basal darkening developed, dense and narrow, spot in cell thickened, elongated with rounded edges, sometimes rounded (similar to pallida ), other spots with sharp contours, elongated. Spots of discal row fused together. Postdiscal row of spots complete, three upper spots of smaller size. Apex lightened, costal darkening between rows hardly visible, as a rule. Submarginal spots thin, V-shaped, or as thin triangles, space between them and wind edge shaped as continuous line of background color. Wing edge light, with narrow dark line at veins, fringe white, long, also darkened at veins (only rarely with thin black line going along all wing, fringe color here not changing).
HW on upperside of the same color as FW, darkened at root, lightened in median portion. Postdiscal spots vary in size and number, but usually pronounced, square or slightly rounded. Marginal pattern like that on FW.
FW underside light, pattern expressed.
HW underside: brown color remaining only basally, basic color of underside – reddish, light, sharp dark narrow strokes along median band, partially reduced. Postdiscal band spots reddish (not brown), wide reddish stripes along veins, except for light stroke in area of M3-Cu2. Marginal pattern also with reddish tint, submarginal light spots often narrowing like those of pallida , but with reddish tint.
Male genitalia (3 specimens studied): in general, gracile in comparison with those of other subspecies, uncus variable, usually distinctly shorter and thinner, dorsal process of valvae apically extended, with fan of long hairs. Valva without sharp angle between basal and distal portions but in the same time sharply narrowing into long thin prong curved inside, almost not extended at apex, only with 1-2 tiny dorsal teeth. Aedeagus of medium size, noticeably bigger than in butterflies from Khangai Mts., but not that big as in those from Transbaikalia and Yakutia.
Female
Wings noticeably wider, general color similar to that of male, only slighter lighter, spots of postdiscal row in general more developed.
Diagnosis
The new subspecies sharply differ from any known form of C. freija , first of all, in the wings color and pronounced fringe, and also in the valvae structure (without the sharp outer angle, characteristic of the pallida-calais complex, but with the valva very narrow distally, without the noticeable extension at the tip – this shape is rarely found in the nominative subspecies and is completely uncharacteristic for the species as a whole).
From the upperside, the butterflies are bright, with sharp pattern not fused into whole, and not reticulated, unlike ssp. freija and ssp. pallida . The indicated difference in the valva and uncus characters can signify that the subspecies status is not final for the new taxon. Nevertheless, the forms similar to the classical freija , are found, though rarely ( Figs 1−2 View Figure 1 View Figure 2 : 13).
Distribution and biology
Known only from the type locality situated at the remote western edges of Khentei Mts. Flies at clearings with bushes of Betula nana L. and in the larch forest ( Larix sp. ) together with Callophris rubi L. and Lycaena helle Den. & Schif.
One specimen originated from Bogdo Mt. (southern Ulan-Bator) definitely belonging to this taxon is figured in “Butterflies of Mongolia” ( Tshikolovets et al, 2009a: XLIII: 20). At the same time, typical freija (form jakutensis ) is figured in Igarashi’s book on the fig. 112, numbers 1−2, “Bayanchandman” and “ Ulan-Bator ” ( Igarashi et al. 2001) – we can not explain this weird fact, but it might be a simple misprint.
Etymology
The subspecies is named after Batchimeg Bayar, the wife of our friend and well known Mongolian biologist Odbayar Tserenpil (Ulan-Bator).
Discussion
The following subspecies can be distinguished in the study area:
1) pallida – Altai, Mongolian Altai, Western Sayans (partly), SW Tuva, Southern Khangai (populations from the Southern Altai and, apparently, the western macroslope of the Mongolian Altai are characterized by a more saturated reddish tint of the background color) ;
2) calais – Eastern Sayans, Eastern Tuva; for Western Sayans additional confirmation is required;
3) freija – from Northern Europe to the Sea of Okhotsk, Magadan and Transbaikalia, in the eastern part of the area – the form jakutensis with basally darkened wings in the females;
4) batchimeg – Central Mongolia , vicinity of Ulaanbaatar ;
5) antipodes – Eastern Kazakhstan, Saur ridge.
The examination of genitalia shows the subspecies differences with unusual variability, which requires serious study. Most likely, we should not be talking about species statuses, but about the fact that we are currently observing the hybridization of several taxa that have sharply diverged in characters, but have retained the possibility of mutual crossing.
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to V. Tuzov (Darwin State Museum, Moscow), K. Kolesnichenko (Moscow State University) and N. Rubin (Grodno) for the advices and assistance during the work. Separate gratitude to B. Khramov (S.- Petersburg) and S. Kovalev ( Dolgoprudnyi , Moscow reg.) for the help with material .
We are grateful to Anna Ustjuzhanina (Tomsk, Russia) for language improvements. The reported study was funded by state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Project FZMW-2023-0006 “Endemic, local and invasive arthropods (Arthropoda) of the mountains of South Siberia and Central Asia: a unique gene pool of a biodiversity hotspot”).
References
Bogdanov, Р.V., Samodurov, G.D., Tuzov V.K. (1997) Family Satyridae. In: Butterflies of Russia and adjacent territories, 1, 183–259, cpls. 41–78, cpls. 79 (figs. 1–6, 13–15, 24–29)
Dubatolov, V.V., Streltsov, A.N., Sergeev, M.G., Kosterin, O.E. (2005) Fam. Nymphalidae – Nymphalids. In: Key to the insects of the Russian Far East, 5(5), 286–338, figs. 175–193 (Russian).
Churkin, S.V. (2001) New taxa of Clossiana Reuss, 1920 (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) from the North Russian Far East. Helios, 2, 97–102, cpl. VIII.
Churkin, S.V. (2003) Taxonomic notes on Parnassius phoebus (Fabricius, 1793) with the description of a new subspecies from South-West Mongolia (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Atalanta, 34 (1/ 2), 47–53, cpl. I.
Churkin, S.V. (2005 a) Notes on the Erebia maurisius complex with the descriptions of two new subspecies (Lepidoptera, Satyridae). Helios, 6, 146–168.
Churkin, S.V. (2005 b) A review of Agriades glandon (de Pruner, 1798) from the Asian part of Russia and Mongolia with notes on the zoogeography of the complex (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Helios, 6, 3–38.
Churkin, S.V., Kolesnichenko, K.K. (2003) A review of Euphydryas iduna (Dalman, 1816) with descriptions of new taxa (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Helios, 4, 92–119, 5 figs., cpls. VI-VII.
Churkin, S.V., Tuzov, V.K. (2005) Taxonomic notes on some Boloria Moore and Clossiana Reuss with the descriptions of new subspecies (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Helios, 6, 93–104, cpls. XI- XII.
Fruhstorfer, H. [1917] Neue Rhopaloceren aus der Sammlung Leonhard. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 82 (2), 1–28, pl. 1.
Gorbunov, P.Yu. (2001) The butterflies of Russia (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea): classification, genitalia, keys for identification (Lepidoptera: Hesperoidea and Papilionoidea). Ekaterinburg, Thesis, 256 pp., 41 pls., 13 cpls.
Gorbunov, P.Yu., Kosterin, O.E. (2007) The Butterflies (Hesperoidaea and Papilionoidaea) of North Asia (Asian part of Russia) in Nature. Volume 2. Moscow, Rodina & Fodio, 408 pp., 852 figs.
ICZN (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, fourth edition. London (International Trust of Zoological Nomenclature), XXIX + 306 pp.
Igarashi, Y., Kimura, H., Hida, H., Umeda, Y., Yazaki, M., Yui, H. (2001) The Butterflies of Central Mongolia. Tokyo, 192 pp., figs. [In Japanese].
Lang, S.-Y. (2012) The Nymphalidae of China (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera). Part I. Libytheinae, Danainae, Calinaginae, Morphinae, Heliconiinae, Nymphalinae, Charaxinae, Apaturinae, Cyrestinae, Biblidinae, Limenitinae. Tshikolovets Publications, Pardubice-Beijing-Chongoing, 454 pp.
Lukhtanov, V.A. (1984) A review of the Palaearctic satyrids of the genus Oeneis Hübner (Lepidoptera, Satyridae). I. O. hora Gr. Gr. species group. Entomologocheskoye obozreniye, 63 (4), 776–789. [In Russian].
Lukhtanov, V.A. (1990) New taxa of satyrid and blue butterflies (Lepidoptera, Satyridae, Lycaenidae) from Middle Asia and Kazakhstan. Vestnik zoologii, 1990 (6), 13–23. [In Russian].
Lukhtanov, V.A. (1999) Neue Taxa und Synonyma zentralasiatischer Tagfalter (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea). Atalanta, 30 (1–4), 135 –150.
Korshunov, Yu.P., Gorbunov, P.Yu. (1995) Butterflies of the Asiatic part of Russia. Ekaterinburg, Urals State University, 202 pp. [In Russian].
Korshunov, Yu.P. (2002) Butterflies of northern Asia. Moscow, KMK Press, 424 pp., 106 figs. [In Russian].
Miller, L.D. (1970) Nomenclature of wing veins and cells. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera, 8 (2), 37–48.
Rubin, N.I., Yakovlev, R.V. (2013) Checklist of the butterflies (Papilionoidea) of the Saur Mountains and adjacent territories (Kazakhstan), including systematic notes about the Erebia callias group. Nota lepidopterologica, 36 (2), 137−170.
Tshikolovets, V.V., Bidzilya, A.V., Golovushkin, M.I. (2002) The butterflies of Transbaikal Siberia. Kiev-Brno, 320 pp., 48 cpls.
Tshikolovets, V.V., Yakovlev, R.V., Kosterin, O.E. (2009) The Butterflies of Altai, Sayans and Tuva (South Siberia). Kyiv-Pardubice, 374 pp., 43 pls.
Tshikolovets, V.V., Yakovlev, R.V., Balint, Z (2009 a) The Butterflies of Mongolia. Kyiv-Pardubice, 320 pp., 43 pls.
Toropov, S.A., Zhdanko, A.B. (2015) The Butterflies of Eastern Turan, Tarbagatai, Saur and South- Western Altai (Lepidopetra, Papilionoidea), vol. 2. Bishkek, 425+3 + 2 pp., cpls.
Tutt, J.W. (1896) British Butterflies, being a popular hand-book for young students and collectors. Brit. Butts, 476 pp.
Tuzov, V.K., Bozano, G.C. (2006) Guide to the butterflies of the Palaearctic Region. Nymphalidae, part II. Tribe Argynnini: Boloria, Proclossiana, Clossiana. Milano, Omnes Artes, 72 pp., 600 figs.
Yakovlev, R.V. (2004) A new subspecies of Pieris (napi) euorientis (Verity, 1908) from the Saur Mountains (East Kazakhstan). Helios, 5, 232–236.
Yakovlev, R.V. (2007) Two new taxa of the genus Melitaea Fabricius, 1807 (subgenus Mellicta Billberg, 1820) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) are described from Western Mongolia and Eastern Kazakhstan. Eversmannia, 9, 34–39. [In Russian].
Yakovlev, R.V. (2011) New taxa of Rhopalocera from Siberia and Kazakhstan (Lepidoptera, Satyridae and Nymphalidae). Atalanta, 42 (1–4), 225–230.
Yakovlev, R.V. (2012) Checklist of Butterflies (Papilionoidea) of the Mongolian Altai Mountains, including descriptions of new taxa. Nota lepidopterologica, 35 (1), 51–96.
Yakovlev, R.V., Guskova, E.V. (2012) Saur and Tarbagataj biogeographycally: part of Altai, part of Dzhungaria or transition zone between Siberia and Middle Asia? Materials of the conference “Animal world of Kazakhstan and adjacent territories”, Almaty, 186–187. [In Russian].
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.