Chaetaglaea rhonda, Stead, Ken H. & Troubridge, Jim T., 2016

Stead, Ken H. & Troubridge, Jim T., 2016, A new species of Chaetaglaea (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Noctuinae, Xylenini), from eastern North America, ZooKeys 558, pp. 147-152 : 148-151

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.558.6853

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:495FFDFE-0DBD-4B69-9BC9-2CBACF3B2954

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4E3DF077-C472-476A-A6F3-863A8580448F

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:4E3DF077-C472-476A-A6F3-863A8580448F

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Chaetaglaea rhonda
status

sp. n.

Taxon classification Animalia Lepidoptera Noctuidae

Chaetaglaea rhonda sp. n. Figs 1-3, 11, 13

Diagnosis.

Chaetaglaea rhonda is closely related to Chaetaglaea tremula (Figs 4-10). There appears to be very little individual variation within populations of Chaetaglaea rhonda . At the type locality in Ontario, all specimens have a gunmetal gray forewing with concolourous subterminal band and dark gray-brown hindwing. However, significant variation is present between populations. In coastal North Carolina, specimens of Chaetaglaea rhonda are slightly larger (forewing length 21-22 mm vs. 18-19 mm) and the forewing is brick red with a slightly darker, browner hindwing (Fig. 3) than populations in Ontario. Among the reddish North Carolina specimens examined there appears to be little variation. Chaetaglaea tremula exhibits tremendous individual variation (Figs 4-10) with the forewing varying from brick red to tan, brown, or black. The subterminal area of the forewing of Chaetaglaea tremula can be concolourous with the ground colour of the forewing or much paler. Due to this variation it is difficult to provide external characters that reliably separate the species; however, in Chaetaglaea tremula , the anal margin of the forewing normally has a pale beige line, bordered by a brick red fringe. In Chaetaglaea rhonda , the ground colour of the forewing extends to the posterior margin, which is bordered by a distinct red fringe. Internally, in Chaetaglaea tremula the costal margin of the valve is produced dorsally to form a short, subapical pointed ridge (see Fig. 12c). In Chaetaglaea rhonda this sub apical ridge is absent. The dorsal processes of the sacculus are asymmetrical in both species, but are noticeably longer in Chaetaglaea rhonda (Fig. 11a) than Chaetaglaea tremula (Fig. 12a). The female genitalia of Chaetaglaea rhonda are roughly similar to those of Chaetaglaea tremula ; however, the distal sclerotized section of the ductus bursae of Chaetaglaea rhonda (Fig. 13) is slightly longer and narrower than that of Chaetaglaea tremula (Fig. 14). DNA sequence data are congruent with the morphological data, showing that of the 658 COI base pairs examined, there is a 2.44% difference between Chaetaglaea tremula (Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi) and Chaetaglaea rhonda (Ontario and North Carolina).

Description.

Males and females similar. Holotype. Antennae filiform, ciliate; palpi red; head, vertex, prothoracic collar, thorax, and abdomen gray. Forewing length 19mm. Dorsal forewing glossy gunmetal gray (brick red in specimens from the Atlantic coast) with numerous black scales, costal and posterior margins red; darker gray antemedial and postmedial lines evenly concave from costa to vein CuA2, where both lines turn slightly toward outer margin; subterminal line slightly lighter gray than ground colour, scalloped between veins below vein M3; between veins M3 and R5 line evenly convex, terminating closest to outer margin on vein R5 and then bending inward toward costa. Black scales occur along anterior margin of subterminal line forming a distinct black spot in cell M5; these black scales gradually fade between vein M5 and costa and below vein M1. Outer margin with a series of black dots between veins; orbicular and reniform spots poorly demarcated by thin gray lines; a black dot occurs in lower margin of reniform spot; fringe gray. Dorsal hindwing dark gray brown with concolourous fringe. Male genitalia. (Fig. 11) Uncus narrow, terminating in fine hook. Juxta more-or-less rectangular with concave dorsal margin. Sacculus with ventral triangular process and elongate, finger-like dorsal process, left process much longer than right. Valve excavated above sacculus, leaving elongate, narrow arm terminating in setose, bubble-like, membranous cucullus. Heavily sclerotized costal margin with row of medial teeth terminates in short, subapical claw. Ampulla of clasper finger-like, extends dorsally above costa of valve. Vesica bends ventrally to the right with small sclerite on dorso-anterior margin of bend and large, posterior, bulbous, thorn-like cornutus. Two small sub-basal diverticulae on right extend to anterior and posterior; apical diverticulum terminates in ductus seminalis, above which a globular subapical diverticulum on right splits into elongate dorsal and posterior arms; a bulbous diverticulum occurs on left and a short, bi-lobed diverticulum arises from ventral surface. Female genitalia. (Fig. 13) Ovipositor lobes pointed with scattered setae; sclerotized plates occur on ventral and dorsal surfaces of ductus bursae between ostium bursae and a 0.5mm unsclerotized section, after which a second pair of sclerotized plates occur anterior to appendix bursae; appendix bursae with a thickened, almost leathery wall, the surface of which is very lightly sclerotized on the ventral side; ductus seminalis arises on ventral surface of appendix bursae at corpus bursae; corpus bursae egg shaped with prominent ridges and four elongate signa.

Type material.

Holotype male: Canada: Ontario, Port Franks, [Lambton County], 43.226 N 81.923 W, 17 ix 2015, J. Troubridge and K. Stead, in the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nematodes, Ottawa, Canada. Paratypes: 13 males, 11 females: same data as holotype.

Etymology.

We take pleasure in naming this species to honour Rhonda Landry, who gave support and encouragement to the authors by providing us with good food, coffee and conversation. It is a noun in apposition.

Distribution.

In Canada, this species is presently known only from dunes along the shore of Lake Huron in Lambton County, Ontario. In the United States, we have examined specimens from Carolina Beach State Park, New Hanover County, North Carolina. Additional specimens of Chaetaglaea rhonda have been submitted to BOLD for DNA analysis from the Frances A. Crane Wildlife Management Area, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, and Pine Knoll Shores, Carteret County, North Carolina. Each of these US sites are close to the Atlantic beaches and we expect that Chaetaglaea rhonda occurs in suitable habitats up and down the Atlantic seaboard.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Noctuidae

Genus

Chaetaglaea