Resupinatus yunnanensis Y. Yang & C.L. Zhao, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.591.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7785695 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7D752C75-3932-9007-FF50-FAF7FDCDF8C9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Resupinatus yunnanensis Y. Yang & C.L. Zhao |
status |
sp. nov. |
Resupinatus yunnanensis Y. Yang & C.L. Zhao , sp. nov. Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 , 3 View FIGURE 3 , 6 View FIGURE 6 , 7 View FIGURE 7
MycoBank no.: MB 847020
Holotype: — CHINA. Yunnan Province, Pu’er, Jingdong County, Taizhong Township , Xujiaba , Ailaoshan Ecological Station , E 100°53′41′′, N 24°23′36′′, elev. 1800 m, on the fallen branch of angiosperm, 24 August 2018, CLZhao 8651 ( SWFC!), GenBank No. (ITS OP901839; nLSU OP904197). GoogleMaps
Etymology: — yunnanensis (Lat.) : refers to the locality (Yunnan Province) of the type specimen.
Basidiomata: —Annual, resupinate to cupulate, soft gelatinous when fresh, fragile when drying, up to 12 cm long, 3 cm wide, 0.5 mm thick, cups globose or depressed-globose, up to 150–500 μm in diameter, aggregated in groups, 3–6 per mm, buff (4A4) to slightly brown (5B/C7), covered in a dense mat of white hairs; hymenophore cyphelloid, buff (4A4) to slightly brown (5B/C7) when fresh, greyish (19C2) to pale mouse-grey (7C2) upon drying; sterile margin indistinct and slightly brown; subiculum felty, loosely attached to the substrate and densely packed, up to 200 μm thick.
Hyphal structure: — Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections, colorless, thin-walled, branched, interwoven, 1.5–3.5 μm in diam; IKI–, CB–, tissues unchanged in KOH. presence of crystal encrusted branched hyphae with short finger-like projections at the tips.
Hymenium : — Cystidia and cystidioles absent; basidia clavate, 12–36.5 × 4–8 µm, with 4-sterigmata and with a basal clamp connection, basidioles dominant, in shape similar to basidia, but slightly smaller.
Basidiospores: —Ellipsoid, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, with oil drops, IKI–, CB–, 4.5–9(–9.5) × 3.5–7 µm, L = 6.68 µm, W = 4.72 µm, Q = 1.32–1.71 (n = 90/3), Qm = 1.42.
Additional specimens examined:— CHINA. Yunnan Province, Pu’er, Jingdong County, Taizhong Town , Ailaoshan , E 100°51′30′′, N 24°25′42′′, elev. 1800 m, on the fallen branch of angiosperm, 4 October 2017, CLZhao 3802 ( SWFC!), GenBank No. (ITS OP901840 ); GoogleMaps Chuxiong, Zixishan Forestry Park , E 101°24′06′′, N 25°03′60′′, elev. 2100 m, on the trunk of angiosperm, 1 July 2018, CLZhao 7168 ( SWFC!), GenBank No. (ITS OP901838 ). GoogleMaps
Notes: Resupinatus alboniger (Pat.) Singer, Beih. (1977: 17) , R. cinerascens (Cleland) Grgur.(1997: 47) , R. hyalinus (Singer) Thorn, Moncalvo & Redhead (2006: 1148) and R. vinosolividus (Segedin) J.A. Cooper (2012: 1) resemble R. yunnanensis by having the elliptical basidiospores. However, Resupinatus alboniger is distinguished from R. yunnanensis by the brown hymenophore and irregular finger-like cystidia (23–35 × 8–10 µm) ( Gonou-Zagou et al. 2011); R. cinerascens differs in R. yunnanensis by having the grayish black hymenophore and diverticulate branching cystidia (19–35.5 × 2.5–6 µm) ( Mcdonald 2015); R. hyalinus is separated from R. yunnanensis by having the surface hairs and finger-like cystidia ( Mcdonald 2015); R. vinosolividus differs from R. yunnanensis by having the cheilocystidia at edge of basidiomata on top surface of gills ( Mcdonald 2015).
Resupinatus yunnanensis resembles R. applicatus (Batsch) Gray (1821: 617) , R. huia (G. Cunn.) Thorn, Moncalvo & Redhead (2006: 1148) , R. incanus (Kalchbr.) Thorn, Moncalvo & Redhead (2006: 1148) and R. poriaeformis (Pers.) Thorn, Moncalvo & Redhead (2006: 1148) in having cupulate basidiomata. However, Resupinatus applicatus is different from R. yunnanensis by having the brown to black hymenophore with a lateral pseudostipe, diverticulate with finger-like cystidia and globose to subglobose basidiospores ( Mcdonald 2015); R. huia can be delimited from R. yunnanensis by its simple septa generative hyphae and oblong basidiospores ( Thorn et al. 2005); R. incanus differs from R. yunnanensis by grey to black basidiomata and oblong basidiospores ( Thorn et al. 2005); R. poriaeformis is distinguished from R. yunnanensis by dark brown or grey basidiomata, diverticulate cystidia, and globose to subglobose basidiospores and tan to ( Thorn et al. 2005).
SWFC |
Southwest Forestry College |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |