Pseudolechriops Champion, 1906b: 90

Anzaldo, Salvatore S., 2017, Review of the genera of Conoderinae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) from North America, Central America, and the Caribbean, ZooKeys 683, pp. 51-138 : 83

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.683.12080

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D7FD86CA-6374-480C-821B-A10C26CDDF32

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7DFF457D-55C5-5548-9B72-AE1A301EF931

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Pseudolechriops Champion, 1906b: 90
status

 

Pseudolechriops Champion, 1906b: 90 Figs 13 View Figures 10–18 , 26 View Figures 19–36 , 90 View Figures 87–90

Type species.

Pseudolechriops megacephalus Champion, 1906 [by original designation].

Gender.

Masculine.

Diagnosis.

Pseudolechriops is rather distinctive in appearance yet difficult to satisfactorily characterize as a genus, with variation across the species in the following characters: the insertion of the antenna on the rostrum can be in the basal (e.g. in P. megacephalus Champion, 1906) or apical half (e.g. P. klopferi Hespenheide & LaPierre, 2006), the second funicular article can be longer than (e.g. in P. megacephalus ) or subequal to the length of the first article (e.g. P. coleyae Hespenheide & LaPierre, 2006), the eyes can be vertical and relatively widely separated (e.g. in P. megacephalus ) or larger and subcontiguous (e.g. in P. klopferi ), the inner flange of the tibial apex can be flat (with no projection) to bearing an elongate, uncus-like process (Fig. 26 View Figures 19–36 ), and hind femora that can be completely carinate and ventrally toothed (e.g. P. megacephalus ), or partially carinate basally and without a tooth (e.g. P. coleyae ). Despite this variation, the modification to the mesoventrite is unique, with the rostral channel being a deep, ovoid, receptacle (Fig. 13 View Figures 10–18 ) for receiving the rostrum on the mesoventrite and anterior margin of metaventrite. Additionally, the procoxae lack a mesal process, which is found in many other lechriopines.

Notes.

Hespenheide and LaPierre (2006) distinguish two distinct species groups. The species are possibly mimics of ants in the genus Azteca Forel, 1878 ( Hespenheide and LaPierre 2006: 37).

Phylogenetic relationships.

Champion (1906: 90) and Lyal et al. (2006: 229) noted similarities with the South American genus Tachylechriops Heller, 1895 and Lechriops ; Hespenheide and LaPierre (2006: 3) disagree but do not present an alternative hypothesis. The mesoventrite of Pseudolechriops is most similar to that of Lechriops in shape although the sides of the channel in Pseudolechriops are much more ventrally prominent and the median channel deeper. The exserted head, elongate hind femora, and vertex of head with a linear carina are similar to Microzygops .

Host associations.

Adults can be found on the undersides of leaves of several species of Cecropia ( Urticaceae ), and the larvae develop in living or dead leaf petioles ( Jordal and Kirkendall 1998, LaPierre 2002, Hespenheide and LaPierre 2006).

Described species.

Ten, including nine described by Hespenheide and LaPierre (2006).

Range.

Mexico [ Hespenheide and LaPierre 2006], Guatemala, Belize, Honduras [ Hespenheide and LaPierre 2006], Nicaragua [ Hespenheide and LaPierre 2006], Costa Rica [ Hespenheide and LaPierre 2006], Panama; South America [ Hespenheide and LaPierre 2006].

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Curculionidae