Sesarmops mora, Li & Shih & Ng, 2020

Li, Jheng-Jhang, Shih, Hsi-Te & Ng, Peter K. L., 2020, Paralbunea dayriti, Zoological Studies 59 (16), pp. 1-32 : 17-29

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.6620/ZS.2020.59-16

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/816BA245-7E2D-FFBD-33DD-FBABFD98F8AF

treatment provided by

Felipe (2024-07-25 15:25:53, last updated by GgImagineBatch 2024-07-25 15:37:38)

scientific name

Sesarmops mora
status

 

Sesarmops mindanaoensis ( Rathbun, 1914) View in CoL ( Figs. 11A, B, 12–14)

Sesarma (Sesarma) mindanaoense Rathbun, 1914: 75 View in CoL .

Sesarmops mindanaoensis View in CoL – Serène and Soh 1970: 401, 406; Ng et al. 2008: 223; Liu 2013: 32, fig. 2.

Material examined: Holotype female (19.6 × 18.2) ( USNM 45765 About USNM ), small stream south side of Cotabato, Mindanao, Philippines, coll. 20 May 1908. Philippines: Kawasan, Cebu: 1 male (34.1 × 31.6), 1 female (35.6 × 32.4) ( ZRC 2014.0285 View Materials ), coll. H.-C. Liu, 3 December 2001; 5 males (30.8 × 29.9, 30.7 × 28.7, 31.6 × 29.1, 24.1 × 21.8, 23.5 × 21.6), 2 females (33.7 × 30.7, 29.0 × 26.7) ( ZRC 2019.1658 View Materials ), coll. P. K. L. Ng, 30 July 2003; 1 male (36.4 × 35.0) ( ZRC 2019.1657 View Materials ), 1 male (31.2 × 31.3) (NCHUZOOL 16333), 2 females (27.9 × 26.4, 26.0 × 24.9) ( ZRC 2019.1657 View Materials ), coll. J.- J. Li, 6 September 2018; Loboc R., Bohol: 1 male (24.1 × 23.5), 3 females (18.6 × 17.5, 18.1 × 16.9) ( ASIZ 72948 ), 1 male (22.5 × 21.7), 1 female (18.8 × 17.8) ( ZRC 2019.1110 View Materials ), 1 female (16.4 × 15.4) ( ASIZ 72948 ), Philippines: Loboc R., Bohol, coll. H.-C. Liu et al., 19 February 2003. Taiwan: 1 female (25.6 × 23.3) (NCHUZOOL 16334), 1 female (24.8 × 23.5) (NCHUZOOL 15858), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, coll. J.-J. Li, 18 May 2017.

Diagnosis of male: Carapace ( Figs. 12A, E, 14A, B) nearly square in dorsal view, 1.0 ± 0.04 times broader than long (n = 4); regions well defined, separated by shallow grooves; postfrontal region distinct, separated into 4 lobes by deep grooves; front deflexed downwards, margin distinctly concave in dorsal view. Anterolateral margin with large triangular, exorbital angle and smaller, acutely triangular, epibranchial tooth; lateral margin straight, slightly divergent posteriorly. Cornea reaching edge of external orbital tooth. Chelipeds ( Figs. 12F, G, 16C, D) robust, outer surface with numerous rounded granules, with a prominent line of tubercles along inner palm surface; dactylus curved, dorsal margin with numerous granules; proximal part of fixed-finger slightly concave, smooth. Ambulatory legs ( Fig. 12A, E) slender; P3 and P4 subequal, longer than others, about 2.4 ± 0.1 times carapace width (n = 4). P3 merus 2.8 ± 0.1 times as long as broad (n = 4); upper margin with acute subdistal spine. Propodus of P3 3.0 ± 0.1 times as long as broad (n = 4), with accessory stria on inferior proximal portion of outer surface, dorsal and ventral margins with short stiff setae. Dactylus of P3 0.6 ± 0.1 times length of propodus (n = 4), slightly curved, terminating in acute calcareous tip; dorsal and ventral margins with short stiff setae. Pleon ( Fig. 12B) relatively broad, all somites free. Telson semicircular, evenly rounded, as long as preceding somite, base of telson not inserted in somite 6. G1 ( Figs. 16H, I, 17B, C) straight, relatively stout; apical process short, chitinous part short, ending in truncate tip; setae long, simple, originating at base of apical process. G2 shorter than quarter length of G1.

Female: Carapace ( Figs. 12C, 13A, B, 15A) more convex and broader than male, 1.1 ± 0.4 times broader than long (n = 6). Chelipeds ( Figs. 13E, 14D, 15C) smaller than male. P3 merus slightly stouter than male, 2.7 ± 0.1 times as long as broad (n = 6). Pleon ( Figs. 13H, 14G, 15B) wide, rounded, telson semicircular, base partially inserted in somite 6. Vulva ( Figs. 16G, 17D) near anterior edge of sternite 5, central operculum tubular, oval shaped, directed anteriorly; posterior and anterior sternal vulvar covers low.

Colouration in life: Carapace and legs dark or light brown, without prominent spots; male chelipeds purple or reddish purple, cornea greenish yellow ( Figs. 11A, B, 12; Liu 2013). Preserved small specimens with some speckling on legs.

Distribution: Taiwan (Pingtung) and Philippines (Cebu and Bohol).

Ecology: Similar to Sesarmops impressus (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) in Taiwan and Philippines, but it has sometimes been found to climb large rocks and trees in the Philippines (J-J Li, personal observation).

Remarks: Rathbun (1914: 75–76) described Sesarma (Sesarma) mindanaoensis from a relatively small but adult female specimen (19.6 × 18.2 mm) from a stream in Cotabato in Mindanao, Philippines. No figures were provided, but the author compared it to Pseudosesarma modestum (De Man, 1902) and Sesarmoides longipes (Krauss, 1843) . On the basis of the description, Serène and Soh (1970: 401) transferred the species to their new genus, Sesarmops , without discussion. Liu (2013) mentioned there is a population of “ Sesarmops mindanaoensis ” in Kawasan, Cebu, Philippines, but did not elaborate on the matter. In the ZRC and/or ASIZ contain many specimens from the Philippines and Indonesia that were identified as Sesarmops mindanaoensis by the third author, Christoph Schubart and H-C Liu. This identification was based on comparisons with the holotype female almost 20 years ago, but none of the data have been published.

The present study of the specimens, including new material from Taiwan as well as the type of S. mindanaoensis , confirms their conspecificity. Comparisons of similarly sized female specimens from the Philippines with the type of S. mindanaoensis show that they share many key characters, including the gentle convexity of the dorsal carapace surface (when viewed frontally); the shape of the external orbital angle (acutely triangular and directed obliquely outwards) ( Figs. 13B, 14B); relatively more slender ambulatory meri and propodi where the dorsal and ventral margins of P4 and P5 are lined with dense short setae and scattered long setae ( Figs. 13F, G, 14E, F); and the outer surface of the chela is smooth or almost so ( Figs. 13E, 14D, 15C). The P2–P5 leg proportions may be slightly asymmetrical in some specimens. In the holotype female, the left P3 and P4 propodi are slightly longer ( Fig. 13F) than those on the right P3 and P4 ( Fig. 13G). There is one female specimen (21.5 × 19.7 mm, ZRC 2014.285) obtained from the Philippines which is similar in size to the holotype female and agrees with it in almost all aspects ( Fig. 14), except that its left P2 and P3 propodi are slightly shorter ( Fig. 14E) than those on the right instead ( Fig. 14F). The ambulatory leg characters, however, do vary slightly. In another similarly sized female from the Philippines (18.8 × 17.8 mm, ZRC 2019.1110), the P4 dactylus and propodus appear proportionately longer and more slender, and the setae lining the margins of the P2–P5 propodus and dactylus are distinctly sparser ( Fig. 15E, F) compared to the holotype female. Examining the series of specimens on hand, however, the differences in P3 and P4 meri and propodi, are not significant at the species-level as they are too variable. That being said, none are ever as short and stout as those of S. impressus ( Fig. 18E, F). The density of setae on the margins of the ambulatory propodus and dactylus varies in some specimens of S. mindanaoensis , sometimes appearing shorter and less dense; but it is always present ( Figs. 13F, G, 14E, F, 15E–H).

C o m p a r i n g t h e h o l o t y p e f e m a l e o f S. m i n d a n a o e n s i s w i t h s i m i l a r l y s i z e d f e m a l e S. impressus , the dorsal surface of the later species is more prominently inflated, the external orbital tooth is clearly directed anteriorly, the ambulatory meri and propodi are distinctly shorter and the outer surface of the chela is distinctly granulated ( Fig. 18A–D).

Sesarmops mora n. sp. ( Figs. 11C, D, 19–21) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:93C54D7B-2847-4A82-A9A2-D4A3CEC83A24

Sesarma frontalis – De Man 1892: 334, pl. 19(13). (not Sesarma frontale A. Milne-Edwards, 1869 View in CoL = Sesarma impressa H. Milne Edwards, 1837 View in CoL ).

Material examined: Holotype: 1 male (27.7 ×

25.5) (NCHUZOOL 16137), Gangkou R. estuary, Pingtung, Taiwan (21°59'17.3"N 120°50'01.6"E), coll. J.-J. Li, 18 May 2017. Paratypes: 2 females (28.0 × 25.8, 25.2 × 22.6) (NCHUZOOL 16335), same locality as holotype, coll. J.-J. Li, 18 May 2017; 1 female (25.8 × 23.5) (NCHUZOOL 16336), same locality as holotype, coll. J.-J. Li, 11 August 2017; 1 male (13.1 × 13.0) (NCHUZOOL 16337), same locality as holotype, coll. J.-J. Li, 25 September 2018; 1 male (26.0 × 24.2) ( ZRC 2019.1111), same locality as holotype, coll. J.- J. Li, 10 June 2019. Others: Philippines: Kawasan,

Cebu: 2 males (27.5 × 24.1, 22.4 × 20.7) ( ZRC 2019.1653), coll. H.-C. Liu, 2 December 2001; 5 males (33.3 × 30.4, 33.3 × 30.0, 27.7 × 25.6, 29.2 × 26.5, 22.2 × 20.4), 5 females (24.0 × 21.0, 19.6 × 17.1, 19.1 × 17.5, 16.0 × 14.2, 14.2 × 12.6) ( ZRC 2019.1655), coll. P. K. L. Ng and C. D. Schubart, 3 December 2001; 2 males (25.0 × 23.1, 21.7 × 19.6) ( ZRC 2019.1656), coll. N. K. Ng et al., 2 January 2002; 1 male (31.5 × 28.8), 1 female (27.2 × 24.8) ( ASIZ 72950), coll. H.-C. Liu et al., 14 February 2003; 1 male (27.7 × 25.3), 1 female (25.3 × 23.9) ( ZRC 2019.1654), coll. P. K. L. Ng et al., 30 July 2003; 1 male (27.3 × 25.1), 1 ovig. female (26.4 × 23.8) ( ZRC 2012.0434), coll. P. K. L. Ng and P. Y. C. Ng, December 2010; 1 male (28.6 × 28.1) (NCHUZOOL 14910), coll. J.-J. Li, 6 September 2018. Indonesia: Manado Murex Resort, Sulawesi: 1 female (22.3 × 20.3) ( ZRC 2019.1661), coll. P. K. L. Ng et al., 17 July 2003.

Diagnosis of male: Carapace ( Fig. 19A, E, F) nearly trapezoid in dorsal view, 1.1 ± 0.04 times broader than long (n = 4); regions well defined, separated by shallow grooves; postfrontal region distinct, separated into 4 lobes by deep grooves; front deflexed downwards, margin distinctly concave in dorsal view. Anterolateral margin with large triangular, exorbital angle and smaller, acutely triangular, epibranchial tooth; lateral margin straight, divergent posteriorly ( Fig. 21A). Chelipeds ( Figs. 19H, 20C, E) robust, outer surface with numerous rounded granules; dactylus curved, dorsal margin with numerous granules; proximal part of fixed-finger slightly concave, smooth. Ambulatory legs ( Figs. 19A, E, F, 20G) slender; P3 and P4 subequal, longer than others, about 2.3 ± 0.1 times carapace width (n = 4). P3 merus 2.6 ± 0.1 times as long as broad (n = 4); upper margin with acute subdistal spine. Propodus of P3 3.2 ± 0.1 times as long as broad (n = 4), with accessory stria on inferior proximal portion of outer surface, dorsal and ventral margins with short stiff setae. Dactylus of P3 0.8 ± 0.1 times length of propodus (n = 4), slightly curved, terminating in acute calcareous tip; dorsal and ventral margins with short stiff setae. Pleon ( Fig. 19B) relatively broad, all somites free. Telson semicircular,

evenly rounded, as long as preceding somite, base of telson partially inserted in somite 6. G1 ( Figs. 20J, K, 21B–D) straight, relatively stout; apical process very short, chitinous part short, ending in truncate tip; setae long, simple, originating at base of apical process. G2 shorter than quarter length of G1.

Females: Carapace ( Fig. 19D) more convex and broader than male, 1.1 ± 0.1 times broader than long (n = 4). Chelipeds ( Fig. 19D, F) smaller than male. P3 merus stouter than male, 2.2 ± 0.1 times as long as broad (n = 4). Pleon wide, rounded, telson semicircular, base partially inserted in somite 6. Vulva ( Figs. 20I, 21E) on anterior edge of sternite 5, operculum low, oval shaped; posterior and anterior sternal vulvar covers low.

Etymology: The name is derived from the Latin “mora ” for delay and procrastination; alluding to the long time it has taken the third author to formally describe this species. The name is used as a noun in apposition.

Colouration in life: Carapace and legs dark brown, without speckling; chelipeds reddish purple to purple ( Figs. 11C, D, 19).

Distribution: Taiwan (Pingtung), Philippines (Cebu and Bohol) and Indonesia (Manado, Sulawesi).

Ecology: The habitats of Sesarmops mora n. sp. in Taiwan and Cebu are the river banks far above the high intertidal zone in river estuaries, with muddy substrate and sometimes mixed with some rocks. This species is sympatric with S. mindanaoensis , S. impressus , S. intermedius and Bresedium brevipes in Taiwan (Gangkou R. estuary); or with S. mindanaoensis and B. brevipes in the Philippines (Kawasan, Cebu).

Remarks: Sesarmops mora n. sp. resembles Sesarmops impressus (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) in overall morphology, but differs markedly in having the dorsal surface of the carapace more prominently setose, with numerous clumps of short setae ( Fig. 16) (vs. carapace more glabrose in S. impressus ); the lateral margins of the carapace are more prominently diverging posteriorly ( Fig. 19A, E, F) (vs. more quadrate in S. impressus ); the ambulatory merus is proportionately longer (length to width ratio ca. 2.4) ( Fig. 19A, E, F) (vs. ambulatory merus relatively shorter in S. impressus , with the length to width ratio ca. 2.2); the length of the adult male telson is subequal to the width ( Fig. 19B) (vs. telson length slightly less than the width in S. impressus ); the length of male pleonal somite 6 is proportionately shorter (length to width ratio ca. 2.3) (vs. somite 6 relatively longer, with length to width ratio ca. 2.6 in S. impressus ); and the elongated chitinous distal part of the G1 is less strongly bent obliquely outwards ( Fig. 20J, K) (vs. bent more strongly in S. impressus ). Their colours in life differ markedly—the dorsal surface of the carapace of S. impressus is brown with the lateral margins cream or pale yellow; and the outer surface of the chela a uniform purple with white grains. In S. mora , the carapace is a uniform dark to purplish brown without any trace of light-coloured lateral margins ( Fig. 19A, E, F), and the outer surface of the chela is dark purple on the dorsal two-thirds and white on the ventral one-third, without white grains ( Fig. 19C, H). These differences are valid for the large series of specimens of S. impressus we have examined from Indonesia, Taiwan, Japan, Philippines and Guam.

Sesarmops mora n. sp. is superficially similar to the poorly known P. modestum (from Ternate Island, near Halmahera, Indonesia). Comparing the holotype of P. modestum with that of S. mora , the most obvious characters to distinguish the two species are the relatively narrower carapace, the male telson is distinctly inserted into somite 6 and the G1 is more elongate and slender in S. mora ( Figs. 19A, B, D– F, 20J, K, 21B–D) (vs. carapace distinctly wider, the male telson is not inserted into somite 6 and the G1 is proportionately stout and shorter in P. modestum . Pseudosesarma modestum will be redescribed and figured at length in a separate paper revising the genus with allied new species by Schubart and Ng (2020).

DNA Analyses

A 579 bp segment of 16S and 658 bp segment of COI from 12 species (53 specimens) of the Sesarmidae were amplified and aligned ( Table 1). A phylogenetic tree of the combined markers was reconstructed using BI and ML analyses ( Fig. 22). There are clearly two major clades for most of the species studied, with one clade composed of Bresedium eurypleon n. sp., B. brevipes , Sesarmops impressus 1, S. impressus 2 and S. mora n. sp.; the second clade includes the Sesarmops intermedius complex [including S. sinensis (H. Milne Edwards, 1853) ], Pseudosesarma patshuni (Soh, 1978) and Chiromantes dehaani complex [including C. neglectum (De Man, 1887) and C. magnus Komai and Ng, 2013 ]. Sesarmops mindanaoensis is very different from other species on the tree, coming out far from all the other species. Pseudosesarma can be divided into three groups, (1) P. patshuni ; (2) P. bocourti (A. Milne-Edwards, 1869) and P. edwardsii ; and (3) P. crassimanum (De Man, 1887) . The phylogenetic tree shows that Sesarmops and Pseudosesarma are clearly polyphyletic. The two new species, B. eurypleon and S. mora , described in this study are supported genetically, some species cannot be separated successfully from their closely related species, including Sesarmops intermedius and S. sinensis ; as well as Chiromantes dehaani , C. neglectum and C. magnus .

Komai T, Ng PKL. 2013. A new species of sesarmid crab of the genus Chiromantes (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) from the Ogasawara Islands, Japan. Zootaxa 3681: 539 - 551. doi: 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3681.5.3.

Liu HC. 2013. Cross Wallace's Line. Taiwan Nat Sci 120: 30 - 41. (in Chinese)

Man JG De. 1887. Uebersicht der indo-pacifischen Arten der Gattung Sesarma Say, nebst einer Kritik der von W. Hess und E. Nauck in den Jahren 1865 und 1880 beschriebenen Decapoden. Zool Jahrb Syst 2: 639 - 722, figs. 1 - 4, pl. 17.

Man JG De. 1892. Decapoden des indischen Archipels. In: Weber M (ed) Zoologische Ergebnisse einer Reise in Niederlandisch Ost- Indien. Brill. Leiden 2: 265 - 527, pls. 15 - 29.

Man JG De. 1902. Die von Herrn Professor Kukenthal im Indischen Archipel gesammelten Dekapoden und Stomatopoden. Abh Senckenberg Naturforsch Ges 25: 467 - 929, pls. 19 - 27.

Ng PKL, Guinot D, Davie PJF. 2008. Systema Brachyurorum: Part I. An annotated checklist of extant brachyuran crabs of the world. Raffles Bull Zool, Suppl 17: 1 - 286.

Rathbun MJ. 1914. New species of crabs of the families Grapsidae and Ocypodidae. Proc US Nat Mus 47: 69 - 85.

Schubart CD, Ng PKL. 2020. Revision of the heterogeneous sesarmid genera Chiromantes Gistel, 1848, and Pseudosesarma Serene & Soh, 1970 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Thoracotremata), using morphology and molecular phylogenetics, with the establishment of nine new genera and two new species. Raffles Bull Zool (in press).

Serene R, Soh CL. 1970. New Indo-Pacific genera allied to Sesarma Say 1877 (Brachyura, Decapoda, Crustacea). Treubia 27: 387 - 416.

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

ZRC

Zoological Reference Collection, National University of Singapore

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Sesarmidae

Genus

Sesarmops