Turdinirmoides Gustafsson & Bush

Bush, Sarah E., 2017, Morphological revision of the hyperdiverse Brueelia - complex (Insecta: Phthiraptera: Ischnocera: Philopteridae) with new taxa, checklists and generic key, Zootaxa 4313 (1), pp. 1-443: 112-114

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4313.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A5Fdfba5-F992-44A8-84C2-1756C943C19B

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/832187E9-FFE5-FFB2-FF74-67F0FB58FCD4

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Turdinirmoides Gustafsson & Bush
status

new genus

Turdinirmoides Gustafsson & Bush  , new genus

Degeeriella Neumann, 1906: 60  (in partim). Brueelia Kéler, 1936a: 257  (in partim).

Type species. Degeeriella grandalae Clay, 1936: 912 

Diagnosis. Turdinirmoides  n. gen. is most similar to Aratricerca  n. gen. The most conspicuous similarity between the two genera is the division of the male subgenital plate into sternal plate VII and a posterior subgenital plate, with sts on sterite VII. Within the Brueelia  -complex, this character is found only in these two genera, suggesting a close relationship. However, in Aratricerca  ( Figs 168–169View FIGURES 168 – 169) the pterothorax has parallel lateral margins, female tergopleurite IX+X is not fused with tergopleurite XI, and the vulval margin does not have a detached cross-piece, whereas in Turdinirmoides  ( Figs 175–176View FIGURES 175 – 176) the pterothorax is pentagonal, female tergopleurite IX+X is fused to tergopleurite XI, and there is a detahced cross-piece. For more details regarding similarities and differences between these two genera, see the diagnosis of Aratricerca  above.

Preantennal structure and general habitus of Turdinirmoides  are also similar to those of Turdinirmus  . As in Turdinirmus  ( Figs 182–183View FIGURES 182 – 183), but unlike in Aratricerca  ( Figs 168–169View FIGURES 168 – 169), both the mesosternum and the metasternum of Turdinirmoides  ( Figs 175–176View FIGURES 175 – 176) have one seta on each side. However, both pos and pns are present in Turdinirmus  ( Fig. 184View FIGURES 184 – 188), but absent in Turdinirmoides  ( Fig. 177View FIGURES 177 – 181). In both Turdinirmus  ( Figs 182–183View FIGURES 182 – 183) and Turdinirmoides  ( Figs 175–176View FIGURES 175 – 176) sternal plate VI has more than one sts in both sexes, but in male Turdinirmus  ( Fig. 182View FIGURES 182 – 183) there is no separation between sternal plate VII and the more distal subgenital plate, and there are no sts on segment VII; in Turdinirmoides  the male subgenital plate is divided at segment VII, and there are sts on segment VII ( Fig. 175View FIGURES 175 – 176). The female subgenital plate of Turdinirmus  ( Figs 188View FIGURES 184 – 188, 195View FIGURES 191 – 195) reaches or approaches the vulval margin, and there is no cross-piece, whereas the vulval margin in Turdinirmoides  ( Fig. 181View FIGURES 177 – 181) has a detached crosspiece. The male genitalia of Turdinirmus  ( Figs 185–187View FIGURES 184 – 188, 192–194View FIGURES 191 – 195) and Turdinirmoides  ( Figs 178–180View FIGURES 177 – 181) are structurally similar. However, while the parameral heads of both genera are broadly bifid, those of Turdinirmoides  form U-shaped folds, whereas those of Turdinirmus  do not. pst2 is a microseta situated marginally in Turdinirmus  , but a sensillus situated submedianly in Turdinirmoides  The distal ridges of the mesosomal lobes are marginal in Turdinirmus  , but more central in Turdinirmoides  , and the ventral rugose areas are more extensive on the ventral surface and along the distal margin of the mesosome in Turdinirmoides  than in Turdinirmus  .

Description. Both sexes. Head broad, flat-dome shaped ( Fig. 177View FIGURES 177 – 181). Marginal carina interrupted submedianly. Dorsal preantennal suture arising from interruptions, reaching ads and dsms, not separating dorsal anterior plate from main head plate posteriorly; laterally suture reaches margin of head, but does not interrupt marginal carina entirely. No displaced section of marginal carina present at clypeo-labral suture. Ventral anterior plate present. Ventral carinae with finger-like median protrusion; carinae clearly delimited anterior to pulvinus but not continuous with marginal carina. Head setae as in Fig. 177View FIGURES 177 – 181; avs2–3 of similar length; pos and pns absent. Coni small. Antennae monomorphic. Temporal carinae not visible; mts  3 only macrosetae. Gular plate roughly triangular.

Prothorax rectangular, lateral margins convex ( Figs 175–176View FIGURES 175 – 176); ppss on postero-lateral corner. Proepimera hammer-shaped medianly. Pterothorax pentagonal; lateral margins divergent and posterior margin convergent to median point ( Figs 175–176View FIGURES 175 – 176). Meso- and metasterna not fused, one seta on postero-lateral corner on each side of each plate. Metepisterna hammer-shaped medianly. mms moderately divided medianly. Leg chaetotaxy as in Fig. 25View FIGURES 25, except fI-p2, fI-v4, fII-v2, fIII-v2 absent.

Abdomen ( Figs 175–176View FIGURES 175 – 176) slender and elongatedly oval. Terminal end of abdomen rounded in male, shallowly divided in female. Abdominal chaetotaxy as in Table 2 and 6. Tergopleurites square-shaped; tergopleurites II – IX+X in male and tergopleurites II –VIII in females narrowly divided medianly. Female tergopleurite IX+X fused with tergopleurite XI. Sternal plates quadratic, not approaching pleurites. Pleural incrassations broad, overlapping and forming “rails” along lateral margins of abdomen. Re-entrant heads moderate to large. Male subgenital plate divided into sternal plate VII and subgenital plate on segments VIII –XI, with setae on posterior margin of sternal plate VII. Female subgenital plate roughly triangular, not approaching vulval margin ( Fig. 181View FIGURES 177 – 181). Detached crosspiece present. Vulval margin with broad sclerotized cross-piece not connected to subgenital plate.

Male genitalia as in Figs 178–180View FIGURES 177 – 181. Proximal mesosome trapezoidal. Gonopore ( Fig. 179View FIGURES 177 – 181) as convergent thickenings, open distally and proximally. Mesosomal lobes angular or rounded, with ridge across mid-length and distal part rugose; 2 pmes sensilla anterior to ridge just lateral to gonopore. Parameral heads ( Fig. 180View FIGURES 177 – 181) folded into U-shapes, without accessory sclerite. Parameral blades broad, rounded; pst1–2 both sensilla. 

Species Sex ps aps  psps tps  ss sts

To. grandalae  M III –VIII – IV –VIII V –VIII II –VIII II –VII F III –VIII – IV –VIII – II –VIII II –VI To. hrabali  M III –VIII – IV –VII VII –VIII II –VIII II –VI F III –VIII – IV –VIII – – II –VI Host distribution. Turdinirmoides  is widely distributed, and we have seen material from Muscicapidae  , Acanthizidae  , Rhipiduridae  , Prunellidae  , and Paramythiidae  .

Geographical range. Known only from South Asia. 

Etymology. Turdinirmoides  is a reference to the genus Turdinirmus  (below), which is superficially similar to this genus, especially in the preantennal area. The ending “ -oides ” from Greek “ eidos I’ for ”likeness”. Gender: feminine.

Remarks. No member of this genus was included in the phylogeny of Bush et al. (2016). Although morphological characters suggest a close relationship with Aratricerca  , the exact relationship between Turdinirmoides  and the preceding three genera lacking pos is still unclear.

Included species

* Turdinirmoides grandalae ( Clay, 1936: 912)  n. comb. [in Degeeriella  ] Turdinirmoides hrabali  (Najer & Sychra [in Najer et al.], 2012c: 65) n. comb. [in Brueelia  ] [1]

[1] The description of this species ( Najer et al. 2012c: 65) states that male abdominal sterna II –VII have setae laterally, as is the case in Turdinirmoides  and Aratricerca  , however the setae of sternum VII are not present in the illustrations of Najer et al. (2012). There are considerable differences between this species and To. grandalae  in the abdominal chaetotaxy of both sexes, and the male subgenital plate does not appear to be divided in To. hrabali  . Given the small number of species involved, and the interspecific variation in abdominal chaetotaxy seen in the closely related Resartor  ( Table 5) we place Brueelia hrabali in Turdinirmoides  based on non-setal characters and the stated presence of setae on sternal plate VII in males, but recognise that when a larger number of species in this complex are known and have been adequately described and sequenced, the systematics of Turdinirmoides  and related genera may need further revision.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Phthiraptera

Family

Philopteridae

Loc

Turdinirmoides Gustafsson & Bush

Bush, Sarah E. 2017
2017
Loc

Turdinirmoides grandalae ( Clay, 1936: 912 )

Najer 2012: 65
Clay 1936: 912
2012
Loc

Degeeriella

Keler 1936: 257
Neumann 1906: 60