Campylostoma Bell, 1858
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4651166 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/87178784-FFBE-FFDA-192E-FDE3FE3E60FE |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Campylostoma Bell, 1858 |
status |
|
?Genus Campylostoma Bell, 1858 View in CoL ( Fig. 1C, D View FIG )
MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Lower Eocene (Ypresian), London Clay, Isle of Sheppey, casts of 2 carapaces ( MNHN R03315), 1 carapace (B. van Bakel Colln).
Remarks
Campylostoma Bell, 1858 View in CoL (type species by monotypy: Campylostoma matutiforme Bell, 1858: 23 View in CoL , pl. 3, figs 8-10, from lower Eocene, Ypresian, of southern England; see also Carter 1898: 30), previously assigned to the Calappidae De Haan, 1833 View in CoL ( Bell 1858: 23; Lőrenthey 1929: 300, fig. 20c; Glaessner 1969: R494, fig. 305.1; Feldmann 1993: 208), later to the Necrocarcinidae View in CoL as a calappoid family ( Förster 1968: 181; Schweitzer & Feldmann 2000: 246, key, fig. 1; Collins 2002: 85; Fraaije 2002: 914; Schweitzer & Feldmann 2005: 34), was finally considered to be a dorippoid representative ( Schweitzer et al. 2003a: 32).
The remarkably well-preserved specimens of C. matutiforme View in CoL found in a London Clay nodule ( Collins 1961: 85, pl. 12, figs 1, 1a, 3, 3a) are much smaller (carapace length 13.3 mm) than the type series (carapace length 32.5 mm), yet show the same long epibranchial spine “produced to a length equal to three-quarters of the carapace width” ( Collins 1961: 85). Thus the mention of an epibranchial spine as “unnaturally developed” or “hypertrophied” ( Bell 1858: 23 footnote and caption of fig. 9 in pl. 3) is not justified, nor is the representation of nearly equal-sized anterolateral spines in reconstructions by Salter & Woodward (1865) and Schweitzer & Feldmann (2000: fig. 1), which have led to a misrepresentation of Campy-
lostoma carapace outline.
The epibranchial spine in C. matutiforme ( Fig. 1D View FIG ) is better developed and more inclined posteriorly than in species of Cenomanocarcinus . Like in Cenomanocarcinus , the buccal cavity of Campylostoma is “narrowed forwards in a curved line”, and the mxp3 consists of an elongate endopodite ischium and broad exopodite ( Bell 1858: 23, pl. 3, fig. 10). Additionally, the close-set and narrow orbits and pterygostomian regions are similar in Campylostoma and Cenomanocarcinus . The monotypical genus Campylostoma is removed herein from the Dorippoidea and transferred among the podotreme crabs, as a possible cenomanocarcinid.
Necrocarcinus bispinosus Segerberg, 1900 ( Segerberg 1900: 372, pl. 9, fig. 7), from the Danian of Scandinavia, considered to belong to Campylostoma ( Fraaije 2002: 913) View in CoL , possesses on each side of the carapace a nearly complete epibranchial spine which is strongly produced, located posteriorly on the lateral border and directed obliquely.
REMARKS ON SPECIES PREVIOUSLY ASSIGNED
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Campylostoma Bell, 1858
Guinot, Danièle, Vega, Francisco J. & Van Bakel, Barry W. M. 2008 |
Campylostoma
SCHWEITZER C. E. & FELDMANN R. M. 2005: 34 |
SCHWEITZER C. E. & FELDMANN R. M. & FAM J. & HESSIN W. A. & HETRICK S. W. & NYBORG T. G. & ROSS R. L. M. 2003: 32 |
COLLINS J. S. H. 2002: 85 |
FRAAIJE R. H. B. 2002: 914 |
SCHWEITZER C. E. & FELDMANN R. M. 2000: 246 |
FORSTER R. 1968: 181 |
CARTER J. 1898: 30 |
BELL T. 1858: 23 |
BELL T. 1858: 23 |