Paracloeodes lugoi Randolph & McCafferty 2000
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4263.2.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CAAA6867-992E-47B9-B6E7-0E3D8ED50F2C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6043924 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/872687CF-FFB1-2450-FF09-FDF9405065DD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Paracloeodes lugoi Randolph & McCafferty 2000 |
status |
|
Paracloeodes lugoi Randolph & McCafferty 2000 View in CoL
Diagnosis. Male imago. Unknown.
Mature nymph. 1) frons with two convergent keels, fused near clypeus ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ); 2) labrum with a pair of subapical setae near the middle that are distinguishable from others dorsal setae; 3) one row of five simple setae near distolateral margin of labrum; 4) distal margin of labrum with bifid setae; 5) distolateral margin of labrum with bifid and strong pectinate setae; 6) right mandible incisors cleft; 7) outer incisor of right mandible without vestigial denticle; 8) maxillary palp 1.40× the length of galea-lacinia; 9) apical half of paraglossa without an abrupt decrease in width (rounded condition) ( Figs. 21 and 24 View FIGURES 17 – 25. 17 ); 10) angle between inner margin of labial palp segment III and distal margin of segment II greater than 90°; 11) lobe of labial palp segment II relatively angulate ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17 – 25. 17 ); 12) base of labial palp segment III 0.40× the width of labial palp segment II ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17 – 25. 17 ); 13) labial palp with length of segment III 0.70× the width of its base ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 17 – 25. 17 ); 14) hind wing pads absent; 15) anterior surface of forefemur with one row of blunt setae near dorsal margin ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14 – 16 ); 16) medial row of setae on anterior surface of forefemur absent ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14 – 16 ); 17) anterior surface of forefemur without row of setae near the ventral margin ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14 – 16 ); 18) fore tarsal claw 0.60× the length of the tarsus, with minute denticles ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 14 – 16 ); 19) abdominal color pattern as in Figure 2 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ; 20) length of gills less than 2.0× the subsequent abdominal segment ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ).
Distribution. Guerrero, Morelos ( Mexico) ( Randolph & McCafferty 2000; McCafferty & Lenat 2004).
Material examined. One nymph on slide (holotype), MEXICO, Morelos state, Río Cuacutla at Cuautla, elev. 4600’, temp. 70F, 13.xi.1968, R. K. Allen col. [ PERC] . Two nymphs in ethanol, same data as holotype [ PERC] .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |