Eupelminus dagatiguyi Risbec, 1951
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/z2015n3a3 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3C33D1DA-7840-47EC-86CC-DCA3AE32F367 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/892FF605-FFD1-E104-218D-ECF3FD50638D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eupelminus dagatiguyi Risbec, 1951 |
status |
|
Eupelminus dagatiguyi Risbec, 1951
Eupelminus Dagatiguyi Risbec, 1951a: 213-214 . Original description, ♀, Ivory Coast, Abengourou.
Eupelmella dagatiguyi – Hedqvist 1970: 406, 435 (change of combination, keyed). — Bouček 1976b: 353 (erroneous citation of original combination).
Macroneura dagatiguyi – Bouček 1976b: 353 (change of combination).
CURRENT TAXONOMIC STATUS. — Anastatus (Anastatus) dagatiguyi (Risbec, 1951) n. comb.
TYPE MATERIAL. — MNHN.14.46. Holotype ♀ (by monotypy), dry mounted, entire but the head is detached, labeled in Risbec’s handwriting: “ Eupelminus / Dagatiguyi Ris/ ex ponte punaise/ cacaoyer/ Abengourou/ F. Dagatiguy / avec Anastatus / XXX”.
REMARKS
Risbec (1951a: 214) described the species from a single female that should be regarded as the holotype as already pointed out by Bouček (1976b). Bouček (1976b) transferred the species to Macroneura Walker, 1837 , as he erroneously considered that Risbec had described the species as Eupelmella [sic] dagatiguyi , Eupelmella Masi, 1919 being a synonym of Macroneura . The holotype is clearly a brachypterous Anastatus female.
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eupelminus dagatiguyi Risbec, 1951
Fusu, Lucian, Ebrahimi, Ebrahim, Siebold, Cedric & Villemant, Claire 2015 |
Macroneura dagatiguyi
BOUCEK Z. 1976: 353 |
Eupelmella dagatiguyi
BOUCEK Z. 1976: 353 |
HEDQVIST K. J. 1970: 406 |
Eupelminus Dagatiguyi Risbec, 1951a: 213-214
RISBEC J. 1951: 214 |