Mastostethus ruficauda (Forsberg, 1821) Bezděk, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5310645 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:86DD03A3-C21B-4D67-8081-2A76CFEF1C1D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5448835 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8D3587B7-FD7F-685E-FEB8-523CFC637B61 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Mastostethus ruficauda (Forsberg, 1821) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Mastostethus ruficauda (Forsberg, 1821) View in CoL comb. nov.
( Figs 1–6 View Figs 1–6 )
Clythra ruficauda Forsberg, 1821a: 261 , 274 (original description).
Type locality. ‘America meridionali’.
Type material examined. HOLOTYPE: spec. unsexed, ‘ Uppsala Univ.Zool. Mus. / Thunbergsaml.nr. 8230 / Typsaml. nr. 1580 / Clythra ruficauda Forsberg 1821 [r, p] // ruficauda. / 9 / Amer. merid. [box label, w, h]’ ( UUZM).
Distribution. South America ( FORSBERG 1821a).
Comments. Clythra ruficauda was usually classified as a possible synonym or variety of Anomoea laticlavia (Förster, 1771) (e.g. LACORDAIRE 1848, GEMMINGER & HAROLD 1874, JACOBY & CLAVAREAU 1906). However, the holotype is not representative of Clytrini but belongs to Megalopodidae . As it is characterized by a raised anterior part of the metasternum, it has to be transferred to the genus Mastostethus Lacordaire, 1845 .
The genus Mastostethus comprises of approximately 140 species distributed in South and Central America, but has never been revised. Based on the catalogues by JACOBY & CLAVAREAU (1905), CLAVAREAU (1913) and BLACKWELDER (1946) the morphologically most similar species are M. nigricollis Jacoby, 1904 (completely orange abdomen in M. ruficauda , while black with last ventrite pale in M. nigricollis ) and M. rufipennis (Mannerheim, 1826) (pronotum black with small orange spot in the middle near basal margin in M. ruficauda , completely black pronotum in M. rufipennis ). However, these differences may result from intraspecific variability, as the species of Mastostethus display a great variability in coloration. Nevertheless, I avoid to propose any new synonymy without study of the appropriate type material. Hence, I transfer Clythra ruficauda to Mastostethus as a valid species.
UUZM |
Uppsala University, Zoological Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Mastostethus ruficauda (Forsberg, 1821)
Bezděk, Jan 2016 |
Clythra ruficauda
FORSBERG C. P. 1821: 261 |