Anafroptilum orthostylus, Kluge, Nikita J. & Novikova, Eugenia A., 2017

Kluge, Nikita J. & Novikova, Eugenia A., 2017, Occurrence of Anafroptilum Kluge 2012 (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) in Oriental Region, Zootaxa 4282 (3), pp. 453-472 : 461-463

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4282.3.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:797FDD34-9129-4EC4-8A8F-1B7DEBA77E06

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6028651

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8E2587C2-FFAD-682C-9ED4-FBEF4676FDC7

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Anafroptilum orthostylus
status

sp. nov.

Anafroptilum orthostylus sp. n.

( Figs 1–53 View FIGURES 1 – 8 View FIGURES 9 – 18 View FIGURES 19 – 27 View FIGURES 28 – 36 View FIGURES 37 – 43 View FIGURES 44 – 51 View FIGURES 52 – 53 )

Etymology. Referring to straight shape of male imaginal gonostyli ( Figs 41 View FIGURES 37 – 43 , 50 View FIGURES 44 – 51 ).

Material examined. Holotype: L-S-I ♂ {specimen [X] (13) 2015}, THAILAND, Kanchanaburi Province, Erawan Falls , 6.II.2015, coll. N. Kluge & L. Sheyko . Paratypes: the same locality, 2–4.II.2015, coll. N. Kluge & L. Sheyko: 2 S-I ♂ , 24 I ♂, 1 L/S♂, 1 L♂, 5 S-I♀, 1 I ♀, 2 L/S♀.

Descriptions. Larva. Cuticular coloration. Head with colorless and very light brownish areas. Pronotum and mesonotum light brownish with darker brown markings; protoptera light with darker stripes corresponding to longitudinal veins ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Metanotum, thoracic pleura and sterna brown, membranes colorless ( Figs 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Legs at most part colorless, with brown band at distal part of femur ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ), sometimes also with brown marking at base of femur and at apex of tibia. Abdomen with variable brown and colorless areas; in all 5 examined individuals, tergum II with contrasting dark brown V-shaped middle spot ( Figs 2, 5–8 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ); terga III–V either nearly entirely colorless ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ), or with more or less extensive brown maculation; tergum VI darkest, sometimes much darker than others ( Figs 2, 6 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Abdominal sterna with large brown median markings, sometimes darker than terga ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Among 5 examined larval individuals, all 3 male larvae have abdominal tergum and sternum VI contrastingly much darker than others ( Figs 1–3, 5, 6 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ) and both female larvae have abdominal coloration less contrasting ( Figs 7, 8 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ); possibly, sex-specific character. Cerci and paracercus at most part colorless or light ocher, each with two contrasting narrow brown bands: one at middle and another at distal part; darkening on posterior margin of each 4th segment poorly expressed ( Figs 1, 3, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). On light portions of cerci and paracercus swimming setae also light; on brown bands each swimming seta brown proximally, colorless distally ( Figs 9–10 View FIGURES 9 – 18 ).

Hypodermal coloration. Not expressed.

Structure. Frons between antennae with flat elevation; frontal suture relatively long and obtuse-angled ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 37 – 43 ). Labrum truncate, nearly rectangular; dorsal surface with irregularly situated setae [without constant pair of submedian setae and/or pair of latero-distal setal rows –see Anafroptilum (9)] ( Figs 12 View FIGURES 9 – 18 , 35 View FIGURES 28 – 36 ). Both mandibles with incisor and kinetodontium deeply separated [see Anafroptilum (10)]; planes of incisor, kinetodontium and prostheca perpendicular to plane of mandible ( Figs 13–14 View FIGURES 9 – 18 , 38–39 View FIGURES 37 – 43 ). On left mandible incisor with 4 thick denticles and slender ventral denticle; kinetodontium with 3 thick denticles and serration on dorsal margin; prostheca bifurcate ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 37 – 43 ). On right mandible incisor with 3 thick apical denticles and slender ventral denticle; kinetodontium with 2 thick apical denticles and thin denticles on both margins; prostheca asymmetrically pointed ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 37 – 43 ). Molar processes of left mandible longer than distal molar projection; each process terminated by elongate apical lamella ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 9 – 18 : al). Maxilla with 3 canines, 3 dentisetae, 2–4 setae proximad of dentisetae and 9–11 setae of inner ventral row; all canines, dentisetae and setae slender, pointed and bent at the same direction ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 9 – 18 ; as in Fig. 77 View FIGURES 69 – 77 ) [see Anafroptilum (12)]. Maxillary palp 2-segmented ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 9 – 18 ). Labium with glossae and paraglossae narrowed near bases, widened at midlength; setae of median row of glossa relatively short, shifted to dorsal side of glossa; setae of dorso-lateral row of glossa relatively short; setae of dorso-median row of paraglossa located far from median margin ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 28 – 36 ). Labial palp with 2nd segment bearing weak muscle, 3rd segment widened apically and truncate ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 9 – 18 ; as in Fig. 78 View FIGURE 78 ) [see Anafroptilum (2)].

Hind protoptera completely absent. Legs as in A. kazlauskasi ( Kluge 2012: Figs 38–40 View FIGURES 37 – 43 ): femora nearly parallel-sided, fore femur widest at middle, middle and hind femora widest at apex; apex of each femur finely serrate (as in Fig. 59 View FIGURES 54 – 59 ); each femur without stout setae on outer margin and apex; only inner margin with few small stout setae [see Anafroptilum (14)]; fore tibia without patella-tibial suture, middle and hind tibia with patella-tibial suture [see Anafroptilum (1)]; each tibia with short ark of fine setae at outer side near base; outer side of tibia and tarsus without stout setae, inner side of tibia and tarsus with sparse spine-like setae. Claw with two equal regular rows of numerous slender denticles, reaching 1/2 of claw length ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 9 – 18 ) [see Anafroptilum (5)].

Abdominal terga and sterna with small denticles and narrow scales; scales sparse on anterior segments and dense on II–X terga and III–IX sterna ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 19 – 27 ); sterna with irregularly situated simple long setae (as in Fig. 67 View FIGURES 65 – 68 ). Posterior margin of abdominal tergum I without denticles; posterior margins of terga II–VI with small blunt denticles ( Fig. 19–21 View FIGURES 19 – 27 ); posterior margins of terga VII–X with longer and pointed denticles ( Figs 22–23 View FIGURES 19 – 27 ); tergum IX without denticles behind pair of submedian pores ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 19 – 27 ); tergum X as in A. odontostylus sp. n. ( Fig 58 View FIGURES 54 – 59 ). Posterior margin of abdominal sterna I–III without denticles; posterior margin of sterna IV–VIII with very small blunt and cleft denticles ( Fig. 24–25 View FIGURES 19 – 27 ); posterior margin of sternum IX of female larva with similar blunt and cleft denticles ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 19 – 27 ); posterior margin of sternum IX of mature male larva with very short and shallow protogonostyli, with few very small denticles ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 19 – 27 , 43 View FIGURES 37 – 43 ). Paraprocts with pointed denticles on apex; most part of median side smooth ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 9 – 18 , 40 View FIGURES 37 – 43 ). Lateral denticles absent [see Anafroptilum (3)]. Each tergalius I–II with costal rib, without anal rib; each tergalius III–VII with long costal and anal marginal ribs, without denticles, distal margin without rib; tergalius I very narrow, bent backward; tergalius II slightly wider; tergalii III–VI nearly symmetric, widest at distal part; tergalius VII longest, asymmetrically bent backward; each tergalius with contrasting dark brown middle macula formed by pigment granules on main trachea ( Figs 28–34 View FIGURES 28 – 36 ). Cerci with small denticles on all segments; one simple or composed larger spine can be present on lateral side of cercus near tip, distad of distal brown band ( Figs 10, 11 View FIGURES 9 – 18 ). Among 5 examined individuals, one has such spine on left and right cercus ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 18 ), one (holotype) has spine on right cercus and vestigial spine on left cercus ( Figs 9–10 View FIGURES 9 – 18 ), one has spine on left cercus and no spine on right cercus, one has no spines on both cerci ( Figs 1–3 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ), and one has no spine on right cercus and left cercus missing. Outer side of cercus with additional row of sparse fine colorless setae ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 18 ).

Subimago. Cuticular coloration. Head colorless. Pronotum and prosternum light brown. Mesonotum nearly colorless with brown microtrichia, certain sutures light brown ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 44 – 51 ). Thoracic pleura and sterna at most part nearly colorless with brown microtrichia, certain sclerites light brow ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 44 – 51 ). Legs nearly colorless with brown microtrichia. Abdominal terga and sterna very light brownish with brown microtrichia; terga with brownish sublateral markings. Cerci colorless with brown spines.

Texture. On fore legs of male and female all tarsomeres covered by pointed microlepides. On middle and hind legs of both sexes proximal half of 1st tarsomere (corresponding to primary 1st tarsomere) covered by microtrichiae (as tibia), distal half of 1st tarsomere and other three tarsomeres (corresponding to 2nd–5th primary tarsomeres) covered by pointed microlepides ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 44 – 51 ) [see Anafroptilum (7)].

Imago, male ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 44 – 51 ). Turbinate eyes with stem dull reddish, grayish distally; facetted surface dull reddish. Thorax brown with membranous areas white because of fat located under cuticle. Legs pale ocher, femur with white spot (formed by internal fat) at middle and near apex. In holotype, proportion of femur / tibia / tarsal segments of fore leg 70: 90: 3: 40: 27: 15: 13; middle leg 60: 52: 19: 6: 3: 12; hind leg 60: 47: 19: 6: 3: 12. Tarsus of middle and hind leg with one apical spine on 2nd tarsomere (primary 3rd tarsomere). Fore wing with membrane and veins colorless; pterostigma with 2–4 simple oblique veins. Hind wings absent. Abdominal segments I–VI colorless and translucent, with pair of dark brown stripes on lateral tracheal trunks; VII–X terga brown, sterna lighter. Cerci unicolor light ocher.

Unistyligers and gonostyli colorless ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 44 – 51 ). Unistyligers basally separated, with styligeral muscle attached between them ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 37 – 43 ). Finger-like projection between unistyligers ( Figs 41 View FIGURES 37 – 43 , 50 View FIGURES 44 – 51 ). 1st segment of gonostylus without projection; 2nd segment nearly straight; 3rd segment relatively small ( Figs 41 View FIGURES 37 – 43 , 50 View FIGURES 44 – 51 ) [see Anafroptilum (15)]. Penis light brownish; external part of penis widely rounded; apical margin of penis with unusual spines bent laterally ( Figs 41 View FIGURES 37 – 43 , 51 View FIGURES 44 – 51 ).

Imago, female ( Fig. 47–48 View FIGURES 44 – 51 ). Head dorsally ocher with variable light brown markings; eyes widely separated. Thorax dorsally light brown with ocher, ventrally light ocher. Tarsus of fore leg with one apical spine on 3rd tarsomere; middle and hind legs as in male. Abdomen ocher with variable brown markings on terga, with lateral brown stripes on sterna.

Eggs ( Figs 52–53 View FIGURES 52 – 53 ). About 0.12 mm length. Elongate-oval, with regular net-like relief.

Dimension. Fore wing length of male and female 3.5 mm.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Ephemeroptera

Family

Baetidae

Genus

Anafroptilum

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF