Panjange casaroro Huber

Huber, Bernhard A. & Nuñeza, Olga M., 2015, Evolution of genital asymmetry, exaggerated eye stalks, and extreme palpal elongation in Panjange spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae), European Journal of Taxonomy 169, pp. 1-46 : 14-18

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2015.169

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BB0E51AB-C0E6-4054-AFED-939D14BD1EFB

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6095773

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D6FF36FF-D69F-4F92-919F-82F423701E71

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:D6FF36FF-D69F-4F92-919F-82F423701E71

treatment provided by

Jeremy

scientific name

Panjange casaroro Huber
status

sp. nov.

Panjange casaroro Huber View in CoL sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D6FF36FF-D69F-4F92-919F-82F423701E71

Figs 6–7 View Figs 2 – 15 , 24–34 View Figs 24 – 25 View Figs 26 – 30 View Figs 31 – 34

Diagnosis

Easily distinguished from closest known relatives ( Pa. malagos Huber sp. nov.; Pa. camiguin Huber sp. nov.) by morphology of male palps ( Figs 24–27 View Figs 24 – 25 View Figs 26 – 30 ; symmetric modiFcations of trochanter and femur; asymmetric shapes of procursi), and by pair of semi-transparent lobes on epigynal scape ( Figs 29 View Figs 26 – 30 , 33 View Figs 31 – 34 ). From most congeners (except Pa. camiguin Huber sp. nov.) also by very long eye stalks and contiguous tips of male ocular processes ( Fig. 28 View Figs 26 – 30 ); from Pa. camiguin Huber sp. nov. also by proximally unmodiFed male chelicerae (densely covered with small scales in Pa. camiguin Huber sp. nov.; cf. Fig. 47 View Figs 45 – 49 ) and by small process between eye stalks ( Fig. 28 View Figs 26 – 30 ).

Etymology

The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.

Type material

PHILIPPINES: holotype Ƌ, in ZFMK ( Ar 13000 ), Negros Island, Negros Oriental Province, Casaroro Falls (9.281°N, 123.208°E), 550 m a.s.l., forest along river below waterfall , on leaves , 10 Mar. 2014 (B.A. Huber) GoogleMaps .

Other material examined

PHILIPPINES: 1 Ƌ, 3 ♀♀ in ZFMK ( Ar 13001 ) and 1 Ƌ, 1 ♀ in MSU-IIT, same data as holotype GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, 1 juv. in pure ethanol, in ZFMK ( Phi 187 ), same data GoogleMaps .

Description

Male (holotype)

MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 4.8, carapace width 1.0. Leg 1: 39.2 (9.2 + 0.5 + 9.4 + 18.9 + 1.2), tibia 2: 5.6, tibia 3: 3.2, tibia 4: 4.9; tibia 1 L/d: 106. Distance PME–PME 420 µm, diameter PME 105 µm, distance PME–ALE ~30 µm; AME absent.

COLOR. Carapace and clypeus pale ochre to whitish, only base of eye stalks dark; sternum whitish; legs ochre-yellow with dark brown patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen pale gray, with black marks dorsally, monochromous ventrally.

BODY. Habitus as in Figs 6–7 View Figs 2 – 15 ; ocular area raised, triads on long stalks with further distal processes whose contiguous tips seem to form a functional unit ( Fig. 28 View Figs 26 – 30 ); with small process between eye stalks; carapace without median furrow; clypeus unmodiFed; sternum wider than long (0.65/0.55), unmodiFed.

CHELICERAE. As in Fig. 28 View Figs 26 – 30 , with pair of simple, weakly sclerotized lateral processes, without modiFed hairs; without stridulatory ridges.

PALPS. As in Figs 24–27 View Figs 24 – 25 View Figs 26 – 30 ; proximal segments symmetric in shape but slightly larger on left side (e.g., length and diameter of right tibia about 90–95% of left tibia); coxa with strong ventro-distal rim but otherwise unmodiFed; trochanter with long weakly sclerotized retrolateral process directed toward dorsal; femur with weakly sclerotized Fnger-shaped process retrolatero-ventrally and more heavily sclerotized apophysis prolatero-dorsally; tibia with retrolateral trichobothrium in rather proximal position; tarsus with long whitish elongation, distally more strongly widened (club-shaped) in left palp; procursi of left and right palps strongly different, in each case with ventral process arising from proximal part (simple in right palp; biFd in left palp); distal part of procursus clearly hinged in left palp, not hinged in right palp; bulb much smaller in right palp, long processes extending in opposite directions (dorsal embolus; ventral appendix) almost symmetric (slightly longer in left palp).

LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 3%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 with> 20 pseudosegments, only distally fairly distinct.

Male (variation)

Tibia 1 in other male: 9.5 (missing in third male).

Female

In general similar to male but eye triads on low humps and much closer together (distance PME–PME 265 µm); with dark mark in place of AME. Tibia 1 in 4 females: 6.7, 7.0, 7.1, 7.4. Epigynum mostly weakly sclerotized, with apparently slightly asymmetric internal structures visible through cuticle; distinctive scape with small median process at tip and two long extensible projections curved toward dorsal ( Figs 29 View Figs 26 – 30 , 33, 34 View Figs 31 – 34 ); internal genitalia as in Fig. 30 View Figs 26 – 30 .

Natural history

The spiders were found on the undersides of large leaves about 50–100 cm above the ground.

Distribution

Known from type locality on Negros Island only ( Fig. 16 View Fig. 16 ).

ZFMK

Germany, Bonn, Zoologische Forschungsinstitut und Museum "Alexander Koenig"

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Pholcidae

Genus

Panjange

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF